It’s Really One Socialist Party With Two Names

by Al Benson Jr.

We supposedly have two different major political parties in this country–Republicans and Democrats–and their views on most anything are purported to be widely divergent. That “fact” is supposed to insure that we have “democracy” in Amerika. This fable has been perpetuated for decades by the media and our “educational” establishments. Folks, I must admit that I firmly believe this fable is a farce to fool the gullible who naively think that if there are two political parties out there then they really have a choice when they vote. This charade has been cleverly played out in every election at least since the Spanish American War and probably a few before it.

The ruling One World Government Elite in this country long ago learned that as long as they continued to give the American voting public some form to go by then they could eat out the real substance of the system and no one would ever notice, or at least not enough would notice to make any tangible difference. And it has worked, in part because we have a governmental “education” system that does not and will not teach those committed to its care the ability to think critically. The current government school system teaches kids what to think rather than how to think and, I mean, after all, why would anyone even want to think anything that contradicts what Big Brother has told us is the “truth?” After all, how dare we!

In the last election the voting public expressed their utter dissatisfaction with Obama’s blatant socialist agenda by how they thought they voted. They didn’t realize that, in their repudiation of Obama’s socialism all they were really doing was voting for Republicans that would give them the same agenda while pretending it was different. It was quite evident from the Republican “leadership” in Congress after the election that very little was going to change except a few of the players’ names. It would all continue to be business as usual (corporate fascism) in Sodom on the Potomac. After all, when you finally grasp the truth that one “shadow party” really controls the reins of both major political parties, why should you expect anything different from Mitch McConnell than you got from Dirty Harry Reid? If you do you’re dreaming. It will not happen. Oh, there may well be a few cosmetic changes to fool those who don’t know how the game is played, and those will be sufficient because most voters have yet to figure out how the game is played–and, sad to say, Christian voters remain among the most gullible of all. They who should display the most discernment often seem to have the least–and are proud of that fact.

A good case in point to display how the two parties are really only one party was the vote for the confirmation of Loretta Lynch as the new Attorney General to replace “Fast and Furious” Holder. At the very best, all she will ever be is Eric Holder Lite, and she might even be worse. Like all of Obama’s choices for any post, she is fervently anti-Second Amendment and will look for ways to disarm Americans any way she thinks she can, any time she thinks she can find a way to get by with it. I trust her about as much as I trusted that sidewinder we saw slithering down that sand dune in West Texas several years ago. And I trust our present “conservative” Congress with about the same degree of confidence. I’m not saying they’d sell us out tomorrow–they might wait until the day after.

The Senate voted to confirm Comrade Lynch to replace Comrade Holder with the help (or collusion) of ten Senate Republicans. Without their crucial vote she probably would not have been able to cut the mustard and Obama would have had to hunt up yet another leftist to nominate. But “conservative” Senator McConnell and his “gang of 9” saved him the trouble. And I suspect that it was known well beforehand that they would.

An article that appeared on http://www.breitbart.com for April 23rd, written by Matthew Boyle, noted: “Senate Democrats still control the U.S, Senate, election results last November aside, an analysis of all the votes taken since Sen. Mitch McConnell took over as Majority Leader shows. In fact, with two minor exceptions, every single vote that has pass the U.S. Senate since the beginning of this Congress in January has passed with at least–usually more than–93 percent of support from Democrats.” Dirty Harry’s spokesman, Adam Jentleson, has stated that McConnell had done the right thing by pushing legislation that the Democrats can support. So if that’s the case, what really changed with the election last year? We are still being fed the same socialist legislative agenda that Comrade Obama is pushing, only now the Republicans are doing it instead of the Democrats!

That indicates to a lot of people, myself among them, that there is basically no real difference between the two political parties. They both promote the same socialist program. The only difference now is that the Republicans claim they are not doing this when the clearly are. So we have one party with two names but always one agenda a One World Government agenda–a Council on Foreign Relations/Trilateral Commission agenda.

There was a photo in the Breitbart article of both Dirty Harry and McConnell–with Dirty Harry looking jubilant and McConnell looking complacent–like the cat that had just swallowed the canary. And why not? He’s pulling down a fat congressional salary for selling out his constituents so he’s happy.

Folks, this will not change until the ignorant American voter, in sufficient numbers, begins to realize he’s being had and starts trying to do some homework to change that. There are all manner of places on the Internet where the disgruntled voter can look to see what’s going on. It’s not as if all this was totally “hidden beneath a bushel.” It just takes a little effort to begin to discern just how the public is being shafted by our One Party System posing as two parties. I have, in previous articles, mentioned all kinds of places where you can locate information as to what is going on. I’d only repeat myself by listing them all again–and is anyone really interested?

So you’ll get Hillary for president next year and we will do this same game all over again, and even if you get, by some rare fluke, one of the Republican contenders, as Hillary said about Benghazi, “What difference does it make now?”

Republicans (tweedle-dum) and Democrats (tweedle-dee)

by Al Benson Jr.
Back in 1968 when George Wallace ran for president on the American Independent Party ticket he made a statement that was so true it ought to be remembered. In commenting on the two major parties, Wallace said they were “Tweedle-dum and Tweedle-dee and there’s not a dime’s worth of difference between the two.” I have often wondered if Mr. Wallace knew just how right he really was.

There is no real, substantial difference between the two. Whatever differences there seem to be are shallow to say the least. Oh to be sure the rhetoric is different but it seems that no matter which party runs the federal government the agenda always seems to be the same and the results are the same—less liberty and less economic prosperity and the group presently at the helm shouts at us about how much better off we are with them than with the loyal opposition. It all sounds so canned anymore that I think both parties hire the same script writers, and they might as well, because both parties pursue the same agenda—forcing this country eventually to become part of a One World socialist government.

I watch some of this foolishness going on in both the regular “news” media and on the Internet. The polls abound—will Hillary beat Romney; will Rand Paul beat Hillary; will Huckabee do better than both of them? It’s all a charade, folks. It keeps you from doing any really serious thinking about what is happening to us and keeps you focused on the ephemeral stuff, the stuff that really makes no difference in the long run and so you never get to ask any serious questions about what really goes on—questions like “who really controls both political parties” and what is the agenda of those who control both political parties?

For instance, if I mentioned the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group, who among the public has ever even heard of these organizations? When was the last time your newspaper or the six o’clock news broadcast on the tube mentioned these groups and the influence they wield on both political parties? Can’t remember when? Neither can I. The fact is that these groups are our real “shadow government” in this country. These are the people that get to decide who runs for office and how the agenda is presented and what this country does in regard to our foreign affairs—the whole nine yards!

On July 18th of this year Pastor Chuck Baldwin had an article on http://libertycrier.com entitled The CFR Has Controlled Both Major Parties In Washington For Decades. You might think that some up and coming young journalist would love to sink his teeth into doing an article like that, but don’t hold your breath. It will never happen. The media people know all of this and they will never tell. And since so many of them are part and parcel of this, they figure you are better off not knowing about it. “He who knows nothing questions nothing (at least nothing worthwhile).”

Admiral Chester Ward, a former CFR member until he realized what the game was and got out, has written: “The most powerful clique in these elitist groups (such as CFR, Trilateral Commission, et al) have one objective in common—they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United States…The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence and submergence into an all-powerful one world government.”

Pastor Baldwin’s article gave a fair-sized list of some of the prominent CFR and Trilateral Commission members—people you’ve all heard of before but you’ve never been told what they are really all about. Some of the names on the list, and you can check them out for yourself, are: George Herbert Walker Bush, Bill Clinton, Sandra Day O’Connor, Dick Cheney, Colin Powell, Jesse Jackson, Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw, David Brinkley, Diane Sawyer, Barbara Walters, Cyrus Vance, Henry Kissinger, Alan Greenspan, Dianne Feinstein, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Chuck Hagel, John McCain, Jay Rockefeller, Fred Thompson, Richard Nixon, Hubert H. Humphrey, George McGovern, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Al Gore, John Kerry. This isn’t the whole list but it gives you and idea of the influence the CFR/Trilateral Commission cabal exerts on both political parties.

Pastor Baldwin has correctly noted that: “The globalists within the two major parties will do anything to make sure that a non-globalist is not elected President of the United States or given a too-powerful position of congressional leadership. Hence the GOP leadership is pouncing on Rand Paul early to try to kill any momentum he might garner going into the 2016 presidential race. Virtually everything the global elite plan to do hinges on America engaging in perpetual war. Perpetual war is the linchpin that holds the entire globalist agenda intact. Anyone who threatens that linchpin is declared an enemy by the establishment and is slated for political destruction.” This should be obvious. Look at what they did to Ron Paul in 2012 and if his son manages to have even half the perseverance in the direction of peace and truth that his dad did they will do the same to him in 2016, or thereafter if they have to. If he doesn’t realize that by now, it will dawn on him shortly. Any truly honest man need not apply for the position of President because if he does his own CFR-controlled party will make sure whoever runs in the “other party” gets the nod.

Back in 2006, Mordechai Zember did an article for http://www.newswithviews.com the title of which was Council on Foreign Relations Is An Elite Cabal. Should you wonder why you have never heard of these folks, Mr. Zember explains: “Of course, the people know almost nothing about the Council on Foreign Relations because many propagandists, I mean journalists, themselves are members of this elite organization.” And then he went on to list some of the same people that Pastor Baldwin mentioned. And he also said: “In fact the CFR owns and controls the television stations, radio stations, and newspapers such as ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, PBS, New York Times, Washington Post, Time, U.S.News & World Report, and Newsweek. Sadly, some of the Internet newssites ‘remain conspicuously silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their activities’.” He did mention the John Birch Society being one group that has spent considerable effort trying to expose the CFR for what it really is, but many other “conservative” groups just seem to ignore it and what it does. Makes you wonder just how “conservative” some of them really are.

The global elite also has a vested interest in making sure we elect ignorant people to Congress, people that have no real grasp of what they should be doing or what to look out for. I recently talked to a man here in Louisiana that chanced to have lunch with a Congressman from here in Louisiana. He asked the Congressman what he knew about the United Nations Agenda 21 program and its implications for this country. The Congressman had never even heard of Agenda 21 and knew nothing about it. Suffice it to say he should have. Needless to say I will look elsewhere when I cast my vote in November. Seeing that congressmen take an oath to preserve and protect the Constitution then they should be aware of those that are out to subvert the Constitution so they can resist all such efforts. If they are not even aware of our adversaries how can they protect us from anything? But, then, when it comes right down to it I suppose for most, just getting re-elected and staying on the gravy train is what’s really important. What these politicians fail to realize is that if the CFR and the other one world government groups have their way Congress will probably no longer be needed and there may no longer be a gravy train for them unless they are willing to sell their souls to the Devil—but then, maybe a lot of them have already done that.

If you ever get to go to a town meeting it might not hurt to ask your congressman what he knows about the CFR. How he answers that question may well determine if he is worth voting for again or if you should work for some other candidate.

I posted an article on 9/15 on http://thecopperhead.blogspot.com called “C’mon Joe, Wake Up and Smell the Coffee” that could easily have been a companion piece to this article as they both deal with the same situation, and in that article there are several books mentioned that you can read online if you are willing to educate yourself as to what is really going on and has been going on for decades now.

Republicans Play the Weak Sister Scenario

by Al Benson Jr.

I don’t know if things will end up turning out this way or not, I am not a prophet nor the son of a prophet, but, at this point, it wouldn’t surprise me. Watching the last two presidential elections in this country, I have come to the conclusion that the whole presidential election charade is just that, a charade to fool the general public into thinking that they have actually elected a president when all they have really done is to choose one of the two candidates picked for them by the major political parties–both of which are under the control of a clique of One World Government elitists, many of whom belong to the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, or the Bilderberg Group, or to all three.

In 2008 the Republican Establishment picked John McCain to run against King Barack the First. McCain was probably the worst candidate they could have picked. Posing as a “conservative Republican”  he was actually a raving liberal and still is, especially when he loses his temper. His Vice-Presidential running mate would probably have done better than he did had she gotten the nomination, but that wasn’t supposed to happen and the Republican Establishment (identical to the Democratic Establishment in all but rhetoric) was supposed to make sure Obama had no real opposition or competition. He didn’t, and probably could not have stood up to it if he had, so the Republicans gave him McCain to run against, and after the Bush years that was a fait accompli.

Then along came the 2012 election and it was the same game all over again. Obama was supposed to get back in again and so, in Romney, the Republicans picked the weakest possible sister they could in a candidate. Not that any of the rest of them were all that great–except for Ron Paul–the one honest candidate in the entire presidential election. The fact that he was  honest, and popular, more popular than the “news” media ever let on, was a problem. So the Republican Establishment had to deep six him at all costs. The very last thing they wanted was an honest man in the White House, and besides, Ron might have given King Barack the First a real run for his money, even with the creative voting techniques employed in that election–and that couldn’t happen. Ron Paul had to go, and the Establishment made sure he went. One of the states they redistributed his votes to Romney in was Louisiana, where I live. The caucuses in Louisiana gave Ron Paul 80% of the vote. I was at one of them. And I knew people that went to the state convention in Shreveport, where Ron Paul had 80% of the delegates and the Republican Establishment ended up seating the 20% that Romney had and throwing out Ron Paul’s 80%. That’s Republican politics, not only in the South, but everywhere. The same game is being played right now in Mississippi, where Tea Party candidate Chris McDaniels ran against the Establishment candidate and it went into a run-off. McDaniels probably won legitimately, but they will make sure he doesn’t get it because his opponent is willing to play ball with the Establishment in both parties. And that’s what they really want–a brown-noser! At any rate, Romney was supposed to win at all costs, because the Establishment in both major parties already knew that Obama had been okayed for a second term and they knew Romney could be depended on to be the “loyal (losing) opposition.”

After the election Romney seemed almost relieved that he hadn’t won, but then he wasn’t supposed to and I think he knew that. He was just glad the charade was over so he could move on to other things. I think he was tired of playing the (intentional) loser.

Now, as 2016 approaches, and it appears that King Barack probably won’t be granted a third term as Dictator of the Proletariat by his handlers, which he’d dearly love (unless the Establishment changes its mind for some reason) the Republicans are again casting about for another weak sister to run against Hillary Clinton, or as some folks call her “St. Hillary” or “Hitlery.”

Months ago it was rumored that the Bilderberg Group  had already picked Hillary to be the next president. Again, if it were known, the Establishment and not the public really get to choose who runs. If it turns out that Hillary “runs” then she would be the logical choice of the Establishment to complete the work of entirely socializing the country that King Barack  was not able to complete (after all, those golfing holidays do slow down the process). At this point it may well be that the Establishment wants Hillary in there, but they can’t just appoint her in the same manner that Obama writes out executive orders, because that would give the game away, and so we are forced to participate in another sham election, the outcome of which has probably already been determined. 

So, when I began seeing subtle rumors on the Internet that Romney just might be “considering” another presidential run, I was not all that surprised. Although, if I was Romney, I’d probably be getting tired of being picked to lose to whatever Democratic candidate the Establishment has predetermined will be the next president. But, if nothing else, Romney is a team player, so if they tell him to run he will run, whether he wants to or not.

It has been reported that, in 2008, Hillary was told by the Establishment to stand down and Let King Barack “win” the election, and she ended up being appointed Secretary of State for her compliance. But playing second fiddle is not enough for Hillary. She wants all the marbles, and this time they may be ready to give them to her and to spring her on the country as the first woman president.  One has to wonder then, if we will all be told that we are “anti-feminist” if we don’t vote for Hillary. After all, if the race card worked for Obama, why not the Women’s Lib card for Hillary? And there is stuff out there on the Internet asking folks to work to draft Hillary for president, though if she has already been chosen by the Establishment, all that is just window dressing to make it look  like a “spontaneous” movement of the people.

And, if for some reason the game plan changes and it doesn’t work out that way and they decide to let the Republican nominee win this go-round, remember that you will still be getting the Establishment’s candidate, the “lesser of the two evils” as it were. Please don’t be gulled into believing that old saw about the Democrats being the liberals and the Republicans being the conservatives. That’s hogwash. They are both socialist–and both controlled by the same people–the CFR/Trilateral/Bilderberg triad.

If you are willing to read, which fewer and fewer seem to be anymore, check out None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen. It’s on the Internet, and I think his book The Rockefeller File is also. And if you want a little of the history of the “conservative” Republican Party, then check out Thomas DiLorenzo’s books The Real Lincoln and Lincoln Unmasked, and Donnie Kennedy’s and my book Lincoln’s Marxists.    

Is The Fix In For The Republican Senate Run-off In Mississippi?

by Al Benson Jr.

That question might seem like an unseemly one to ask, but given the nature of today’s political system, I don’t feel it’s out of line at all. In fact, I think we’d be remiss if we didn’t ask it.

I just read an article on http://www.thegatewaypundit.com that had this headline: McDaniel Supporters Barred From Reviewing Voter Rolls in Nine Mississippi Counties  and this article was posted on June 27th by Jim Hoft.

Mississippi law says that the county clerk is required to allow public viewing “of the documentation from the election, including who voted.”  It would seem that the one unwritten exception to that is “except when workers for Chris McDaniel turn up and want to check the records to make sure it’s all on the up and up.” That unwritten exception seems to be in full force right now in Mississippi, as, according to the above listed website McDaniel supporters are being kept from reviewing voter records in nine Mississippi counties.

The article observed: “Lindsay Krout, a volunteer working in Mississippi, was barred from reviewing voter rolls in Lafayette County Mississippi Friday morning. Lindsay said when she went to the Lafayette County courthouse this morning (June 27th) and was forced to wait for an hour. Then the County Clerk told her the Secretary of State’s  office said the county had to redact the social security numbers and addresses from the voter rolls. The clerk said it will take until Wednesday to redact the information. And the county will charge McDaniel supporters for the extra work. Lindsay said McDaniel supporters in Lowndes County and Lauderdale County faced similar pushback from local officials.” The same game seems to be going on in Stone County, Marshall County, Quitman County, Forrest and Smith Countys.  And the Governor would like to certify the election on Monday. That way all those “loose ends” about who really won will be all neatly tied up and shoved down the memory hole and none of it will make any difference.

Whatever they plan on doing in Washington when Congress reconvenes they must need Thad Cochran’s vote for and they know they won’t have it if McDaniel is declared the winner because of vote fraud, which from what I have read, there seems to be quite a bit of in this election.

If they find evidence of vote fraud after the election has been certified, will it make any difference then, or will that just be swept under the electoral rug with the rest of the garbage? Mr. McDaniel says he has evidence of around 1000 votes in Hinds County where the voter voted twice. How many more are there in these nine counties where his workers are getting the bum’s rush because the County Clerks won’t let his workers check the voting records–at least until after the election is “certified.” Something smells rotten here, folks, and it ain’t all in the State of Denmark. Most of it is in the State of Mississippi–and you can’t even blame the Democrats for it. You have to blame the “conservative” (what a laugh) Republicans.

Don’t forget to check out some of those websites on the Internet that deal with Republican and Democratic involvement with the Council on Foreign Relations. I realize it will take time away from the ballgame, but you DO need to be aware of this.

The CFR and Marxist Worldviews—is there any difference?

By Al Benson Jr.

Some have inquired as to whether the worldviews of the One World groups like the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group are identical to those of various Marxist and socialist groups.

While I realize there may be some subtle differences, I feel that the worldviews of all these groups are pretty much in the same ballpark, although expressed differently. It’s somewhat like the rhetorical differences between the Republican and Democratic Parties. They both want to drive us off the same cliff but one is willing to do it a little slower than the other. However the ultimate drop after you go over the cliff is the same, whether you got there faster or slower.

Most know that Karl Marx was the author of The Communist Manifesto  which outlined Marx’s view of how to take a country over. Interestingly enough, he had ten points listed in the Manifesto on how to do this. His reinterpretation of the Ten Commandments?

Marx was a boring writer and his work could be described, as one man said years ago, as “reams and reams of toilet paper.” What most folks don’t realize, though, is that although Marx was the author, the ideas he presented in the Manifesto were not totally his. In fact, Marx was a hack writer who was hired by an organization called “The League of the Just” to write the Manifesto. The first edition of that work did not even list him as the author. In later editions he was allowed to put his name on it and take credit for it—but not for the premier edition, which I have seen pictures of, and his name does not appear on it. The League of the Just had something to do with the Illuminati, was part of it in some way. That’s something else for you to check out on the Internet.

Marx’s Manifesto advocated things like the abolition of private property, heavy progressive income taxes, public schools—in other words the dictator’s hand in every area of your life, and he made sure to let people know he was opposed to organized religion. It was “the opiate of the masses” according to Marx.

Marx’s “dictatorship of the proletariat” was, in reality the rule of “the people” (Communist parties) over all areas of our lives and this was to take place all over the world.

So, how different is this than what the One World Government groups have in mind for us? There may be minor technical differences, but the overall worldview is the same in either case—a special elite group running everyone’s life, telling you what you can or  cannot do, where you can or cannot go, what you can or cannot think or believe. They want to do away with the Christian confession that “Jesus is Lord” (the Gospel) and replace that with the all-powerful state as “god.”

One of our main problems in this country is that the CFR, the Trilaterals and Bilderbergers have taken over the US government and both political parties. They infest the media, Hollyweird, the military and education—and most of you have never even heard of them. Why do you suppose that is? You’d think that a group or groups with this much influence would be well known, and yet the average American has never heard of them. They are, in effect, our “shadow government.”—our un-elected rulers.

According to http://www.conspiracyarchieve.com  “If one group is effectively in control of national governments and multinational corporations; promotes world government through control of media, foundation grants, and education; and controls and guides the issues of the day; then they control most options available. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the financial powers behind it, have done all these things, and promote the ‘New World Order’ as they have done for over seventy years…The CFR is the promotional arm of the Ruling Elite in the United States of America. Most influential politicians, academics and media personalities are members, and it uses its influence to infiltrate the New World Order into American life.’”

To understand how people in all these critical fields can be part of a group that seeks to do away with American sovereignty in America you have to go back and do the history homework. You at least have to go back as far as the early 1900s to begin to see what those people have done to us, but for the real foundation of all that you need to back to the War of Northern Aggression in the 1860s at least, and some folks would say you need to go back even further—all the way back to 1787. The folks that say that raise some interesting points not easily dismissed.

Some of our problems are readily observable. For instance, the Conspiracy Archive articles observes: “Woodrow Wilson was elected President in 1913, beating incumbent William Howard Taft, who had voted to veto legislation establishing a central bank. To divide the Republican vote and elect the relatively unknown Wilson, J. P. Morgan and Co. poured money into the candidacy of Teddy Roosevelt and his Progressive Party…According to eyewitnesses, Wilson was brought to Democratic Party headquarters in 1912 by Bernard Baruch, a wealthy banker. He received an ‘indoctrination course’ from those he met, and in return agreed, if elected, to support the projected Federal Reserve and the income tax, and ‘listen’ to advice in case of war in Europe and on the composition of his cabinet.” Can you begin to see now how these One World Government types influence what our “elected representatives” do? In fact our “elected representatives do not represent us—they represent the interests of the Ruling Elites. That being the case, maybe the Ruling Elites should pay their salaries instead of the public having to. But that would give the game away and, by now, most of us should realize that we have to have the pretense of representative government (the form but not the substance) so the American people, educated in Karl Marx’s “public schools” will willingly go along with those who plan to cut their throats both financially and literally if and when the latter becomes necessary.

As noted on http://www.unc.edu/  “The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England, and which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established.” That’s according to Carroll Quigley, the author of Tragedy & Hope. . Mr. Quigley, a devoted One-Worlder, was the mentor for Bill Clinton. Anyone remember him? And on the same website, Dan Smoot, former member of the FBI stated “The ultimate aim of the CFR is to create a one-world socialist system, and to make the US an official part of it.” That’s a pretty straight forward statement that shows that what the CFR people want is no different than what the socialists and Marxists want. Their worldviews are almost identical.

Again, the same article states: “In 1973, David Rockefeller, having read a book by Zbigniew Brzezinski which praised Marxism, formed the Trilateral Commission, and appointed Brzezinski to be the first Director of the Trilateral Commission. Future president Jimmy Carter became a founding member of the Trilateral Commission. Jack Newell, in his book Why a Bankrupt America?  States ‘The original literature of the Trilateral Commission also states exactly as Brzezinski’s book had proposed, that the more advanced Communist States should become partners in the alliance leading to world government….In 1976 when Carter was elected president, he filled his administration with 284 members of the CFR…All the recent presidents since then have also surrounded themselves with CFR and TC members.’”

The site http://activism101.ning.com  carried an article by author Dean Henderson in June, 2012 which said, in part: “CFR members have dominated every Administration since FDR and most presidential candidates come from its ranks. Adlai Stevenson, Dwight Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, John F, Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Hubert Humphrey, George McGovern, Walter Mondale, Jimmy Carter, George Bush Sr. and Al Gore are all CFR alumni…Nearly every CIA Director since Allen Dulles has been a CFR member. These include Richard Helms, William Colby, George Bush Sr., Bill Casey. William Webster, James Woolsey, John Deutsch and Robert Gates…The Nixon administration had 115 CFR members, while the Clinton Administration had over 100 CFR alumni.”
Bill Clinton, with his impeachment pending, ran to New York to try and shore up support for himself from his handlers in the CFR. Publisher John F. McManus astutely observed that: Bill Clinton knows well that he serves as President because the members of the ‘secret society’ to which he belongs chose him and expect him to carry out its plans.”

So much for the President serving the interests of the American people. That’s the furthest thing from their minds Just about all the presidents we have had since Wilson have been little more than talking heads allowed to assume the office of president only so they could further the agenda of the One World Government people. Should they fail to do that, should they slip the traces, so to speak and actually decide to do something not on the One World agenda, well, look what happened to Kennedy and Nixon—one assassinated, the other “watergated.”

Our current situation is no different. Obama was handed the office of president (literally) because his Marxist mentality fits in perfectly with the designs of the Ruling Elite and as long as he does what they want he is home free. George Soros and the CFR people give him his marching orders and all his silly rhetoric about “hope and change” is to fool the naïve into thinking he really has an independent thought In his head. It’s all bovine fertilizer and the brain-dead who have not figured it out by now just ain’t trying.

One thing the Marxists, socialists, and One World Ruling Elites haven’t figured out yet is that God is more powerful than they are and He will only let them go so far. After that they will answer to Him. Oh, they’d like to think they are all-powerful, but the Lord, in His own time, will disabuse them of that folly and judge them for their idolatry. Whether I live to see that or not doesn’t matter. I know it will happen because God is just.

Our Invisible Government—Part Three

By Al Benson Jr.

Dan Smoot’s excellent book The Invisible Government has given much information about the Council on Foreign Relations and I would encourage everyone to check it out on either Amazon.com or http://www.gutenberg.org and start to become educated as to what this almost unheard of organization does to influence the direction this country has gone in.

Another book that contains much information about the Council on Foreign Relations is The Biographical Dictionary of the Left–Volume One which was printed back in 1969. The author was Francis X. Gannon This book contains much information about many leftist individuals and groups, but the CFR is covered on pages 53-62. I don’t know if this book has ever been updated or reprinted or not, but if not it should be.

Mr. Gannon has made several comments that will give the discerning some food for thought. He noted, on page 58, that: “Franklin Roosevelt’s precipitate plunge into globalism was completely agreeable to CFR leaders. They were solidly behind U.S. involvement in World War 2 long before Pearl Harbor. They favored Roosevelt’s fawning overtures to the Soviet Union and its barbaric leader Stalin. They were overwhelmingly in evidence at the creation of the United Nations.”

In regard to elected officials Mr. Gannon observed that: “The CFR’s membership has produced Presidents Hoover, Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Nixon and presidential candidates Thomas Dewey, Henry A. Wallace, Wendell Wilkie, and Hubert Humphrey. In the Senate the voice of the CFR has been heard through Jacob Javits, Stuart Symington, Clifford Case and Gale McGee, among others. In the press media, the CFR viewpoint has been promoted by A. H. Sulzberger, Henry Luce, Gardner Cowles, Norman Cousins,…David Lawrence,…Whitelaw Reid, Eugene Meyer,…Philip Graham,…George Gallup, William L. Shirer,…Joseph Kraft, Walter Lippman, and Marquis Childs.” Bear in mind that this was written in 1969, so there are lots more of these media moles out there now quietly undermining state and national sovereignty and seeking to condition Americans to become part of the New World Order via the United Nations. Even at that, many of these names should be familiar to older folks who grew up in my generation.

Gannon has accurately described the CFR’s position on Communism as “jelly-soft.” Maybe he was being charitable here. And, at well publicized meetings over the years the CFR has had, as honored guests such leftist luminaries at Fidel Castro, Ghanas, Communist Prime Minister Kwame Nkrumah, and a whole klatch of other Communist and socialist officials from all over the world.

And Gannon concluded with “No matter the CFR project (the sellout of Southeast Asia; the socialization of Latin America; the support of civil rights revolutionists; rapprochement with Communist regimes) it is financed and extolled through the vast network of interlocking influences exerted by CFR members in tax-exempt foundations…in television and radio networks, in metropolitan newspapers, in mass magazines and scholarly journals, in major universities and publishing houses, in church organizations…This massive aggregate of control virtually precludes any effective opposition to CFR policies since no counter-inner circle exists even as a loyal opposition to the Ruling Establishment.”

Have you ever wondered why you get no media coverage of Ron Paul unless it is something negative? Have you ever wondered why, when Ron Paul finishes second in a primary the media dances all around, talking about how the people in first, third, and fourth places did so well? Wonder no more. Were it not for the Internet the CFR crowd and its paid prostitutes in the media would totally control the news and you would not even know Ron Paul existed, let alone be running for President.

Folks, you all had better start waking up to what is going on and who is controlling it, or one of these days you will wake up and find out that the One Worlders have completely taken over and it’s all over—at which point many of you will howl “why didn’t somebody tell us?” Some of us tried, but you didn’t want to hear it, so if the day ever comes that the Lord allows the socialists and Communists to take over the country (and that’s not a far-fetched possibility) as a judgment because we were not willing to stand up for what was right, don’t complain.

There are several books out there that you can find that deal with some of this. There is The Rockefeller File by Gary Allen, which although I believe it is out of print, I think it has been posted on the Internet. I believe None Dare Call it Conspiracy also by Gary Allen has been posted on the Internet. These will give you much background information about the people involved with the CFR.

Our Invisible Government—Part Two

By Al Benson Jr.

In the last article I noted how little most people have ever heard about the Council on Foreign Relations. It is truly one of our “news” media’s best kept secrets. In fact, I don’t know why we still insist in calling them the “news” media at this late date. Real news is the absolute last thing those people are about.

For an organization that has been around for as long as it has, the CFR is almost totally unknown. If you stopped 1000 people on the street and asked them about the CFR probably 997 of them would never have heard of it and the three that had would not have all that much information about it. But, then, that’s according to plan.

After World War 1 Woodrow Wilson and his alter-ego in the White House, Colonel Edward Mandell House (he was to Wilson what Kissinger was to Nixon) had come up with a plan to supposedly head off future wars. Dan Smoot has noted that: “In September, 1916, Wilson (at the urging of House) appointed a committee of intellectuals (the first President’s Brain Trust) to formulate peace terms and draw up a charter for world government. This committee, with House in charge, consisted of about 150 college professors, graduate students, lawyers, economists, writers, and others. Among them were men still familiar to Americans in the 1960s: Walter Lippmann (columnist); Norman Thomas (head of the American socialist party); Allen Dulles (former head of CIA); John Foster Dulles (late Secretary of State); Christian A. Herter (former Secretary of State)…These eager young intellectuals around Wilson, under the clear eyes of crafty Colonel House, drew up their charter for world government (League of Nations Covenant) and prepared for the brave new socialist one-world to follow after World War 1.” However, things did not quite work out the way they wanted at that time. When strictly constructed constitutionalists in the US Senate found out what was afoot they made it quite plain that the Senate would not authorize United States membership in this one-world scheme.

But these folks, when they have what they consider a messianic agenda, do not quit. They retrench and come back—again and again if necessary. The Americans came back from the Paris Peace Talks and formed the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921. So you see this outfit has been around for over 90 years and I will bet that, in all that time, not more than a dozen authoritative articles have appeared anywhere in our “news” media. Our “investigative media” have had much more important things to deal with—everything from flappers to reality shows, and the public remains mostly ignorant. If you are surprised you shouldn’t be.

The CFR hardly amounted to a hill of beans until 1927. That’s when the Rockefeller family, through their various foundations, began pouring money into it. Not to be outdone, the Carnegie and Ford foundations followed suit. Dan Smoot noted: “In 1939 the Council began taking over the U.S. State Department.” This is the same State Department that gave us Communist spy Alger Hiss.

Smoot observed that: “The crowing moment of achievement for the Council came at San Francisco in 1945, where over 40 members of the United States delegation to the organizational meeting of the United Nations (where the United Nations Charter was written) were members of the Council…By 1945 the Council on Foreign Relations, and various foundations and other organizations interlocked with it, had virtually taken over the U.S. State Department. Some CFR members were later identified as Soviet espionage agents: for example Alger Hiss and Lauchlin Currie. Other Council on Foreign Relations members—Owen Lattimore, for example—with powerful influence in the Roosevelt and Truman administrations, were subsequently identified, not as actual communists or Soviet espionage agents, but as ‘conscious, articulate instruments of the Soviet international conspiracy.’” In other words, they were not “useful idiots.” They knew what they are doing.

Dan Smoot made an accurate observation when he noted “The fact, however, that communists, Soviet espionage agents, and pro-communists could work inconspicuously for many years as influential members of the Council indicates something very significant about the Council’s objectives. The ultimate aim of the Council on Foreign Relations (however well-intentioned its prominent and powerful members may be) is the same as the ultimate aim of international communism: to create a one-world socialist system and make the United States an official part of it.” That about sums it up, and the current objectives of the CFR are no different. How many former presidents have been CFR members? Eisenhower was one, and if Nixon wasn’t then his alter-ego Kissinger was.

Lots of this information is out there on the Internet. Go and check some of it out. This sort of thing will have a lasting effect on you and your children and grandchildren. You need to be aware of who these people are and what they are all about.