Cultural Marxist Richmond Mayor Caves In–Did you honestly expect anything different?

by Al Benson Jr.

Member Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Just last evening I received an article from the Virginia Flaggers which illustrated our continuing problem with cultural Marxism this year in the South.

The article stated, in part, that: “Following the lead of disgraced New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu, Mayor Levar Stoney has chosen to tow the PC line of the NAACP and SPLC, who have supported the false narrative that our monuments and memorials are somehow tied to ‘racism, slavery, Jim Crow, and white supremacy.’ This false narrative has gained traction with the left, who has successfully used it to convince politicians to take  up their cause of attempting to remove every trace of the Confederacy from public view. Mr. Stoney appears to have caved to their pressure.”

The article went on to note the overwhelming support of the vast majority of citizens in Virginia who just want their monuments left alone. But let’s face it, folks, that is not going to happen because that does not suit the agenda of the Far Left. The article said that the fake narrative of what the monuments are all about “gained traction” with the Left. From what I have read and seen over the last thirty years or so, the false narrative about our monuments and flags was originated by the Left. They didn’t just happen to latch onto it as it moved on by–they started the movement to begin with. Let us not hesitate to give credit where it is due!

With all this in mind, I did a little digging to see if I could find out where Mayor Stoney was coming from prior to his being elected as Mayor of  Richmond, Virginia. It wasn’t that hard to find and it turned out to be pretty much what I expected.

Turns out that Stoney worked as an organizer for the 2004 campaign of John Kerry. According to Wikipedia ” In 2004  Stoney traveled to Wisconsin to work with the local Democratic Party in a ‘get out the vote’ effort. Five of his colleagues would later be charged with slashing the tires of a van meant to be used to drive Republican voters to the polls. Stoney initially lied to police claiming he had no knowledge of the incident. He would later admit to FBI investigators that he was present in the Democratic campaign offices after his colleagues came in to brag about slashing the tires.  Stoney then went on to testify against his colleagues…After questioning during a committee meeting with Virginia Republican lawmakers about his indiscretion, it was accepted as ‘an isolated, youthful mistake’.” It may have been a mistake, but let’s don’t kid ourselves, Mayor Stoney, as his background shows,  is a cultural Marxist. Later he worked for the Democratic Party of Virginia for three years, where he ended up being the Executive Director. In that capacity he worked handily with Barack Obama’s presidential campaign back in 2008.

He won his mayorship in Richmond against seven other candidates–with 35% of the vote. Hardly a landslide!

He can’t take Richmond’s Confederate monuments down–there is a law in Virginia that prevents that. So as long as he is unable to remove them, he will declare his cultural Marxist jihad against them in another way–under the guise of presenting “context” about the monuments, he will issue disingenuous prevarications regarding them. In other words, whatever “context” will, in the future, be presented regarding Confederate monuments, it will, shall we say, be slightly less than accurate. If we understand (and we should be learning by now) how the cultural Marxists operate, this should not surprise us in the least. It would be worthwhile, if somehow it could be done, for there to be opposing contexts presented about the monuments so that people viewing them would have both sides of the story and thus be able to make up their own minds. However, the Left is not about presenting any side but its own. For them there is no other side!

We have to realize (which we should have done before now) that the cultural Marxists and those who finance them are never going to cease and desist. The total destruction of Southern and Christian culture is a major part of their program, and so our resistance to what they do must be ongoing.

Finding private property to erect our monuments and fly our flags should end up being a major priority for us. It may not be easy, but somehow we are going to have to do it. To quit fighting those people is to turn your grandchildren’s futures over to the cultural Marxists, and I don’t know about you, but such a solution for my grandchildren is morally reprehensible to me. Even worse, it would be immoral for us to settle for that.

My wife and I usually do a short devotion from the Scriptures in the evening after supper, something from the Old Testament and then something from the New Testament. Last evening the New Testament part of our reading was from Luke, chapter 4, having to do with the devil tempting Jesus in the wilderness. It ended with verse 13, which said: “And when the devil had ended all the temptation, he departed from him for a season.” I don’t think it violates Scripture to believe that this session in the wilderness was not the last time Satan sought to tempt, pressure and persecute Jesus. There would be other times down the road, we just aren’t told about them. The point here being that the devil didn’t give up or quit, even though Jesus defeated him in the end, he didn’t quit. After reading that, the thought crossed my mind that “the devil was a cultural Marxist, ” or even more accurately you could say that he was the father of cultural Marxism.

The Religious Faith of the Left

by Al Benson Jr.

Member Board of Directors Confederate Society of America

As we witness the destruction caused by the Leftists in their demonstrations and riots around the country, their vitriol toward Donald Trump, and their seemingly irrational hatred of anything good and decent, we are forced to admit, whether we want to or not, that these people have an underlying theological belief to all that they have done and are doing. Their continuing destruction is but one method of faith and practice that shows us the theological nature of what they do.

Their seemingly senseless (not really) attacks on any system of belief save their own is something that transcends mere political or economic opposition. They are acting out their theology, and not theirs alone, but also the theology of those who finance much of their destruction. They are acting out the theology of their father, the one Saul Alinsky dedicated his book Rules for Radicals to. Some of them probably don’t have a clue about this. Many do.

The acting out of this theology is not a new thing in this country, or in Europe, or anywhere else for that matter. You can trace it back to the Tower of Babel in Genesis 11 in the Holy Scriptures. At that point the Lord showed them what He thought of their feeble effort at One World Government by confusing their languages and having them separate from one another. However, due to their sinful natures, their descendants did not learn and they still haven’t, and so eruptions of this Luciferian theology have continued down through the ages, some more apparent than others.

One manifestation that showed up in Europe in the late 1700s in what we know as the French Revolution. The fomenters of that horrendous event hated the biblical concept of original sin and so to rid themselves of that truth they sought to implement a whole new religious system. They wouldn’t have called it that but that’s what it really was. In their new system they became god, deciding what was good and evil. We all know how that worked out.

Another Luciferian manifestation showed up in several countries in Europe in 1848-49, where attempts were made to overthrow existing legitimate governments and replace them with centralized, collectivist regimes. And please don’t tell me that was all about “peace, freedom and democracy.” I know better. That same year Karl Marx had the Communist Manifesto published. At that point, Marx was little more than a hack writer and all he did with the manifesto was to promote the theology of those who hired him to write it. The thoughts in it were probably not mostly his own. They were the theology and commandments of  group called The League of the Just, which had ties to the Illuminati.  Marx’s name did not even appear on the first edition.

Lots of people that sought to overthrow their governments in Europe at that point, when their revolts failed, ended up coming to this country and they brought their Luciferian theology with them and continued to spread it, not only throughout the 1850s but also after the War of Northern Aggression started. Many of them jointed the Union armies and became generals and high priests of their theology both during the War and after.

Those who think that War was strictly fought over economic issues have not fully grasped what it was really all about. It was a war to destroy the Southern states and their history, heritage and culture–a culture and heritage that, for all its faults, was undeniably Christian in its worldview. A Christian South was something that the practitioners of Leftist theology simply could not put up with.  The Christian worldview of the South, and wherever else it resided in the country had to go. It was an impediment to the spread of Leftist theology. And that theology was best expressed in the ten points Marx wrote about in the manifesto the League of the Just had hired him to write.

If you haven’t done so you should get a copy of the Communist Manifesto sometime and read it. Now Marx was as dull a writer as you’d find. Reading his stuff is somewhat less exciting than sitting and watching paint dry, but, when he came to the ten points previously mentioned, he was quite succinct in outlining them. Check them over and see if you can tell how many of them have already been enacted into law in this country–all the way from the “heavy, progressive graduated income tax” to “free education for all children in public schools.”

The theology that governed Marx and those who followed him is the same theology that governs the Trump-haters in our day. It’s the same theology that allows for millions of unborn children to be aborted (murdered) every year for the sake of “convenience.”  It’s the same theology that allows those on the Left to shoot congressmen because they have introduced legislation to do away with Elite Pedophilia. According to an article on http://www.wnd.com the man who shot Congressman Steve Scalise had a “kill list” of Republicans he wanted to assassinate, mostly members of the Freedom Caucus. You have to understand, in the Leftist religion, political assassinations of your enemies are high sacraments, surpassed only by those sacraments that allow for even more bloodletting, like riots in cities, which some of Lucifer’s disciples willingly finance.

Now I realize that lots of folks, when they see that this article is about religion, will not bother to read it–too weighty a subject for them. It’s even too weighty for many Christians, because many of our churches have managed to dumb down their congregations just like the public schools have dumbed down their students. But, maybe a few courageous souls will make the effort to wade through it. It is for these few that it is written.

 

The “Compassionate” Left Just Shoots its Enemies

by Al Benson Jr.                                                                                                                   Member Board of Directors Confederate Society of America

In recent weeks it has really been displayed as to how truly “compassionate” and really open to “diversity” the political and theological Left really is. When all else fails, why just shoot your adversaries or perceived adversaries and then blame your actions on someone else’s actions or words. Of course the Leftists could just say “the Devil made me do it” and that would be pretty accurate, but preferring anything to honesty, the Leftists blather on about how “Trump made me do it” or “the Second Amendment forced me to take action so we could work at getting rid of it” or whatever other canned response they are supposed to give. To say that the Leftists and those who finance their actions are totally despicable is to state the case too mildly.  What those people really are is just not printable in this article so I will leave it to your imagination.

In recent weeks we have noted their words and actions toward Donald Trump. Had those words and actions been expended against Hitlery or Obama they would have been deemed a hate crime of grossest proportions. But, because those actions were taken against someone on the Right politically, they are not only perfectly acceptable, but the mainstream media simply adores them. This is cultural Marxism in living color, folks. This is one classic example of how it works.

That media “useful idiot” that held up the imitation of Trump’s bloody, decapitated head, even though she lost her job over it, is hailed as a glowing example of Leftist “diversity” and, no doubt, that Bernie Sanders supporter who shot Congressman Scalise  and several others this morning will be held up as yet another icon for the deranged Left to imitate. A comment on LewRockell.com this morning noted that “the cold civil war is turning hot.” When CNN, the epitome of fake news, reported on this morning’s shootings all they could say was “the gun kept shooting.” As though, somehow, the shooting was the fault of the gun rather than the man pulling the trigger!

Then there is that play in New York where President Trump gets assassinated on stage every evening. But that’s okay as long as the president is Trump. What do you think the reaction would be if the president in the play were Obama or Clinton? That would be treated as the hate crime of the century and the producers of the play would probably end up in the slammer, but because Trump is the president getting offed nightly it all gets a pass.

And there have been reports via the media, alternative and otherwise, that there could be a possible assassination attempt on Mr. Trump’s life. It’s a known fact that if the Leftists can’t get what they want any other way they are prone to try to remove obstacles to their agendas via assassination. So for them to make an attempt on Trump would be right up their alley. This is how they treat those who would dare to disagree with their version of how things should be done.

When the Leftists and those who finance them can’t get their way in some big city they stage a “peaceful protest” (read that riot)  and they destroy property and sometimes lives. This is what the Left always does. They are unable to create anything except mayhem and destruction–but that’s really what they are there for–as a tool of destruction to pave the way so that those who pay them for the destruction will then have a clear path to construct the “New World Order.” So the Leftists are bought and paid for–political prostitutes as it were. Now admittedly, they think more of themselves than that, but those who pay them don’t.

The shock troops of the Left may well end up starting a civil war in this country. There was a time when they could get totally away with all this evil, and it IS evil, so let’s don’t sugarcoat it with any of those pleasant-sounding Leftist euphemisms. However, that time has probably passed. The alternative media has done yeoman duty in alerting millions of Americans to much of what is going on, whereas, back when Nixon was forced out of office, there was hardly any alternative media to speak of. Now, thanks be to God, it is all over the place. There are many folks that don’t like InfoWars.com but the fact remains that they get something like 45 million viewers every month.  And then you have Breitbart, the Drudge Report, WorldNetDaily and a whole host of smaller ones that, believe it or not, actually expose what the Left and its financiers are doing. That’s the reason why Obama and his fellow Leftists wanted so badly to regulate the Internet–so they could begin to cut down on all the exposure the Leftists had been getting. They absolutely hate it when they realize you know what they are doing because it makes it that much harder for them to pull off.

One thing the Left hates is exposure (Ephesians 5:11), people learning about and exposing the evil they try to perpetrate daily. This is one way to fight back against them, exposing what they do and the reasons they do it, and, where possible, exposing those people that financially  enable them to do it.

There are some Christians that work at doing this. There needs to be more.

Good News From Alabama After New Orleans’ Political Correctness

by Al Benson Jr.

Many of us have watched, almost dumbstruck, at the rampant cultural genocide being displayed in New Orleans. The cultural Marxists there, from the mayor on down, have simply run amuck, basically doing what they wanted the way they wanted. To label them as culture destroyers is almost too charitable. I am sure that, along with myself, many others would describe their activities and personalities in language that I would hesitate to have reproduced in this article.

Their execrable attempts at the total destruction of Southern and Confederate history and heritage almost border on the insane–but then, they are cultural Marxists, so I guess that is par for the course.

An article on http://constitution.com for May 20th was quite perceptive. It noted: “The left has spent countless decades attempting to vilify the South by publicly shaming them for slavery that ’caused the Civil War’ when, in fact, the war itself was truly and unequivocally a result of northern lawmakers’ attempts to sabotage the sovereignty provided by states’ rights was the nation continued westward in Manifest Destiny.” The fact that all the original thirteen colonies, north and south, had slaves at one point is never mentioned, nor is the fact that some slave states remained in the Union while Lincoln supposedly “fought to free the slaves.” The Establishment, educational and otherwise, does not want us to dwell too much on such facts, and so, in this regard, in our day and age, most “history” books lie to us.

The Constitution article noted: “In this quest to keep Southerners under their thumb, and under the auspices of ‘political correctness’ liberals the nation over have begun demanding that statues, monuments, and celebrations with Confederate subject matter be swept under the rug or destroyed all together. It is the epitome of revisionist history, and it is a menace to our nation’s future.” And don’t think the cultural Marxists are not aware of that. They are, because such is their agenda. Those people want to destroy your culture and your children’s future, and what’s more, they want to enjoy themselves doing it!

So while they have “made hay while the moon shines” in New Orleans, they have not done quite so well in Alabama. The Constitution article tells us: “Alabama lawmakers on Friday approved sweeping protections for Confederate monuments, names and other historic memorials,…The measure ‘would prohibit the relocation, removal, alteration, renaming, or other disturbance of any architecturally significant building, memorial street, or monument that has stood on public property for 40 or more years,’ it reads.”

The article noted that “African-American lawmakers opposed the bill at every step of the legislative process,  saying it solidifies a shameful legacy of slavery.” This line of bull is one of the few weapons the political left has and they have used it so often for so long that the luster is beginning to wear off the sword. One of those opposed to this bill was Hank Sanders, a well-known leftist from Selma. he and his daughter, Rose,  were instrumental in trying to keep the Nathan Bedford Forrest bust on Confederate Circle in Selma from being put back up after someone had stolen it. They were unsuccessful with that effort, too, but it sure wasn’t for lack of trying. If, as the Constitution article said, “African-American lawmakers” opposed this bill, you have to wonder how many of the African-American lawmakers in Alabama are leftists. Maybe someone in Alabama can do some kind of study on that.

It should have occurred to most Southern folks by now that those trying to destroy our monuments and eventually our culture,  are leftists of one stripe or another–liberals who don’t have the guts to become outright communists, as well as socialists, fascists,  and those who are outright communists, along with all manner of “useful idiots” who, in their exalted brilliance, just don’t know the difference and are naive enough to still think, in spite of world history, that communism is actually an expression of “peace and freedom.” Then there are those trying to destroy our heritage who are actually being paid by certain Elitist groups to do it. I won’t mention any names here, but the head of one (or several) of these groups has a last name with only five letters in it and he worked for the Nazis during World War 2.

Folks, we have got to get it through our heads that these are not just ordinary people with a different viewpoint than ours, people you can sit down and dialogue with over your differences. These people have an agenda that calls for your destruction culturally, and eventually probably physically once they feel they have the power. Their agenda will never be dialogue with you–it will always be your ultimate destruction.

This new bill in Alabama is resistance to their program. They understand that. Resistance is one thing they do understand. Praise God that Alabama has done what she did in this instance. The rest of the Southern states, those not thoroughly co-opted by the left and the Deep State, need to start doing the same thing. If their watch-word is “destruction” then ours needs to be “resistance.”

The Constitution article also noted that the monuments in New Orleans are being removed “at the behest of left-leaning groups.” So you and your culture are basically under communist assault. This is not just a batch of local black folks that want equal treatment at the local level–this is a communist assault on our culture and we had better wake up and grasp that fact pretty soon!

Common Sense? The Power of Prayer? Or Both?

by Al Benson Jr.

My last two posts, on April 8th and 11th were both understandably negative given what seemed to be transpiring. It seemed as if Trump had totally jumped the traces and was totally into “nation-building” and out of  the “America First” business. It was inconceivable to me how he could have turned so quickly.

The folks that were praying for him I urged to keep on praying for him, that he would have the wisdom to do the right thing.

Either the power of prayer, or good old common sense, or both, prevailed–at least for now. I expect this problem to arise again, if not with Syria then with some other hot spot somewhere in the world. Mr. Trump has so few good advisers that will point him the right way and so many bad advisers that are more than anxious to push him into starting World War 3 that this is going to be an ongoing struggle for him. Quite frankly, he has lots of folks giving him bad advice that he’d be lots better off without. He’s be lots better off if he cleared them out of the White House and awarded them all ambassadorships to Lower Slobovia or East Overshoe or some other such location–someplace the damage they do could be limited. And I am not talking here about Steve Bannon. His vision here is more in line with Mr. Trump’s than it is with the Neo-cons who are trying to start the next war.

If we fight another war and it’s a nuclear war, maybe some of these war-mongers have got bomb-proof shelters they can go crawl into. What about the rest of us? They couldn’t care less as long as they get their war.

Anyway, according to an article by Michael Goodwin in the New York Post Mr. Trump is not planning an invasion of Syria. He is quoted in the article as saying “We’re not going into Syria, Our policy is the same–it hasn’t changed. We’re not going into Syria…Our big mission is getting rid of ISIS. That’s where it’s always been…”

And Rex Tillerson said on Sunday, April 9th that he still stood behind: “a political process that we believe the Syrian people will lawfully be able to decide the fate of Assad.” That is as it should be, whether foaming at the mouth liberals (socialists) and Neo-Cons like it or not. It’s not up to us to be running all over the world saying who can rule here or there and who can’t. Quite frankly, most of it is none of our damned business! And we wonder why the rest of the world hates Americans! It’s because we are always sticking our noses in someplace they aren’t wanted. This country has a Yankee/Marxist mentality. We think everybody else’s business is our concern. This attitude has abounded since the War of Northern Aggression.

So keep praying that the President will get the counsel and advice he needs to govern wisely and that the Lord will be pleased to shut the mouths of those who want more wars and foreign entanglements and eventually, a New World Order.

Something Smells Rotten in Syria (and in Washington, too)

by Al Benson Jr.

By now almost everyone still breathing has to have heard about this gas attack in Syria. Everyone is screaming that Assad did it, but as is the case with the fake story of Trump and his Russian connections, I have not seen any real evidence yet. Emotional outbursts there have been in abundance, but let’s see some evidence. There was none with the “Trump and the Russians” scenario, so let’s see some with this gas attack that proves that Assad did it. They say that Assad has that sarin gas used in the attack. He probably does, but ISIS has it too, or at least some possibly watered-down form of it.

The reports I’ve heard say that Assad has been winning his war against ISIS. Not that the news media would ever report that. But, if that is the case, why would he then turn around and pull a bonehead stunt like this one that will set everything back for him and get the Americans mad at him? It makes no earthly sense!

And something else bothers me about all this. All of a sudden all the people in Washington that hated Trump’s guts; McCain, Pelosi, Schumer, and a whole batch of other slithery Leftist creatures who couldn’t say enough bad things about him re now, all of a sudden, staunchly in his corner and they just love what he is doing in Syria Does that tell you anything??? It tells me that they have finally found some way to co-opt him, whether through his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, which I have seen reports of, or in some other way. All of a sudden Trump is dealing with the very folks that, a month ago, were working to slit his political throat. And his core concept of making America great again  seems to be going by the wayside in favor of the neo-con’s “nation building” program in the Middle East–the exact same game Comrade Obama played so very well, as did Bush 2 before him.

Interestingly enough, on http://www.garynorth.com for April 8th, Mr. North noted: “Donald Trump campaigned on the promise he would ‘bomb the hell out of ISIS.’ Instead he bombed installations of the Syrian government. This was on April 6, 2017–one hundred years to the day after the House voted for war with Germany.” This gas attack has “false flag” written all over it!

Back when Slick Willie was in office and having his problems over “that woman” Monica Lewinsky, and there was talk of his impeachment, Clinton “suddenly” decided to bomb Iraq–with “the unanimous support of his national security advisers.” Given the body count of those who had disagreed with the Clintons over something or other, would they have dared to say anything else? According to an article on http://www.dailymail.co.uk  for August 26, 2016: “The strikes–known as Operation Desert Fox–were ordered the day after the House of Representatives issued  report accusing the president of ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’ and ended the day the articles of impeachment were passed. Previous strikes in 1996, Operation Desert Strike, were ordered during a campaign finance scandal.” So it often seems that problems in the Middle East suddenly erupt when some scandal in Washington is about to erupt–and they are very convenient for focusing media and public attention on the Middle East, and away from the potential scandal problem. Understand, I am not accusing President Trump of anything, except possibly a lack of historical knowledge and probably taking bad advice from some family members, and those who have a vested interest in dragging us (and him) away from his “America first” agenda and back  into the New World Order agenda.

Consider this; there seems to be a growing possibility that this Susan Rice affair could turn out badly for Hillary and the other socialist Democrats and there has been mounting concern over that in the past couple weeks. How much have you seen in the prostitute press about that since this Syrian situation hit?

Mr. Trump has been a shrewd businessman (and I don’t mean that in a negative sense), but I don’t think he has yet grasped the totally devious nature of the political mind and how underhanded it can really be. That, and bad advice, for whatever reason, from his in-laws,  seems to be leading him down the New World Order’s garden path at this point. Let us pray the Lord will give him wisdom to see where all this is going, and that he might repent of it and return to his original vision–the one the voters put him into office to enact.

“Racist” Cows?

by Al Benson Jr.

We have been duly informed by the politically correct, the cultural Marxists among us, that anyone politically to the right of Ho Chi Minh or Fidel Castro is a “deplorable” racist. Evidence  for this accusation?  Well, who needs evidence? Just say it long enough and loud enough and people will believe it. The Social Justice warriors way over on the Far Left fringe have decreed it. Ain’t that enough? After all, who would even think of questioning “social justice” or its  provocateurs?

However, in recent days the social justice campaign seems to have reached new and more glorious  heights. According to the website Intellihub the animal rights group PETA has continued to add to its list of “unusual” claims, and this time they have put out a video that literally claims that drinking milk just might mean you are a closet racist. Intellihub recently said: “The group posted the video on Friday in a Tweet that reads, ‘Did you know that milk has long been a symbol used by white supremacists?”

Wow, I didn’t know that did you? Well, they say you learn something new every day (even if it is slightly off the wall). So now we have had the ultimate tool of the Far Right white supremacy crowd exposed for what it really is–Milk, white milk! Well, if it’s white it must be “racist” right?  I mean, everything white is racist isn’t it? Makes you wonder about snow doesn’t it?

So I thought, in view of this startling revelation that we ought to take this whole racist scenario one step further and expose yet another layer of deep-rooted racism–Cows!

I mean, after all, the brown cow eats green grass but she gives white milk, so it stands to reason, at least among the progressive Left, that the cow is racist too. Doesn’t it? What other logical conclusion could a devout cultural Marxist come up with? If she wasn’t racist couldn’t we, at least once in awhile, depend on chocolate milk from her? The fact that she continually provides only white milk must indicate that the cow, knowingly or not, has deep racist tendencies.  And what about her owner? He has to be a flaming racist too. Do we dare ask how many cows he has that only give white milk? Is there a right-wing conspiracy here among the agricultural set to flood the country with white milk? If so, this needs to be exposed. The Communist News Network should send out some hot-shot reporter, have him sneak around the dairy farm and get some samples of that white milk. Then he could have them tested for the amount of inherent racism they might contain. Anything over 50 grams per udderful would be enough to seal his journalistic career forever.

We must realize that this is a serious problem!  Racist milk from racist cows is flooding the country. Valiant anti-racists just can’t obtain brown, yellow, red, or black milk–all these miserable bovines today provide for us is this insipid, racist white stuff. Why it’s enough to gag a maggot!

The social justice folks need to start scratching around under the rocks and barrels to see if they can find a friend somewhere in Congress, one who might be ready to expose all this. Once they produce such a specimen he could introduce mandatory legislation nationwide that would force all daily farmers to inoculate their cows with something approved by the FDA that would turn the color of the milk given by cows into something besides white. I imagine, to the Flakes over on the leftist fringe, that would seem to be a reasonable solution to this horrible problem.

Seem to me I have seen an article or two in the local LameStream Media outlets that discussed in depth the traumatic experiences undergone by those that were forced to drink white milk. Having to drink white milk was more traumatic for them than someone having tipped over their little red wagons when they were three years old.

I know you can get chocolate and strawberry milk flavorings at the local super market, but even if you buy and use them, somehow it just isn’t the same when you realize the milk was white to begin with.

So there has to be some solution that could be introduced that would call for more federal regulation and at least one more layer of bureaucracy to ease the unemployment problems that Obama’s stimulus packages didn’t quite take care of.

I can see it now–pre-planned spontaneous street demonstrations all across the country, with people marching and carrying signs that say “White is Right; Strawberry is Red; and Chocolate is—whatever!” And you thought Trump’s Russian scenario was something!  Brother, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet!