The Demons Of Davos

by Al Benson Jr.

Attendance at the World Economic Forum conference in Davos is by invitation only. Nobody just stops in to see what’s going on there because no one is supposed to know except those invited there by Klaus Schwab and the elites. One site I looked at listed some of them, but I got a list from another site that listed all of them from the United States, as well as other countries.

The meeting this year was held in early January. I’ve noted in the past that both presidential candidate Nikki Haley and Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin, who might yet end up being a presidential candidate, had connections with the World Economic Forum. So when someone gets an invite to this exclusive political bash, you have to wonder why.

Former President Trump attended when he was president, but not now. It seems that US presidents get an invite to this because one article I read from Newsweek noted all those that had skipped going when they were president, notably Obama, the two Bush’s and China Joe–all Council on Foreign Relations members or surrogates. I suppose on those years they didn’t attend they were not to receive any marching orders from Schwab.

According to an article on http://www.technocracy.news the WEF predicts that “private property and privacy will vanish by 2030.” The article notes that, for the WEF, “free markets and individual choice do not stand as the top values, but state interventionism and collectivism. Individualism and private property are to disappear from this planet by 2030 according to the projections and scenarios coming from the World Economic Forum. Individual liberty is at risk again. What may lie ahead was projected in November 2016 when the WEF published ‘8 predictions for the world in 2030’…The scenario for the world in 2030 is more than just a forecast. It is a plan whose implementation has accelerated drastically since the announcement of a pandemic and the consequent lockdown.”

The timing almost makes you wonder if the pandemic was part of this plan all along! Have the Demons of Davos been working overtime, or were they just getting impatient? There is an article on the WEF page, under the Society and Equity heading for 4/26/23 that says “Agenda 2030: why civic participation is key to meeting UN sustainability targets.” The article notes: “Attacks on civil society and civic freedoms are threatening adequate progress being made on meeting the UN Sustainable Goals ( SDG’s). Agenda 2030 marks a rare moment of global unanimity with an emphasis of economic advancement, social progress and environmental sustainability.” You have to understand that these people don’t mean the same thing by these nice-sounding euphemisms that we do. If they are opposed to private property that also means they are opposed to private businesses. In other words, they want governmental control of property and business. There is no “economic advance” at all in such a system. In fact it is a step backwards, but they hope you don’t grasp that fact.

There is another article on http://www.weforum.org called “The Great Reset” which notes that “global stakeholders” in noting the consequences of the pandemic have started, via the World Economic Forum, something called the “Great Reset Initiative.” Some of you reading this will know about the Great Reset, and if you do, please feel free to comment about it in the comment section below my article. It is not something the average person should look forward to. So the WEF has an agenda that is anti-freedom and anti-private property. And its founder, Klaus Schwab is the person who says we should give up eating meat and start eating insects in order to save the planet. So what does that do to farmers and cattlemen? Take a wild guess! You have to wonder if Brother Schwab plans to do wat he advocates for the rest of us. My guess would be he doesn’t.

Anyway, enough of that. You should realize by now that the WEF is a major promoter of one world government, and not above using the United Nations to promote its leftist agenda. And in that effort it has invited some major US political figures to possibly be willing to partake of WEF’s efforts to promote world government. I can’t predict what these folks will ultimately do, but the fact they were invited to this WEF meeting says the WEF fondly hopes they share its globalist world view, without letting the folks back home know where they are really at.

Some of the people invited to this meeting were: John Kerry, Samantha Power, FBI Director Christopher Wray, Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, Republican Congressman Darrell Issa, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, Illinois Governor J. B. Pritzker, West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin, Arizona Senator Krysten Sinema, Republican Congressman Mike Gallagher from Wisconsin, Marian Walsh, Secretary of Labor, Avril Haines U.S. Director of National Intelligence, James Risch Senator from Idaho, Maria Elvira Salazer Republican Congresswoman from Florida. This isn’t the whole list but it will give you some idea of the kind of people that get invited to a WEF conference. And I must admit, I wonder why these people? What does the WEF see in these particular people that it wants them at its conference? Do these folks harbor one world government tendencies that we’ve never been told about? Will they be willing to participate in some way in a one world government agenda? I think they need to be asked about that–especially the senators and congresspersons. We need to know just where they are really coming from. Do they take their oaths to uphold the Constitution seriously–or are they–in fact–some of the one world government Demons from Davos???

Advertisement

Reparations Is A Total Scam!

by Al Benson Jr.

According to Wikipedia, Rep. Cori Bush from Missouri is a Black Lives Matter activist. She is also a willing participant in the ongoing “reparations” scam. In pending legislation Rep. Bush called on Congress to adopt measures “aimed at righting historic wrongs, including urging the federal government to issue federal reparations to black Americans…a minimum of $14 trillion would be needed ‘to eliminate the racial wealth gap that currently exists between black and white Americans’ the resolution argues! This bill, HR 414, is ridiculous and needs to be voted down resoundingly! Where does this woman think this $14 trillion is coming from, the Tooth Fairy? Or does she think the government can just print it and pass it out? If she does, does she have any idea of what such an act will do to the inflation level in this country? And the rank inflation won’t only hit white folks!

The “reparations scam” is just that–a scam. In an article on http://www.townhall.com for 5/11/23, writer Bob Barr, a former member of Congress, observed: “Neither history nor common sense mean anything to those demanding ‘racial reparations,’…” Barr then went on to list all the civil rights legislation, from the second 13th Amendment up to and including the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Barr duly noted: “In much the same way that junk science has provided the justification for New York Governor Kathy Hochul to ban the use of natural gas in new construction, ‘junk history’ is at the center of the racial reparations movement…At a recent public forum where Californians could comment on the proposed handouts (reparations) a ‘Rev. Tony Peirce’ boisterously demanded that the only fair dollar figure to be apportioned to him and his fellow black citizens was $200 million apiece…this episode encapsulates the junk history on which reparations advocates appear to justify their cause–that the anecdotal ’40 acres and a mule of 1865 is today worth a cool $200 million. It is doubtful Rev. Peirce or many of the others clamoring for massive monetary reparations for past–and in fact, continuing–wrongs understand or much care about the actual historic context or meaning of the ‘forty acres and a mule’ narrative.” To these people “history” is just another meaningless word. They want the cash, baby, and they want it now!

According to http://www.californiapolicycenter.org for 1/5/23 “California is considering paying ‘reparations’ to black Californians who are directly descended from enslaved people, which may surprise most Californians. After all, slavery was never legal in the Golden State.” But that fact makes no difference whatever. Governor Newsome feels he has a golden opportunity to garner black votes whether he decides to run for president (if the Democratic establishment lets him) or just run for governor again.

The article noted, quite accurately, that “To understand how slavery is applicable to California one must sift through the reports 500 pages of convoluted logic common to the victim industry in America…” The “report” goes into how slavery continues to “physically and mentally harm African Americans today.” And the article observes, again, accurately, that “The task force is not recommending reparations for slavery, but rather for discrimination.” The entire reparations scam is an exercise in political bovine fertilizer! In California it amounts to a giant vote-buying scam, as well as a major split in race relations, which may also be an alternate reason for it. And who will pay for all these black folks in California getting $200 million apiece–will it be white folks, Hispanic folks, and Oriental folks? That’ll go over real big with them!

An article on http://www.nypost.com for 4/30/22 duly observed that: “Ten years ago, the idea of ‘reparations’ sat on the political fringe in America. The question of whether or not compensation should have been paid to former slaves had died out. Not least because by the start of the 21st century no one in America had actually suffered from slavery…But there’s a tendency in our own age which does not allow wounds to mend or heal. Indeed, there is a movement that locates long-healed wounds in order to rip them open again. And then complain about the hurt caused to themselves.” And of course, the idea of scamming big bucks from people who never had anything to do with slavery really appeals to them. They want to be able to laugh at us poor suckers all the way to the bank. We want that cash, baby, anyway we can get it–honest, dishonest, makes no difference!

Every race of people in the world has either practiced slavery and been enslaved to some extent. Do they all deserve reparations? If not, why not? Why is it only blacks that deserve it? Every other race has put the issues of slavery and discrimination behind them, but not blacks (and all blacks don’t fit into this category) but many blacks seem to thrive on it. It’s like they have a never-ending grievance with the rest of the world and want to be paid to forget it (if ever they will).

The leftists among us, (to which our public schools are adding a growing number) are using this issue to divide the races one from the other, so we wont ever sit down together and talk to one another about how all of us are being taken to the cleaners. Reparations is a big part of the leftist agenda to cause racial division and we need to expose it for the racial scam that it is.

The “News” Media–Part Of The Ruling Class

by Al Benson Jr.

According to http://www.swprs.org “Largely unbeknownst to the general public, executives and top journalists of almost all media outlets have long been members of the influential Council on Foreign Relations…” Now that would be an expose for Fox News to deal with, but don’t hold your breath waiting for it to happen. This may be forbidden territory to the vast percentage of our “news” media.

The article continues: “The CFR and its close to 5,000 elite members for decades have shaped US foreign policy…As a well-known Council member famously explained, they transformed the American republic into a global empire, albeit a benevolent one.” I’m afraid many would legitimately quibble about how “benevolent” the US “empire” has really been.

In a column entitled “Ruling Class Journalists” a former Washington Post senior editor, Richard Harwood, told his readers that the CFR and its members were “the nearest thing we have to a ruling establishment in the United States.” That’s quite an admission. And the average person remains blissfully unaware–and that on purpose! Harwood continued: “The membership of these journalists in the Council …is an acknowledgement of their active and important role in public affairs and of their ascendency into the American ruling class,…They are part of that establishment whether they like it or not, sharing most of its values and world views.” And I imagine, from what I’ve seen of some “journalists” so called, they pretty much like it.

Important CFR members have included several presidents and vice-presidents, almost all secretaries of state, treasury, and defense, many influential members of Congress, and practically all CIA directors, U.N. ambassadors, chairpersons of the Federal Reserve, presidents of the World Bank…many prominent academics in areas such as economics and political science.” Truly a group of unelected rulers. Interestingly enough, the CFR had “key members of both the 9/11 Commission and the Warren Commission.

The article went on regarding CFR members who had been president when it said: “Thus in 1993 former CFR director George H. W. Bush was followed by CFR member Bill Clinton, who in turn was followed by CFR ‘family member’ George W. Bush. In 2008, CFR member John McCain lost against CFR candidate of choice, Barack Obama…It was not until 2016 that the Council failed to prevail.” Does that tell you a little about why the ruling establishment (the Deep State) has been so adamantly opposed to Donald Trump? He wasn’t “one of the boys” and so couldn’t be depended on to play the game according to CFR rules.

But when you look at all this, you have to begin to realize that we have indeed been the victims of unelected rulers. Understanding that the Council on Foreign Relations was originally formed back in the early 1900s to guide this country into a one world government, you have to ask–if in a presidential election–both candidates belong to the CFR, what choice does the electorate really have? You can vote for socialist candidate A or socialist candidate B. Some choice and you will get screwed either way!

I said at the beginning of this article it would be a good topic for an expose on Fox News. I don’t expect that to happen anytime soon, given the direction Fox seems to be headed in. I wonder if this topic would be important to Tucker Carlson if he grasped the implications of unelected rulers in America.

George Orwell And Controlling “History”

by Al Benson Jr.

George Orwell said “Who controls the past controls the future and who controls the present controls the past.” Someone named Bedaant Stivasten in http://www.linkedin.com commented on Orwell’s quote. He said, in part, “Those who control the way history is recorded and told, have the power to shape people’s understanding of the past and influence their decisions for the present. For example, governments and political leaders often attempt to control the way this history is taught in schools and presented to the public in order to shape public opinion and maintain their power.”

He also noted that media outlets have this same power. They decide what stories are told and how they are told. He also observed: “While the past cannot be completely controlled, those who seek to do so must be careful not to push their narratives too far, and risk undermining their efforts.” I don’t think those trying to control the past have heeded his advice. They may be sure at this point that their brainwashed audience will blindly accept most anything they say.

I don’t know anything about this man, other than he is involved in digital marketing and has a name I can’t pronounce. But wherever he is coming from, his commentary on this subject is pretty accurate. You could almost say, in this context, that the winners in any given struggle get to write the history books dealing with it.

It has also been said on http://www.ennyman.medium.com that “When future historians write about the 20th century it would not surprise me to find it had been nicknamed ‘the century of spin’. Today more than ever we see that the battle for the minds of the people revolves around the manner in which events get interpreted, not necessarily the events themselves.” Thus wrote someone named Ed Newman, and he is also on target.

The comments of these two individuals can readily be applied to most of the “history” we have been taught in the last 150 years. We’ve been taught that the North fought the War of Northern Aggression to free the slaves. They didn’t. They fought it so Lincoln could keep his tariffs and collect his duties in Southern ports because the South was paying most of the expenses for the whole country and Lincoln didn’t want to lose that revenue. Ask almost any youngster (and I’ve done this) what that war was fought over and he will dutifully answer “slavery.” That’s what he/she was taught in school. Most adults will say the same thing because that’s what they were taught. This is a prime example of controlled (and inaccurate) history. And your future decisions about that war and its consequences will be made based on faulty history. That’s how this game works. This is how those in power today control your past–and future.

In the context of the 20th century, it might be an interesting exercise for someone to check out how many newspapers or television or radio programs are controlled or influenced by someone who is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

The website http://www.thefreethoughtproject.com carried an article on 6/4/2018 about how the Council on Foreign Relations advocated that the U.S. government should propagandize its own people. So typical of an organization that promotes the concept of one world government! Another article about the CFR appeared on http://www.ratherexposethem.org on 5/30/21 by William F. Jasper. This one is especially worth reading as it goes into China Joe Biden–the CFR’s man in the White House. And one final one from http://www.mintpressnews.com from 3/1/2018 by James Carey about how the CFR is pushing for a new cold war with Russia. Trump didn’t fall for this one but China Joe Biden is all in for it. But don’t expect the real story from our “news” media–only the establishment spin on the real story!

The entire intent of the CFR is to influence Americans to jettison their unique history, heritage, and culture and be willing to submerge themselves and their posterity into a socialist one world government. This is what the CFR plans for your future. And George Orwell nailed it. If people don’t understand their past and most today don’t then you can work to design your version of the future for them and they won’t realize how horrendous your plan for their future is.

Invaded!

by Al Benson Jr.

This country is about to be invaded! I saw one news item on television that said there were 150,000 illegals in northern Mexico awaiting the expulsion of Title 42 so they can, basically, invade this country. I don’t know if that figure is totally accurate or not. However, the Border Patrol said it had apprehended 10,000 on each of the last two days somaybe it isn’t all that far out of line.

The news said that Biden has directed officials to release illegal aliens without trying to track them. Biden admits when Title 42 ends the border will be chaotic. Thats an understatement! It will be an invasion–one that Biden dreams about. Thousands upon thousands of untracked illegal aliens. Biden drools with anticipation!

He has done and will do nothing to stop this. Now, if he can only get a bill through Congress that will permit these illegals to vote here sans citizenship, he can use them to overthrow the country via the voting booth–a mostly bloodless revolution. This will affect the whole country. Every city will be a border city with illegals coming out of the woodwork!

You have to consider the possibility that the job the Deep State gave him was to tear down the country as we know it and replace it with the abomination we know as socialism–while he laughs all the way to the bank so he can cash those fat Chinese checcccks!

Has Fox News Become Part Of The “Controlled Opposition”?

by Al Benson Jr.

I watched one of the programs on Fox News last evening, 4/30. The program’s host asked a couple interesting questions. He asked if bureaucrats and staffers (unelected rulers) are really those responsible for running the Biden juggernaut. It was a good question but he didn’t take it far enough. Of course had he taken it further Fox might have pulled a Tucker Carlson on him and he’d have been gone too. Those on Fox that want to keep their jobs are in the process of learning just how far they can go before losing those jobs. Which means they are, indeed, the “controlled” opposition.

As far as unelected people running the Biden Regime–what about people who are members of the Council on Foreign Relations? The Fox host never mentioned the CFR and I wondered as I watched him–is he even aware of this group, and if so, why are they left out of the equation of who influences the Biden Regime? They shouldn’t be.

Arthur R. Thompson, in his 2021 book Benedict Biden: Water Carrier For The New World Order goes into some detail about the CFR and the influence they are having on the Biden Regime. Mr. Thompson observes: “However, there is a more dangerous group subtly filling slots in the Biden administration, from top to bottom–members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). It is not only what these members believe in, it is that they follow an agenda designed to bring to fruition a one-world government–regardless of any administration’s stated beliefs. Basically, the CFR was created to convince the American people to become part of a one-world government, the New World Order (their words, not ours)…Today this scheme of a one-world government is embodied in the United Nations. Most of the agencies of the UN are run by socialists and communists, and the Chinese communists hold more agency chairs than any other country.”..

Mr. Thompson continued: “..Keep in mind the power of each of these positions, and that the goal of the CFR is to take away American independence and transfer it to the UN.” Some of the CFR people in positions of power in the Biden regime are: “CIA Director William J. Burns; National Economic Advisor Cecilia E. Rouse; Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen; Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome H. Powell; Secretary of Commerce Gina M. Raimondo; Secretary of Defense Gen. Lloyd J. Austin, III; Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken; Deputy Secretary of State Wendy R. Sherman…One could say that the CFR has effective control over the Biden administration, and that, by his appointments, Biden wanted it that way.” I have a hard time believing that no one at Fox News is aware of this, and if they are, then why is it never mentioned? Controlled opposition?

I am not going to go into detail here, but I would urge everyone reading this to check out Lew Rockwell’s article on http://www.lewrockwell.com for May 1st and see what he has to say regarding the reasons for Tucker Carlson’s dismissal from Fox News. Tucker skewered some very sacred cows recently, among them the Anti-Defamation League and Black Rock. Lew had lots of commentary on some of this. It’s a long article, but most definitely worth taking time to read–especially when you find out who some of the sacred cows are and the connections between some of them.

The Tucson Ring–Cheating The Apaches For Fun And Profit (Mostly Profit)

by Al Benson Jr.

The other night I watched the 1993 movie Geronimo: An American Legend. Ive seen it a couple times before and always enjoyed it. The rugged Southwestern scenery in it is something I enjoy seeing, a remembrance of my time in that part of the country, but also a reminder that I will never get to go back there. For a movie it was amazingly accurate as far as it went.

Although the movie did not deal with it, the background for much of the Apache trouble in Arizona was the infamous Tucson Ring. Odie B. Faulk, in his book The Geronimo Campaign dealt with the infamous Tucson Ring, as well as the machinations of some of the crooked Indian agents, which displayed many of the problems with the reservation system–one of America’s early problems with socialism.

Faulk noted, in part, “Then in the early 1880s, as the Chiricahuas were forced back on this reservation (San Carlos), functionaries in the Indian Bureau decreed that these proud warriors become farmers, despite the recommendations of such knowledgeable officers as Crawford, Davis and Gatewood that they be encouraged in pastoral pursuits…” That didn’t work. And anyone knowing anything about the Apaches could have told them it wouldn’t work, but trying to tell a government bureaucrat anything about what they mismanage is an exercise in utter futility.

Faulk observed that: “But it was black humor, for thereby the proud Apaches were reduced to living on rations provided for them through the Indian Office through the resident agent at each reservation–a system inviting graft, one allowing the Tucson Ring to get rich through connivance. One of (General) Crook’s aides, Captain John G. Bourke, later wrote, ‘The Tucson Ring was determined that no Apache should be put to the embarrassment of working for his own living; once let the Apaches become self-supporting, and what would become of ‘the boys?’ The Indians were aware of this system, too, knowing that rations intended for their consumption were being openly sold in neighboring towns, that they were being shorted on their allotments. The principal items of issue to them were flour and beef, but their week’s ration of flour would barely suffice for a day. The cattle sent them were held without water by the contractor until they crossed the river just before being weighed; The Government was paying a pretty stiff price for half a barrel of Gila River water delivered with each beef,’ wrote Britton Davis of this practice. In addition, the scales used were incorrect in favor of the contractors, And ‘there was not enough fat on the animals to fry a jackrabbit, many of them being mere skin and bones’ Davis asserted. He once accused the herders of actually carrying some of the cattle to the Agency on horseback, but the herders swore that all had walked.”

Faulk also noted: “The Tucson Ring likewise profited when the Apaches left the reservation. Lucrative contracts could be had for supplying grain, hay, and provisions for soldiers sent to quell uprisings. Sometimes they even wanted to benefit both from the Indians on the reservation and from more soldiers, the ‘boys’ would generate an Indian scare through their newspapers, then bombard Washington with requests for ‘protection.’ As Captain Bourke phrased it, ‘They had only to report by telegraph that the Apaches were ‘uneasy. refused to obey the orders of the agent, and a lot more stuff ofthe same kind and the Great Father would send in ten regiments to carry out the schemes of the ring, but he would never send one honest, truthful man to inquire whether the Apaches had a story or not.”

The “Great Father” in Washington had learned from what he had done to white Southerners during what was euphemistically labeled as “reconstruction” after the War of Northern Aggression that if he could get away with what he did during “reconstruction” then he could surely get away with what he did to the Indians afterward and who would dare question his great wisdom? What Washington did during “reconstruction” and to the Indians later on was an early example of a government declaring war on its own people–something this government has continued to do up to and including our own day!

Too Much Truth For The Establishment (The Deep State)

by Al Benson Jr.

I used to watch Tucker Carlson on Fox News every night before his bosses got too politically correct and decided Tucker was taking his audience of about 4 million a night to places they did not want exposed. Despite all the hype about his toxic work environment and anti-semitism (two of the last refuges of scoundrels) the fact remains that Tucker was giving his growing audience doses of truth they weren’t getting anyplace else–so much so that he had to go.

There were times I didn’t always agree with Tucker. A couple years or so ago he did a segment on the Confederate flag I thoroughly disagreed with. So much so that I did an article on this blog about it called Tucker Carlson And Some Bad History. Tucker had apparently bought into some of the blatant anti-Confederate “history” about the flag and I pointed that out.

But, for all that, I probably agreed with what Tucker said about 90% of the time. He went where many others were afraid to tread, hence he gave us info in some areas the Establishment–both democrat and republican–would rather we did not have access to. What has happened to Tucker shows us in living color that there really is a Deep State and it is very concerned that we not be given the truth about what it is doing to us and our children.

I read an article on LewRockwell.com just this morning that said if Chuck Schumer told Rupert Murdoch to fire Tucker he’d do it because they basically both belong to the same class, go to the same clubs, etc.

So it will be interesting from here on out to watch Fox News to see if they begin to move, ever so slowly, so their audience doesn’t realize it for some time, in the same leftist direction that CNN, MSNBC, NPR, and others have gone in. When that happens you will know that Fox News has been coopted and has joined the usual coterie of left-leaning members of the “news” (and I use that term loosely) media.

Most of what passes for news anymore is little more than leftist propaganda, like much of what you get in our government (public) schools anymore. It is getting harder and harder to get much truth at any age level anymore. The kids are getting propagandized in school so they will be conditioned to accept the leftist lies the “news” media will peddle to them when they grow up.

Tucker told us lots of truth about the Covid vaccine fraud, the supposed Jan 6, 2021 “insurrection” that really wasn’t and the people who were involved in that psy-op project. It will remain to be seen if he can land somewhere where he will be able to reach a sizable audience–not as big as he had on Fox, but still sizable. What happened to Tucker puts on full display the Establishment’s regard for truth, or its total lack in that area. The last thing the Deep State and its willing puppets wants is for the American public to wake up and grasp what is being done to them in the name of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Should that happen, there really might be an insurrection–or better yet–a secession!

For those interested in the article I did on Tucker Carlson and the Confederacy please check out that article on this blog for 6/14/2020. Tucker Carlson and some Bad History. This is one of the few times I disagreed with Tucker, altho I understand he did one on capital punishment I also would not probably have agreed with. He was opposed to it. I’m not.

f

Beware Of Wolves (One Worlders) Dressed In Sheep’s (Republicans) Clothing

by Al Benson Jr.

According to http://www.nationalfile.com for September 20, 2022 “Glenn Youngkin attended Klaus Schwab’s annual World Economic Forum (WEF) summits in Davos, Switzerland in 2019 and 2020, the years immediately preceding his run for governor of Virginia.” I must admit, this was something I had been unaware of until I read the National File article. But, as I have noted previously, the Deep State has its swamp creatures firmly embedded in both political parties.

The National File article continued: “According to a Chinese language webpage, at the 2019 Davos meeting, Youngkin, then a CEO of the Carlyle Investment Group, sat on a WEF panel along side high-ranking CCP member Fang Xinghai…In 2020 Youngkin joined the WEF again at Davos where he touted the Carlyle Group’s adoption of woke capitol ESG ideology under his watch. Short for ‘environmental, social, and corporate governance’ ESG has been described as a massive ‘left-wing power grab’…At that same 2020 gathering, Youngkin said on stage that he hopes to see ‘a real thawing of relationships’ between the U.S. and Communist China so that the financial sector can maximize its profits’.”

The article also observed: “According to top WEF advisor Yuval Harari, under WEF plans, humans worldwide will wear ‘biometric sensors’ so that their every move can be ‘constantly monitored’ by the Chinese government and big tech corporations like Google and Facebook…”

The article also noted that “In the early stages of Virginia’s 2021 GOP nominating process many in the party’s grassroots brought up concerns about Youngkin and his ties to globalism. In addition to the WEF, Youngkin has been a member of the neo-con Council on Foreign Relations and has donated to the far left Southern Poverty Law Center.”

So it would indeed seem that “conservative Republican Glenn Youngkin” is indeed what the Bible describes as a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” posing as something he is not, nor ever has been, because so doing enables him to get elected to positions where he can promote socialist globalism. Apparently, those grassroots activists in the GOP who raised questions about Youngkin’s conservative bona fides had to be silenced so Youngkin could continue to move up the ladder. Who do you suppose silenced them? It sure wasn’t the Democrats! That means there were those in the Republican Party that wanted Youngkin’s critics silenced so he could pose as something he never was–a real conservative! The people of Virginia who were conned into voting for him for governor were sold a bill of goods. It was yet another case of the voters having no real choice between two leftist candidates. How often does this occur and the voters don’t realize it? More than we like to think about!!!

Weaponized “Justice” System Attacked Parents On Behalf Of Public Schools

by Al Benson Jr.

There was an informative article in the New American Magazine for April 24th which shows where public education is really coming from. The article noted: “According to the interim report released on March 21 by the House Committee on the Judiciary and its Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, there is more than enough evidence to prove that the National School Boards Association (NSBA) working in coordination with the Biden administration, created out of whole cloth the pressing need for federal investigation of parents. Twenty-five of those parents were investigated, but not a single charge was brought, indicating that the entire outrage was ‘manufactured’ with no ‘legitimate basis,’ according to the committee…”

In other words, the entire scenario was an exercise in shutting down parental dissent in regard to what was going on in pubic schools. The article continued: “Viola Garcia and Chip Slaven, president and CEO of NSBA, respectively, signed a letter to the White House stating, ‘America’s public schools and its education leaders are under an immediate threat. The National School Boards Association…respectfully asks for federal law enforcement and other assistance to deal with the growing number of threats of violence and acts of intimidation occurring across the nation…NSBA believes immediate assistance is required.”

It only took Biden’s puppet Attorney General five days to issue orders that directed the FBI and U.S. Attorney’s Offices to meet in the next 30 days to talk about plans for dealing with this horrific trend–the trend of weaponizing those agencies under his royal command to begin harassing citizens whose only crime was expressing their First Amendment rights. You see, if you dare to attack what goes on in public schools you are automatically a domestic terrorist and need to be silenced.

The public school establishment would like to add another commandment to the original ten that the Lord gave on Mt. Sinai. And their new commandment is: “Thou shalt not, in anywise, complain about anything implemented by the public school system in regard to what it does to your children.” To do such is an act of terrorism against the public school establishment and will not be tolerated! Your children, after all, are the property of the state to “educate” in a manner the state deems appropriate! That about sums up where the public schools are really at.

This may sound extreme to some who have done no homework about the history of public education in America and who think public schools, overall, are pretty good. But if public schools today are so good, why are they so terrified of parental complaints? It’s because they realize that what they are doing to our kids is not something most parents would go along with and they want to stifle parental dissent before it grows to the point where they can no longer ignore it.

Interestingly, puppet Attorney General Garland has been asked to remove his weaponization letter regarding parents as domestic terrorists. He refuses to do so! So, if you are a parent who complains about the public schools radicalizing your kids you will remain a domestic terrorist! It’s time to quit complaining about what the public schools are doing to your kids and start getting your kids out of public schools! There are more than enough educational alternatives out there now that parents do not need to leave their kids in public indoctrination centers they still mistakenly refer to as schools!