Weather Modification–the ultimate false flag event

by Al Benson Jr.

I have a friend who has a new blog spot and his most recent article dealt with weather modification and a United Nations treaty regarding weather modification. It is worth taking a look at. His blog spot is

Many will say that the Lord controls the weather and I surely don’t argue with that. However that does not prevent puny, sinful man from sticking his nose in there and trying to play God. And if man were not trying to do something in this area then why does the UN have a weather modification treaty?

Please check out


Is The Bias Always All White?

By Al Benson Jr.

On October 29, 2012 I read an Associated Press article by Sonya Ross. It the paper I read it in it was entitled Study: Bigotry Alive and well. It dealt with what the author labeled as bigotry from only the perspective of white bigotry. Ross stated that: “Racial attitudes have not improved in the four years since the United States elected its first black president, an Associated Press poll finds, as a slight majority of Americans now express prejudice toward blacks whether they recognize those feelings or not.”

She went on to say that “Those views could cost President Barack Obama votes as he tries for re-election, the survey found…Racial prejudice has increased slightly since 2008 …In all, 51% of Americans now express explicit anti-black attitudes, compared with 48% in a similar 2008 survey.” There is more, but it is mostly along this line. You can translate this as follows: “you are a racist if you don’t vote for Obama.” Shorn of all the sophistry that is basically what she is saying. Racial prejudice could cost Obama the election.

She also takes another whack at white folks, noting that 52% of “non-Hispanic whites expressed anti-Hispanic attitudes.” And the translation of that little gem is “you are a racist if you don’t like illegal immigrants.” This lady is expressing the old Marxist class struggle message whether she realizes it or not. But after all, this lady is part of the “news” media so we should, by now, expect little else from the “useful idiots” of the press.

The survey or poll she took this from may even be accurate as far as it went, but let’s think for a minute about what the poll did not cover (probably purposely).

What is the percentage of anti-white prejudice by blacks? How many blacks will vote for Obama strictly because of his skin color without having the least clue of where he stands on issues that will affect them and their children? How many will bother to take the time and effort to check out his views and where they come from before voting? Or will his skin color be enough to garner him their votes without any further qualifications needed or wanted?

Now that would be an interesting poll if we had accurate numbers. You might find that lots of blacks vote for a black man because they are prejudiced against whites. Does that make them racists? I can see the college professors now, tearing out their hair at even the thought of such a question. “Oh no” they will chant, “Only whites can be racists, No one else has that power or ability.” To which I would reply—well, maybe it’s better if I bite my tongue and don’t say it.

The thing that really bothered me about this poll was that they only took into account the bias of white folks and no one else, as if only white folks have prejudice regarding race. Anyone with a brain knows that’s not remotely close to the truth.

I remember when we lived in West Virginia, how my kids came home one afternoon and told my wife and I that the black kids they had been playing with told them they were not human because they were not black. Where do you suppose those black kids picked up that sentiment—possibly at home? And if you really want racist rhetoric you should read some of the things said by Mr. Obama’s friends in the New Black Panther Party—oh, sorry I keep forgetting—whatever such groups say no matter how racist it sounds, it’s not really racist because they aren’t white.

If I didn’t know better, I’d say this kind of thing demonstrated a gigantic double standard by such people—do as I say, not as I do, the pot calling the kettle black and all that, but that is not really the case.

These people are practitioners of Marxist truth, which I dealt with in an earlier article. Remember, to the Marxist, whatever furthers his agenda is “truth” and everything else, even if based on fact, is a lie. Dealing with white prejudice and not bothering to deal with black prejudice constitutes Marxist truth.

You can learn how to play this little game once you understand the rules. Whites are all racists; blacks can never be racist—unless, for some reason the Party line changes—then all bets are off.

If you want a little different viewpoint than that given in the managed media do a
Google search on “black bias against whites.”

The Death of the Founding Culture

By Al Benson Jr.

That’s what multiculturalism is all about—the death of the founding cultures in Europe, Canada, and the United States—the death of the Christian culture in all of these places. Or as the leftist radicals in the 60s shouted “hey, hey, ho, ho, western civ (Christianity) has got to go.”

The fact that multiculturalism’s promoters are trying to stamp out western, Christian civilization and replace it with a third world mentality is becoming more and more apparent to people in Europe, Canada, and this country. There is much information about this out there. Unfortunately it is relegated to blog spots and obscure web sites because the prostitute press’ agenda is to tell you how wonderful multiculturalism is and tell you that you are a horrible racist if you even think of opposing it.

So if you want to get a more accurate picture of multiculturalism  you have to do some digging and not just accept what the talking head on your nightly “news” broadcast says. Because, folks, believe it or not, he will lie to you.

Recently I came across an interesting blog spot,  that carried an excellent article about multiculturalism published back in May of 2007. I will quote a few portions of this article: “You hear it all the time here in igno(tole)rant Canada: ‘Our strength is diversity’; or: ‘Our nation was built on immigration’;…Not a day goes by without our senses (not to mention our intelligence) being assaulted by all these fraudulent declarations. We are constantly told how wonderful mass immigration and rampant multiculturalism is. There is no proof of this, mind you—no quantifiable comparative evidence. And yet we are required to believe it.”

This author is citing the exact same situation we have in the US. Our media fill us full of the same nonsensical drivel and we are expected to embrace it and we become social pariahs if we refuse to swallow the bilge. All I can say is that the people who swallow this stuff may one day choke on it.

The writer of this article observes that, had Canada been more careful about who she let into the country she might have had less problems and he says: “…maybe our welfare housing and jails would not be crammed with fatherless West Indian youths; maybe there would be no Canadian-Islamists plotting to destroy our society from within; maybe Canadian-Tamil gangs wouldn’t be terrorizing schools in Toronto;…and maybe Canadians who were born here and paid taxes all their lives wouldn’t be waiting in line for health care behind some recent immigrant’s frail elderly mother who we let come here two weeks ago at age 69.” He could be talking about Newark or Detroit or Rochester, Minnesota just as easily as Toronto. He notes that, when it comes to the MSM (main stream media) all Canadians ever hear is the “good stuff.” Seems Canada has its prostitute press just like we do.

And he observes, quite accurately, I think, that “Only North America and Europe are accepting immigrants in such numbers so as to eventually, and on purpose, shift the balance of power away from the founding culture.” In other words, anything remotely white and/or Christian is purposely being done away with to be replaced by—what? Do you really want to know?

He notes that the ethnic immigrants of yesteryear are in no way like this new breed of freebie seekers. Years ago when immigrants, legal and otherwise, came here it was for a better life. They were willing to start at the bottom, work hard, and become part of American society and if they did this often their grandchildren ended up being able to go to college.

It was the same situation on our Southern border with Mexico. For years illegal immigrants crossed over into Texas or the other southwestern states because conditions in Mexico were so miserable that the country could not support its people. Its socialist rulers were too busy enriching themselves to care about trying to help people take care of themselves. And so the illegals came. But the ones that came back then were willing to blend in and work hard where they ended up and they made a place for themselves and their children. The illegals that come across the border today come with loud demands that they be taken care of, given lots of free stuff, and they even demand that we hand our southwestern states back to Mexico so they can turn them all into little Mexico’s. I’ve been to Mexico twice over the years. No way do I want to see Texas turned into what they have down there. Yet that seems to be what our “leadership” desires.

This is exactly what our national leadership in the Council on Foreign Relations-dominated Democratic and Republican parties desires for us. Get rid of white, Christian culture and replace it with the third world mentality of Mexico or Somalia, who immigrants turn up on our shores and start demanding all the free stuff we are noted the world over for handing out—to everyone except our own needy people. The US is called “Uncle Sucker” around the world and we seem to love to have it so.

As far as Christians go, are they willing to stand up and defend the truths of their faith? Well, they might consider doing some of that—as long as it doesn’t offend anyone. If it offends anyone then we are supposed to all shut up and show our “love” for the infidels by not contradicting their falsehoods. You would be surprised how many Christian folks actually buy into this mindset. Rather then speaking the truth in love they just shut up. After all we wouldn’t want to offend those people who want to replace our legal system with Shariah Law now, would we? How unloving! It seems that parts of the church today have embraced the situation that if you don’t stand for something you will fall for anything.

So we have major problems, just like the Canadians and the Europeans. We had better start finding out how to deal with some of this because there will be no help at the national level or from the media. Their advice to us will be that this is all great so why not go with the flow.

We need much less third world immigration and we need to stop handing goodies out to these people that we wouldn’t even dream of handing out to our own people. As far as illegal immigrants go, I don’t mind helping to pay for one way tickets back to where they came from. This breed of illegals we have today would be much better off haranguing the masses in their country of origin than they are agitating here. The fact that our leaders want them here, eventually to replace us, says something about our “leadership” that we need to address.

Another Fake “Hate Crime”

By Al Benson Jr.

How often has this kind of thing gone on? More often than usually gets reported. If this kind of situation occurs the media usually dumps the details back on page 46 under the obituaries, after they initially had a big front page spread about the “hate crime.”

Anyway, this new, current “hate crime” supposedly took place in Winnsboro, Louisiana on Sunday evening October 21st in Civitan Park in Winnsboro.

The “victim” was Sharmeka Moffitt, who said she was attacked by three attackers wearing white T shirt hoodies. They are supposed to have written KKK on her car with what looked like tooth paste. Moffitt was burned severely in this assault.

Moffitt claimed she could not identify the races of the men in this attack, but if they took the trouble to write KKK on her auto, then you have three guesses as to what color they were supposed to be. The innuendo is that they were “white racists” because, after all, what other kinds of racists are there? Right?

The event was enough to draw in Bishop Justin L. Connor, a district vice-president for the NAACP who said “We are here because we don’t want this to fall on deaf ears.” Translation: We’re going to get a lot of mileage out of this in our promotion of the “white racism” bugaboo. Christian groups gathered in Winnsboro to pray about this, but all the people that got together to pray for the girl’s health and healing, though no doubt sincere, we being played for suckers.

The headline in Wednesday morning’s Monroe News-Star for October 24th was “Investigators: Winnsboro woman’s burns self-inflicted.” The article stated: “Evidence has revealed that Sharmika Moffitt, the 20-year old Winnsboro resident who reported being attacked and burned Sunday night at a local park by three men who wrote KKK on the hood of her car, fabricated the story, police said. During a Tuesday afternoon news conference at the Franklin Parish Courthouse, Franklin Parish Sheriff Kevin Cobb said all forensic evidence pointed toward Moffitt concocting the story and setting herself on fire.”

The Winnsboro Police Chief noted that investigators found Moffitt’s fingerprints on the cigarette lighter and lighter fluid bottle. And “He said DNA evidence also indicated that Moffitt was the one who wrote on her car.” I would think that this situation has to be a shock to this girl’s family.

But think of the publicity that could have been garnered by a “hate crime” in Louisiana just before the election. We would have been inundated with gory tales of “white racism” here as one good reason to re-elect Barack Obama because he would, not doubt, after he is reinstalled in the White House, sponsor even more “hate crimes” legislation that would impact all the Southern states and few of the Northern ones. It’s no secret that Obama has no use for the South. He didn’t get that many votes here except from guilty white liberals who don’t know any better and most black folks who, unfortunately, don’t know any better either. And, after four years of Obama’s Marxism making them even poorer than they were before, they still don’t know any better.

All that aside, though, the fake “hate crimes” stuff gets a bit old after awhile. I have read a good many accounts over the years of people who tried to fake “hate crimes” to make themselves appear to be victims of “white racism.” This seems to go on at a goodly pace.

I recall reading one account years ago of a Jewish woman who called police because someone sprayed “anti-Semitic” epithets all over the door to her apartment. The police came, investigated, but didn’t come up with much. A few weeks later she was back complaining to them about the same thing. This time they installed a camera in her hallway to try to get on film the identity of whoever was doing this to her. Guess what? The camera recorded her out in the hall spraying all this “anti-Semitic” stuff on her own apartment door!

This kind of thing goes on much more than the media lets on. Some incidents like these do get reported, but not all by any means. So what is the agenda of those who perpetrate these things and then seek to blame it on “white racism?”

Let’s face the facts—white Christian Southerners and their culture are under attack today as never before—even those white Christian Southerners that don’t have a clue what’s going on. Their public schools have educated them into almost total ignorance, so while their culture is being savaged, they sit on the couch and watch the latest “reality show.” Someday their Southern culture will be gone and the “reality” will set in—only then it will be too late.

One thing I have learned over the years is that racial prejudice comes in all colors, not just white. I will call it racial prejudice rather than “racism” because that is the Trotskyite term the politically correct would have us use.

Do They Already Have The Election Results?

by Al Benson Jr.

Just this morning someone sent me an article which appeared on which stated: “The 2012 presidential election is still more than two weeks away, but on Friday a CBS News affiliate in Arizona called the race for President Barack Obama. For 17 seconds, Phoenix, Arizona CBS News affiliate KPHO ran a lower third graphic that showed that Obama had won the Nov. 6 election over Gov. Mitt Romney with 99% of the precincts reporting. ..The CBS News graphic showed Obama winning the election with 43% of the vote nationwide to Romney’s 40 percent–or 40,237,966 votes to 38,116,216. It is unclear who garnered the other 17 percent in the fictional election results.” The Daily Caller contacted the station manager but got no response. This was, indeed, a fictional election result, but was it a sneak preview of what we are going to be fed on election night?

Supposedly this was the result of a mistake made with a “test graphic.”

The Daily Caller noted “On Friday October 19th during a test of KPHO-CBS 5’s election returns software we inadvertently  aired a test graphic for about 15 seconds in an episode of Peoples Court…The mistake was caught quickly and taken off the screen. With the election about 2 weeks away, the TV station routinely tests its equipment to ensure our viewers have the very latest results on election night.” Okay.

The question I have is, was this a genuine mistake or was it a mistake to show already predetermined election results that should not have been shown to the public? I found it interesting to observe that the station’s “test results” showed an Obama victory, but with CBS, which some have called “The Communist Broadcasting System” I guess I should not be surprised.

It might be interesting on election night to check the final tallies to see how close they come to CBS’s “mistake” of October 19th.

Mind you it’s not that I don’t trust the government or the media–it’s just that I don’t trust the government or the media.

“Islamic Hand Signs” in Public Schools

By Al Benson Jr.

Those who have followed my articles over the years know where I stand on public schools—they should all have been shut down the day before yesterday. They do not educate—they indoctrinate, and there is a world of difference between the two. It’s interesting that public school “educators” accuse Christian schools of indoctrinating children when that is exactly what the public schools do. I guess it all depends on whose indoctrination is being pushed.

I have advocated, literally for decades, that parents need to take their kids out of public schools and either find good Christian schools for them or teach them at home with curriculum of their choosing not of the state’s choosing.

In recent years I have recommended two books people should read if they wish to know what goes on in public schools. They are Legally Stupid–Why Johnny Doesn’t Have To Read  by Randy Murray and Protester Voices–The 1974 Textbook Tea Party  by Karl Priest. Both of these books let you know what has gone on and is going on in public schools today. Both authors are ex-public school teachers so they are well aware of the game. Both of these should be available on

Just this past week someone sent me an article from  which dealt with the ongoing situation in public schools. The article was dated October 18th . It seems an elementary school teacher in Chesapeake, Virginia has been charged with “simple assault after a parent claimed her daughter’s hand was cut open as a result of a teacher yanking her arm aggressively while trying to teach students an ‘Islamic hand sign.’”

The mother of the 10-year old girl who was allegedly assaulted told TheBlaze  in a phone interview that the teacher, Tara Harris, has a “disturbing trend of ‘indoctrinating’ students with Islamic teachings. She also said the teacher openly campaigns for President Barack Obama in the classroom.” The article noted that: “The teacher was going over Islamic hand signs with the children—she stayed on this issue for two days straight during their reading and math class.” You might be tempted to ask why they are going over Islamic hand signs during a math and reading class. It seems a little off subject but if you understand indoctrination in public schools it really isn’t.

The student involved suffers from a “processing disorder” which makes it difficult for her to quickly grasp things like hand signs. The article stated: “When Bennett’s daughter was unable to do the Islamic hand sign correctly after two days of instruction, Harris became frustrated and attempted to twist the girl’s fingers to make the Islamic gesture meaning ‘power and strength.’ When she didn’t get it right, (Harris) went over and yanked her hand out of her desk and my daughter’s hand got hung up on the metal wire on her file folder and the skin got caught on it…The other children saw my daughter’s hand dripping with blood after the teacher had gotten so mad that she went to twist my daughter’s hand into an Islamic sign. The mother didn’t find out what had happened until the youngster got home. At that point she filed a police report. These Islamic hand signs must be pretty important to this teacher if she is willing to brutalize a youngster who has trouble with them. To her they are so important that they take precedence over the math that is supposed to be taught in a math class.

The Blaze article also said: “The mother said her daughter told her that Harris ‘prays to Allah in Arabic’ around five times a day in front of students and teaches them about Islam and how it is superior to other religions. Bennett claims other parents have confirmed her suspicions after talking with their kids.” Seems one youngster was afraid to go back to school the next day and his mother thinks he was intimidated.

A “school resource officer” told the mother that “speaking in Arabic wasn’t against school policy.” Maybe not, But praying is supposed to be. You can imagine what would happen to any teacher today who got caught leading her class in the Lord’s Prayer. They’d cart her out the back door so fast you wouldn’t see her for the dust! If you don’t think that’s how the game works then get a copy of the DVD IndoctriNation  from Exodus Mandate P O. Box 12072 Columbia, South Carolina 29211 ( and see. I think it costs $20.

What parents in these situations have got to start doing is taking the kids out of the public schools and checking out other educational alternatives. And there are lots of them out there. The public school is not your only option by any means.

Again, it’s worth noting that these Islamic hand signs were so important to this teacher that she spent two days during math and reading classes indoctrinating students with them. We are told such things can never happen in public schools, that no observance to any deity is allowed in them. What they really mean is that no observance of anything Christian is allowed but everything else gets a pass because all the rest of it can be fitted into the propaganda mode somewhere—part of the “multicultural” agenda. But to do that you have to leave the truth about Jesus Christ and how He came to save sinners out. That truth doesn’t fit with the rest of the program so it has to be sacrificed in the name of “diversity.”

That should tell you where these public schools are really at and why your kids don’t belong in them.

Who Originated the Term “Racist” And Why?

By Al Benson Jr.

We have all heard the term “Racist” often more than we care to. It seems as if the politically correct draw the word like a pistol every time they want to verbally mow someone down. Unfortunately it often works and the person who has been labeled a racist or guilty of “white racism” (it’s always white racism, never racism of any other color) slinks off into a corner somewhere and remains silent from then on out, which was the reason for using the term to begin with. It silences dissent.

In an article on  published in 2010 the origin of the word is dealt with. The article observes: “The word ‘racist’ has for a long time been the single most effective fear-word in the leftist and neoconservative arsenal. For decades they have successfully used it in the political arena to slander traditionalists, shut down debate, and leave opponents running for cover…What surprisingly remains almost totally undisclosed, even on the hard core traditionalist Right, is the word’s origin. Did it come from a liberal sociologist? A 60s Marxist college professor? Perhaps a politician in the Democratic Party? No, it turns out that the word was invented by none other than one of the principal architects of the 74-year Soviet nightmare, the founder and first leader of the infamous Red Army, Leon Trotsky.”

The article notes Leon Trotsky’s 1930 work, The History of the Russian Revolution  and it shows a passage from that book. The last word in a particular passage in that book has a Latin transliteration which is “racistov”, i.e., “racists” The article says: “This work here is the first time in history one will ever find that word.”

So, if this article is correct, the originator of the term “racist” is the original Trotskyite.

However, the dubious foundation of the term has not kept college professors and other instructors of our young folks from latching onto the term and co-opting it for propaganda purposes. Trotsky would be overjoyed!

In the summer of 2007 I did an article for  dealing with the University of Delaware when they tried to implement a mandatory program that required all residence hall students to acknowledge that “all whites are racist.” An article on  for November 1, 2007 noted: “Citing that racism is a term that applies ‘to all white people living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, cultural or sexuality’ The school goes on to offer ‘treatment’ for any ‘incorrect attitudes’ the students might have upon entering the school.” So the school planned on offering treatment to white students with “Incorrect attitudes” presumably to help to expunge their sin for being born white. The author of the article said: “Wow! To think I once left a Communist country to get away from such oppressive left wing doctrine only to find it within a state university in the United States of America.” How far is all this away from George Orwell’s “thought police” or “thoughtcrime?”

There must have been quite a fuss over this, because on 11/2/07 the University of Delaware cancelled its “all Whites are Racist” program.

It seems that this concept of all whites being racist has picked up steam in the past few years. The corresponding doctrine to this is that, since all whites are racist because they have the “power” to be, no other race can be considered racist because they have no power.

This is a pile of cow chips that you don’t want to kick on a hot day. Anyone honestly believing this stuff is more than challenged in the brain department. So we now take a word invented by a Trotskyite Communist and demean all white folks the world over for being white. How asinine can you get? Apparently if you work on a college campus there are no limits.

Anyone remember Michael Westerman who was killed in Kentucky by a bunch of black thugs because he had a Confederate flag on the back of his truck? They didn’t like the flag so they shot him. He died, but if you accept the convoluted reasoning of the politically correct crowd it was really his fault because he had the flag on his truck and it “offended” them, so they were thereby justified in taking his life.

Was killing him a “hate crime?” Heaven forbid, no. Now if he had killed one of them it would have been a hate crime of international proportions but because they killed him it’s hardly worth the mention. After all, he was white so he had to be a racist, right?

This is the kind of twisted thinking that goes on at many college campuses around this country. Writer William Lind once wrote an article in which he labeled many colleges in this country as “little ivy-covered North Koreas.” Mr. Lind was right on the money. I’ve seen what goes on at college campuses and it ain’t always pretty—but it is politically correct, and no matter how many lives get ruined the god of political correctness must be served—and sacrificed to.

Seems to me that those that believe and promote this garbage are the biggest racists of all.

Are Whites Being Threatened If Obama Loses The Election?

By Al Benson Jr.

During the 2008 presidential election cycle white folks were told quite plainly that they were racists if they didn’t vote for Obama. Apparently many of them took that to heart and actually believed it was incumbent upon them to vote for Obama to prove they were not racists. (You always knew there was value to a public school education didn’t you?) I wonder how many of these people would be willing to vote for a white man to prove they are not Marxists like Comrade Obama. Probably not enough.

This year, though, it seems that the old “racist” label is not quite enough to enthrall the white folks into voting en masse for Obama and so the black Marxists have tacked the threat of riots if Obama loses onto their list of subtle persuasions.

In an article on  there was recently a sampling of emails from Obama supporters threatening mass mayhem if their golden boy should lose the election. The sheer literary content of some of these should show you where many of Obama’s supporters are really at. One stated: “If Romney wins I’m starting a riot…Whos’ WIT ME???” Another one stated “If Romney gets in the White House…U might was well kill me now…Cause it’s gonna be a *******Riot!!” Still another gentle persuader stated that: “Need 2 come up wit a game plan if Romney win…Riot all thru Newark.” There were several others mentioned in the article, most of the same literary caliber, all threatening general mayhem should Romney win the election. If some of these folks make good their boasts it would give Comrade Obama a wonderful pretext to declare martial law and start the government crackdown on all those terrorist home schoolers, ex-veterans and Christians—you know—all those potential terrorists who cling to their Bibles and guns. He’s like nothing better and his core support just might be in the process of being programmed to do what he wants.

Who in his right mind can’t see the threat here?  Do what we want and re-elect Obama—or else! These people have been programmed into thinking that if Obama loses they will have to give up their “free” Obama cell phones, all the other freebies they’ve been promised, their food stamps and all the rest, all of which they obtain at the expense of us folks who are still willing to work for a living. No wonder the economy is terrible, when those who still work are forced to foot the bill for those who won’t. And these people are threatening to riot if they don’t get more of the same. I wonder if they have ever stopped to consider who will pay for their existence when the middle class is gone. No, I doubt they have the capacity to think that far ahead. They want what they want and they want it NOW!

I wonder if it ever occurs to these people how much like spoiled children they sound—“give me what I want or I’ll throw a temper tantrum!”

Does anyone remember the Rodney King riots in Los Angeles? It was interesting that, during those riots, the one group of people that did not get bothered were the Koreans who protected their businesses by exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. The rioters and looters left them alone because, quite frankly, they did not want to deal with people that would shoot back. They wanted defenseless people to shoot at and beat up on. Those that showed resolve in their own defense were left alone. I suggest there might be a lesson there, should the unlikely occur and Obama winds up losing. I don’t think that will happen, but in the event that the people who control both political parties should, for some reason, do a flip-flop and decide they will get more out of Romney than they will out of Obama, it could.

In the event that such an occurrence does take place and Obama’s supporters decide to take to the streets to vent their racism (because that’s all it really is for most of them) then I think that those among the populace that share a determination to defend themselves and their property by exercising their Second Amendment rights will be pretty much left alone while the rioters go after easier victims.

The only variable in that equation is—should he lose, will Obama then declare martial law and come for everyone’s guns so the rioters won’t have any opposition?

Hate Group On the Left—the Southern Poverty Law Center

By Al Benson Jr.

The Southern Poverty Law Center, located in Montgomery, Alabama, is an organization well known to most of those in the Southern and Confederate Movements—and not viewed with fondness. This is the organization that, over ten years ago, published a list of Confederate “hate groups” that included the United Daughters of the Confederacy and the Sons of Confederate Veterans among others. None of the groups they listed could have been considered hate groups to anyone acquainted with reality. However reality is not something that concerns the SPLC.

Their agenda is to demonize almost anyone to the right of Hugo Chavez, a chore they work at with gleeful abandon. When it comes to Confederate or Southern historical or heritage groups they are all hate groups as far as the SPLC is concerned.

Not only does the SPLC seek to stigmatize Southern Heritage folks, they go after Tea Party people as well and they even stick up for segments of the United Nations agenda.

James Simpson, freelance journalist and former White House budget analyst wrote an article on in which he said: “The SPLC author called Agenda 21 an ‘environmental protection’ initiative, when anyone who has actually studied the document—I have—immediately recognizes it as a rationalization for socializing every aspect of our lives. Not merely redistributing income, which it calls for with a ‘global tax’ but redistributing populations within borders, across borders and even across continents. Sound familiar? Welcome to the open borders crowd and George Soros’ ‘Open Society.’”

Mr. Simpson has realized that the political and theological left often has a problem in promoting indefensible and unpopular agendas that promote socialism and so they are forced to come up with terminology that seeks to make something horrendous sound warm and fuzzy—and this fools lots of people. Thankfully it does not fool all of them and some of those that are not fooled do speak out.

Regarding Agenda 21 Mr. Simpson has further observed: “The U.N.’s primary vehicle for imposing Agenda 21 on local communities is the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI). National awareness of this malevolent organization has now resulted in a percent decline of their membership! About 85 local governments followed the commissioners’ example and revoked their memberships. State governments are now beginning to enact laws against Agenda 21. …We need to recognize that the SPLC does not merely represent an organized example of leftist lunacy. It is a dangerous organization, whose goal is to isolate its enemies and make them politically radioactive. They achieve this through calculated, disingenuous and hate-filled propaganda.”

Simpson has also told us that the SPLC has become a sort of “consultant” not only to the FBI but also to the Department of Homeland Security. What a convenient way to polarize their enemies and make them look evil not only to the federal government but to the public at large. I don’t know how many “news” articles I’ve seen in the past few years that call this or that organization a “hate group” and they cite the SPLC as their source. Years ago those in the Southern Movement stated quite plainly and truthfully that those who use the SPLC as source for their information about “hate groups” are just not credible and should not be taken seriously. I agree.

One piece of revelatory information was passed along by Mr. Simpson in his article when he said: “On May Day this year a bombing attempt by the Occupy Cleveland activists was thwarted. Afterward, a reporter for “National Review” asked the SPLC if it planned to put Occupy Wall Street on its ‘hate group’ list? SPLC’s stunning answer: ‘We’re not really set up to cover the extreme Left.’” In other words, their agenda is to make those on the Right look bad or look like hate-mongers but they don’t really plan to do anything in regard to leftist groups which may be genuine hate groups.

In other words, all their agenda covers is making groups on the right look bad. They have no interest in exposing leftist groups. Why? Because they are over on the far left themselves and they dare not expose any of their “comrades” they have been instructed to leave alone.

Simpson has also noted that: “The SPLC, a ‘non-profit’ organization, has a one quarter billion dollar endowment, and socks away many millions every year in donations and investment returns much of which is kept in offshore banks. Why? The SPLC is an institutionalized, heavily funded genuine hate group that focuses not on other hate groups but on groups it hates…”

As far as Agenda 21 goes, I would expect the SPLC to support and endorse its “initiatives” as the United Nations is a “one world organization” with decided socialist goals. An article published on March 16, 2012 on has observed: “While actual groups do exist that are quite obviously built around hatred or intolerance of other sectors of the population, it is highly doubtful that the government or law enforcement needs the assistance of SPLC to identify them. As SPLC has acquired its massive wealth through selling their own brand of hatred for profit, doubtless they should top the list of possible suspects.”

The next time you see an article about some “right-wing hate group” and the author cites the SPLC as his source, write to the publication he works for and tell them that this group is not a credible sources and encourage the author of the article to get out and do some real homework on his subject instead of buying the tales of leftist prevaricators. And as far as Agenda 21 is concerned, it travels under many names to confuse the uninformed. One code term you can pick up in their literature is “economic sustainability.” Groups using this term should be looked at long and hard before you make any commitments of any kind to them.

Can These Educators Be That Ignorant?

By Al Benson Jr.

Recently I read an article by Paul Kengor on that dealt with a band at a high school in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, the town where, during the War of Northern Aggression, the Union armies supposedly “preserved the Union” and “government of the people, by the people,” and all the rest of the usual claptrap that we have been taught as “history.”

Ironically, in Gettysburg, the high school band, during halftime at some game, presented a “musical commemoration of the Bolshevik Revolution, complete with hammers and sickles, military uniforms, and red flags.” The parents of the students did not find it amusing. The superintendent of the school claimed ignorance and said: “It’s a representation of the time in history called ‘St. Petersburg 1917.’” She apologized because people viewed the performance in the manner they did. She seemed not to grasp the significance of what had been done.

Mr. Kengor, in his article, noted that: “To be fair to the superintendent, she sincerely doesn’t seem to understand what’s so bad about this incident and why it’s in bad taste. In fact, therein is the basic problem: We have failed to teach the horrors of the Bolshevik Revolution specifically and of communism generally.” Given the nature and foundations of our public school system, which I have dealt with in a number of previous articles, I am not sure that failure was not intentional. This school superintendent was probably taught by people who had no desire to expose the horrors of communism at any level and so she cannot pass along to her students what she never learned herself. This is a glaring example of why it is so critically important that our young folks know and understand real history and not the sugar-coated drivel they are being fed today.

Interestingly, Mr. Kengor related a story about a friend of his who told him about his first teaching assignment in a high school history class. Somewhere this young man had learned accurate history and so he covered material dealing with the famine in the Ukraine, the Stalin purges and the pact between Hitler and Stalin. He said the students “were electrified, hands in the air, many questions—clearly learning these things for the first time. Yet he also noticed dirty looks from his supervisor.” He said that, later, she told him to ease up on the “Red-baiting and commie-bashing” and she told him in no uncertain terms that “…these students are going to get a decidedly different view on communism from me.” I don’t doubt that for a minute. The public school is generally not noted for giving kids the truth about communism—again, remembering that Karl Marx advocated “Free education for all children in public schools.”

Mr. Kengor told of another student who attended a private Christian school, where a newly hired teacher, fresh out of a major university, told the students “…he was a ‘Christian communist, ‘ and that anyone who is a Christian should be a communist.” You have to wonder how carefully this school checked out its teaching candidates. Not carefully enough in this case. It’s bad enough that the kids get this brainwashing in public schools. Those who truly understand the public schools expect that. What they don’t expect, and what they are going to have to start learning is that the danger may be just as real in a Christian school if parents are not alert and discerning.

In his article Mr. Kengor mentioned The Black Book of Communism, printed several years ago by Harvard University Press. I have a copy of this and fun reading it ain’t, but it’s necessary for those who need to understand what the communists do in any country they take over or are seeking to take over. And don’t fall for the old line that “communism is dead.” It’s as much alive now as it was in the Cold War—only they call it by different names now—multiculturalism, the “green movement”, Agenda 21 and a whole bunch of fancy titles that people need to become aware of. Besides, if you think communism is dead all you have to do is look at Washington. You have a Marxist in the White House who will probably be back for a second term because his opposition isn’t really opposition and there are untold numbers of people out there with no understanding, thanks to their public school “educations,” who know nothing about Marxism and are enthralled because “Obama gave us free phones.” So you got a free phone, which someone somewhere had to pay for, and for that you were willing to trade your liberty. Pardon me if I think it’s a lousy trade-off. The Bible narrative about Esau trading his birthright for a mess of pottage comes to mind.

So don’t expect the truth about communism from your public school. Oh, here and there you will find a teacher that has the guts to tell the kids the truth, but they are few and far between and if you ever do come across one, listen to him while he is still there, because he may not be for long.

By the same token, check out the teachers in your Christian schools and find out where they stand on the issue of communism. If they can’t, or won’t take a stand against it then they shouldn’t be there. Regardless of what some may try to tell you, communism is not Christian and should be exposed wherever it rears it ugly head.