The Great Unanswered Question

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Here and there I get remarks directed at some of the historical articles I write concerning the War of Northern Aggression. Most of the comments seem to deal with the slavery issue. Some individuals with great imagination almost seem to think that the South fought that war so we could still keep slaves to this very day.

To these political worthies I have often directed this question–If the North was so gung ho as to fight against the South to free the slaves, then why did not the North first free all the slaves in states that, for one reason or another, remained part of the Union? This would included Kentucky, Maryland, Delaware, Missouri, and the newly created state of West Virginia. That’s right–West Virginia. The newly created state of West Virginia entered the Union as a slave state, not as a free state. The response I have gotten to this question has been one of ear-shattering silence! No one wants to touch this question and so they just pretend it doesn’t exist or that they didn’t hear anyone ask it. It’s probably the most ignored question of the past several decades.

To these harbingers of Yankee righteousness I would direct the book by Gene Kizer Jr. which I reviewed a few years back Slavery Was Not the Cause of the War Between the States published by Charleston Athenaeum Press http://www.BonnieBluePublishing.com Check the internet and see if you can find it if you want the truth instead of Yankee fables. If you don’t really want the truth (and I suspect many don’t) then continue to ignore it, but if you do that, then please shut up about all this slavery foolishness!

Mr. Kizer noted on page xxiii of the introduction to his book that “Most people in the North (95-98% according to historians Lee Benson and Gavin Wright) were not abolitionists. They did not care about freeing the slaves who would then come North and be job competition. No Republican could be elected in the North on the platform of directly ending slavery but they could agitate on slavery in the West with good results. It was a hot political issue driven as much by rallying votes–vote Republican:…Lincoln himself stated in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates that the West was to be reserved for white people from all over the earth…Neither slaves nor free blacks were welcome in Lincoln’s West.”

Kizer observed a comment by Lincoln scholar Richard N. Current where Current stated: “Lincoln and his fellow Republicans, in insisting that Congress must prohibit slavery in the West, were dealing with political phantoms.” Kizer tells us that “In 1860, there were only two slaves in Kansas and 15 in Nebraska, and that was after being open to slavery for ten years. As stated above, Current did not believe slavery would have lasted another generation, even in the deep South.”

And Kizer reiterates “Slavery was not the cause of the War Between the States. Once you understand the true cause–the imminent economic annihilation of the North which was coming fast–all other actions taken by Lincoln and everybody else make infinitely more sense. Abraham Lincoln needed to start his was as quickly as he could. He needed his blockade of the South in place as fast as possible to keep Europeans and especially the English from forming trade and military alliances with the South…” Kizer also noted that: “Ramsdell states also that the North’s gaping self-inflicted wound, the Morrill Tariff, kicked in and greatly added to the panic and call for war in the North as the Northern shipping industry was largely rerouted, in one fell swoop, away from the high-tariff North and into the low-tariff South where protective tariffs were unconstitutional.”

Now I realize that Mr. Kizer’s research will never convince the professional South haters of their gross errors on the slavery issue, but at least they can never say no one told them.

Reconstruction Is Back–If it really ever ended to begin with

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Back in 1868 the Russian radical, Michael Bakunin, commented on the aftermath of the War of Northern Aggression. Considering he was not an American, Bakunin had some interesting comments to make about that war. In the book Russian Radicals Look To America it was noted, on page 70 that “Bakunin hoped for the ‘triumph’ of this minority ‘of great and generous…principles,’ but at the same time was aware of the limited possibilities of the ‘revolution by consent’ (as we would cal it today), once this minority achieved power. For ‘popular self-government’ really to become a reality…another revolution…far more profound…would be necessary.”

What Bakunin was really saying here is that another revolution, over and beyond the War of Northern Aggression, would be needed to give newly freed ex-slaves the place they really deserved in this country–and that further revolution was what Karl Marx referred to as “the reconstruction of a social world”–what we call “reconstruction” in the South. Two things here. One, Bakunin recognized the War of Northern Aggression was a revolution, and it was. It was this country’s French Revolution. Two, he recognized that our version of the French Revolution was not quite enough to give the leftist radicals in Washington everything they hoped for and so, to do that, we needed yet another revolution, a revolution that lying “historians” have told us was to rebuild the vanquished South–and they had the gall to call it “reconstruction.” Former General Richard Taylor from here in Louisiana called it “deconstruction” and he was right!

If you want to find out how well “reconstruction” really worked for the South and its folk, then read Ron and Donnie Kennedy’s book Punished with Poverty Shotwell Publishing, Columbia, South Carolina and you will get an up close and personal view of how “reconstruction” worked for the South.

The late Frank Conner in his book The South Under Siege–1830-2000 noted some of what was “accomplished” during “reconstruction” in the South. Mr. Conner observed that “…voter registration boards (named by the military authorities) could arbitrarily deny the vote to anyone: in other words, Southern Democrats would have a very hard time getting registered to vote…Now the South was under martial law. The occupying army could enter and search any Southerner’s home at any time and seize whatever possessions it wished…The U.S. Army could arrest any Southerner at any time for virtually any reason and hold him as a prisoner without trial for however long it wished…Woe unto any Southerner who displayed–under any circumstances at all–a Confederate flag or any other symbol of the Confederacy, he would be arrested immediately.” Former Confederate soldiers even had to remove CSA buttons off their coats and fasten those coats with string! Does any of this sound remotely familiar given today’s political climate–particularly the part about the flags–and that part has now been expanded to include Confederate monuments–the reason given for that? They supposedly promote “racism.”

Look at some of what has gone on recently in this country. It looks to me like our current crop of leftists in both parties in Washington has been using the playbook of the Radical Republicans from the 1860s as a guide to what they want to enact in our day. One is left to wonder how long it will be before they start trying to enforce the finer points of this updated “reconstruction.” Already Trump voters are all being labeled as “domestic terrorists” who, if not all arrested should at least be forced to attend “re-education camps”. They did the same thing in the 1860s in the South–only back then the re-education camps were called public schools and they were a particularly Yankee invention foisted on the South as part of our price for losing the War. Same principle in both cases.

Back in the 1860s Southerners who would not vote Republican were routinely denied the vote. They’re not doing that today–yet–rather they are going to cancel out our votes by letting anyone who comes into the country vote, citizen or not and they are talking about even giving the vote to 16 year olds. They plan to make sure those nasty Trump voters never have enough votes again to constitute a majority and should that occur again by sheer accident a bit of creative voting in certain states will solve that thorny problem for them.

Actually, “reconstruction” in this country never really ended. It took a slight breather but now it has returned with a vengeance. One wonders if Trump voters are the new Confederates in this ongoing story of leftist occupation of the country. So, folks, welcome to the 21st century brand of “reconstruction” designed by the deep state to ensure that you never get your God-given liberties back–ever again!!!

Supporting “Conservative” Republicans–WHAT Conservative Republicans???

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

How many of you all have ever gotten either letters in the mail or on the internet asking you for money so “conservative” Republicans can do battle against liberal Democrats? They try to make it sound like an ideological war–and it isn’t! What’s the old saying–a fool and his money are soon parted?

The truth of the matter is that liberal (socialist) Democrats and many “conservative” Republicans all work for the same people and have the same goals. But they have to give the illusion to the public that they are somehow at war with one another. They aren’t. The Republican Party today is still the party of Abraham Lincoln the Socialist! Little has changed since the War of Northern Aggression is supposed to have ended. Our Southern states and our history, heritage and culture are still under assault from the deep state denizens of the Washington swamp with political generals in the military constantly referring to the Old South and its leaders as traitors.

Don’t expect any of this to get any better anytime soon. It will get worse. A case in point is the short article by Laurence M. Vance on yesterday’s https://www.lewrockwell.com I will quote Mr. Vance here: “The Senate has confirmed Biden’s pick to lead the Department of Defense, retired Gen. Lloyd Austin. The good black general was confirmed after voicing support for rescinding the Trump administration ban on transgender people serving in the military. The vote was 93-2. If you thought for a minute that Republicans in the Senate would oppose any of Biden’s policies, then think again. And tell me again why it was important for those two Georgia Republicans to win those Senate races.” The two Republicans that voted against this political charade were Mike Lee and Josh Hawley. Five senators did not vote, for whatever reason, though their votes would have made no difference anyway.

So where were all those Republican “conservatives” in the Senate that were supposed to do battle against liberalism? Seems like, when push came to shove they all found it much easier to just cave in and go along with the Democratic socialists. This is what the Republicans always seem to do–rail vociferously against liberalism (socialism) and after they have done a sufficient amount of protesting they just cave in and go along with the Democrat’s socialism. By now we should be able to detect a pattern here.

At the national level and most state levels there is not a dime’s worth of difference between the two parties. And you folks that have been supporting the Republicans because you thought they would fight against liberalism might as well put your wallets back in your pockets because all you are doing is financing your adversaries. The deep state, the Swamp, whatever you want to call it, controls both the Republicans and the Democrats and they are mostly just socialists with a little different timetable for implementing their socialism.

I would hope that if one good thing comes out of the Harris/Biden Regime it will be the fact that the Republican Party may finally be exposed for the political fraud that it really is and that millions of folks might bolt that party and look for a third party alternative.

Donald Trump was supposed to have been involved with a new group, the Patriot Party. Now we hear that he is no longer interested in that and is going to spend the next two years trying to get Republicans elected to the Senate and the House. How much good did the Republicans in the Senate and House do him in this last election. The majority of them stood in line to stab him in the back and gleefully passed the political knife from one to the other. How does he know that in another two years the Republicans he helps to win won’t do the same thing to him that was done in 2020?

With all due respect, Mr. Trump, I think you are wasting your time doing that. Many Republicans really don’t care if they win or not as long as they have a place at the table. They are more than willing to play second fiddle to get that and to share in the political goodies. If they were not willing to stand by you this time why will they be willing to stand by you next time?

And if this election was highly questionable–and it was–then why do you think the same game won’t be played in the next election and all those down the road after this one? If millions of voters left the Republican Party there would be more than enough to start a third party–provided you could get leadership that couldn’t be bought off or co-opted.

Back in the late 1800s, theologian Robert L. Dabney made a prescient statement about conservatives. He noted that they seldom “conserve” much of anything. They protest the liberal agenda long and loud–and then end up giving in to it with a whimper. When the next liberal program comes along they play the same game all over, with the same end results. Don’t we see that happening here today? Same game just different players.

Most Republican “conservatives” (not all but most) are little more than political con artists trying to get you to buy chips in a game you cannot win. The two party charade is really nothing more than a one party oligarchy and it is long past time that we began to figure this out and quit playing the game. No matter who wins–socialist Democrats or socialist Republicans–we lose!

Socialist Republicans Today No Different Today Than They Were In The 1860s

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

I just read a headline last evening that said “McConnell lays out Trump Impeachment Trial Timeline…” Now I may be a bit dense but my understanding of what the Constitution said about impeachment was that you had to try a sitting president (that means one still in office) for “high crimes and misdemeanors” and that once the president became a private citizen he could no longer be impeached. But of course that was back in the day when Congress at least tried to pretend that they followed the Constitution. Now all such foolish restraint has been tossed aside and the socialist Republicans have no problem identifying with the hard left Democrats that they always claim they are opposed to. So we can assume that Mr. Trump will now be subject to routine bouts of impeachment for the rest of his natural life–and beyond.

The real reason for this impeachment is so they can pass an impeachment resolution that stipulates that he can never again run for any political office. Truth be told, they are still scared to death of what Mr. Trump might do a few years down the road and they want to deprive him of any chance to do it–whatever it is.

I suppose if Trump’s son, Don Jr., were to decide to run for president in 2024 Congress, both Republicans and Democrats, would pass a resolution impeaching Don Jr. even before he occupied any office whatever. But they will try yet again to impeach Trump, not because he really broke any law, but because the have the power to do whatever they want and they want to make sure the foes of their deep state bosses never have another chance to assume any office that will damage the deep state in any way. Now that the operatives of the deep state in both parties have the power they plan on never giving it up again. When the Chinese Communist troops get around to occupying the country even they will have to get permission from the deep state to do whatever they want to do because the deep state controls their leaders too. You think that won’t happen? Want to bet your life savings on it?

Andrew Johnson’s impeachment in the late 1860s was made up of the same type of flimsy material that today’s Trump impeachments are–smoke and wind signifying nothing. In his book Impeached author David O. Stewart made some interesting observations. Stewart is an establishment historian, yet even for that, his book contains some interesting comments about Johnson and his impeachment. He noted, on page 75, that “…Congress was daily receiving petitions that demanded Johnson’s removal from office. The petitions, the fruits of an organized campaign, were signed by as few as three citizens or as many as three hundred. They poured in throughout 1867, mostly from the Midwest”

Radical Republican Thaddeus Stevens had been pushing something called the Tenure of Office Act which was to become the centerpiece of the impeachment charges against Johnson. Stewart tells us: “Under the legislation, the Senate would have to concur in the firing of any executive official whose appointment the Senate had confirmed in the first place..The Framers in 1787 required Senate confirmation of presidential appointees, but the charter was silent about who could remove those officials.” The thing they went after Johnson for was his demanding the resignation of Secretary of War Edwin Stanton who Johnson didn’t trust–and with good reason.

Johnson vetoed the Act, which naturally was overridden by the radical Congress and so it became law. It is interesting that this Act was only passed shortly before the impeachment and up until that time there was no law preventing a president from firing someone in his cabinet. You have to wonder if this was passed in order to keep Stanton in office. He was, after all, one of those reputed by researchers to have had connections to the Lincoln assassination. What other possible connections to that event may have been then sitting in Congress? If I recall some of my research on the Lincoln assassination there were some. At any rate Congress was going to make sure Stanton’s “six was covered.”

On page 112 Stewart also observed: “Fired by Stevens, the group resolved not to abandon the cause. They would bring up impeachment again and again and again. As a Republican remembered their strategy, ‘the closest watch would be kept upon every action of the President, and if an apparent justifying cause could be found the project of his removal would be vigorously renewed.”

Does any of this sound familiar to you? How different is this from what the Democrat/Republican political machine is doing in our day? I submit their ain’t much difference. Back then we had socialists that ran the Republican Party. Today it’s socialists that run both the Republican and Democratic parties. But is their really much difference? Only difference is that they are going after a man who is now a private citizen and not a sitting president. But that’s no problem for them. The slight matter of it being against the law bothers them not at all. When you have a president in office that gained that office by questionable means and a vice-president who is not constitutionally eligible to hold her office, what difference does the law make? It’s just an inconvenience to be ignored–unless you or I break it and then, Katy bar the door! Our two–tiered system of justice will not allow for that–they can–we can’t! Simple as that!

The Socialist Republican Party Ain’t Your Friend, Folks

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Many of us have been beguiled over the years into believing the outright lie that the “conservative” Republicans were out there protecting us from the liberal Democrats so we should all vote for them so they can keep on “protecting” us from those raving liberals. To say that such regurgitated hogwash is bovine fertilizer would be to give it credit it does not deserve. That’s how bad it is!

With some exceptions the Republicans are every bit as bad as the Democrats. But they dare not admit that lest it cost them votes in the next election. So they keep parroting the lie of Republican “conservatism.” A friend just sent me some of his comments on recent events and he made a good observation. He said: :”When the Republicans get in office they seldom totally clean out the Democrat appointees and their hires. Big mistake. Many of the really rotten ones were Bush era…The Bush people sabotaged Trump and are really partners with the Democrats.” He is right on target here, except the keeping by Republicans of Democratic holdovers is not a big mistake–it is intentional, because the Republicans and Democrats all work for the same people.

And anyone who tells you the Republicans will fight against socialism for you is whistling Yankee Doodle. Researcher Arthur R. Thompson, in his informative book In the Shadows of the Deep State gives us a little history I’m willing to bet will never show up in your high school history book. I have found some of the same stuff when I did research for Donnie Kennedy’s and my book Lincoln’s Marxists.

Mr. Thompson tells us: “The vast majority of Americans are not aware, for instance, that Karl Marx wrote for the New York Tribune for eleven years prior to and including the first year of the American Civil War. The Tribune at the time was the largest Sunday circulation newspaper in the United States. Marx was not the only European communist that wrote for the Tribune, and many on its editorial staff, as well as its publisher, Horace Greeley, were part of the communist network in America at that time. Horace Greeley was very active in forming an organization that established nearly 50 communist communes across America at the time. Greeley, along with two other prominent political figures, including one in the Senate, joined the First International shortly after it was formed. It was the communist/socialist organization that helped to build the circulation of the Tribune. The Tribune’s staff in turn played a major role in the establishment of the Republican Party in 1854 in the person of Alvan Bovay (after a planning meeting with Greeley about building a new party). Bovay worked for the Tribune for a time. The party was formed primarily out of the commune leadership that existed in Ripon, Wisconsin. This commune, known as Ceresco, was part of the Greeley organization…It was the socialist apparatus that propelled the rapid growth of the Republican Party to the extent that the Whigs faded away and finally politicians such as Lincoln joined the GOP in opposition to the Democrats months and years after it was founded…The Swamp is much older than people realize and one has to look back to see its origins and how it gained control, particularly over history.”

That, folks, gives you a brief introduction to the foundations of the “conservative” Republican Party, which really works hand in glove with the liberal (socialist) Democratic Party. Do you begin to grasp now why nothing ever changes in Washington? And why the Republicans, many of them closet socialists, stabbed Trump in the back? Are you beginning to connect the dots yet?

I hear people now howling about why we really need our two-party system to be strengthened. More hogwash, drivel, whatever you want to call it. We have not had a two party system in this country for over a century now and the supposedly conservative Republican Party was actually founded by socialists, not conservatives.

Anyone looking for “conservative” help from the Republicans may well get stabbed with the same knife they used on Trump! When Donnie Kennedy and I first got our book published the title of the first edition was Red Republicans and Lincoln’s Marxists. Are you beginning to get a slight glimmer as to why we called it that?

The Real Republican Party Is The Party Of Abraham Lincoln The Socialist

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

How quickly we forget our real history, if in fact we were taught any real history. I watched the despicable charade this week as establishment Republicans lined up waiting for their chance to stab Donald Trump in the back. They all got their chance and they wielded the knife with gleeful abandon. Voters should remember that and if by some chance a new political party should emerge from this horrendous betrayal then those that supported Trump should abandon the Republican Party yesterday if not sooner!

Rand Paul said that if the Senate agrees to impeach Trump after he has left office then fully one third of those in the Republican Party would bolt the party and go elsewhere. They should do that even if the Senate does not impeach. The Republican Party is not worth their support. It is run by scalawags like Mitch McConnell, whose wife either owns or has connections to a company in Communist China. So it would seem that, at real levels, McConnell has no problems with communists. To label those Republicans that stabbed Trump in the back as scumbags would, I think, be a step up for them.

We look at the Democratic Party in our day and recognize the taint of radical socialism has taken over that party. However, there was a time when the Democrats were the conservatives and the Republicans were the radical socialists. Today both parties are radically socialist at the leadership levels. The Republicans try to cover it up but they are lying to us.

If you look at the foundations of the Republican Party, going back into the 1850s, you find that those foundations lean heavily toward the far left. The Republicans’ first presidential candidate was John C. Fremont, the “pathfinder” and Fremont was a socialist. Donnie Kennedy and I dealt with him and his socialism in our book Lincoln’s Marxists. The second edition of our book is out of print, but the first edition, back in 2007, is still available.

The Republican Party’s second presidential candidate was Abraham Lincoln and Mr. Lincoln was also a socialist. Way back in 2006 I did an article for the internet called Mr. Lincoln The Socialist. You can still find it on the Dixie Outfitters website but not too many other places thanks to media and big tech censorship policies. Politically incorrect material is now being either removed or, at best, being shadow banned. Quite a bit of my material has suffered this fate.

I noted in the Lincoln socialist article that Mr. Lincoln had warm words for Robert Owen’s socialist experiment in New Harmony, Indiana. Lincoln was a great admirer of Henry Clay and his “American System.” I noted an article by Thomas DiLorenzo, written back in the late 1990s called Henry Clay–National Socialist. Tom DiLorenzo was right on target about Henry Clay’s socialism. So if Clay was a socialist and Lincoln was a follower and admirer of Clay, what does that tell you about Lincoln? The fact that Lincoln went out of his way to recruit socialist and communist generals for his Union Army shows he had no problem with socialists and communists. And please don’t try to tell me Lincoln didn’t know where these guys were coming from. Lincoln was not stupid–he knew!

And today’s Republicans know too. They have no trouble sitting at the same political table with socialists and communists as long as they can get their slice of the political pie. That’s what the Republican Party is really all about. They are the “loyal opposition” to the Democratic Party. In fact their agenda is to take us over the same political cliff as the Democrats. They just want to do it a little slower. That’s the only difference between the two parties. The Republicans are just “slow Democrats.” We would do well to remember that. I do hope Mr. Trump has learned that lesson. Maybe it will stand him in good stead down the road if he remains politically active.

Is Kamala Harris Eligible To Be President?

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

One of the most open “secrets” around is that many in Sodom on the Potomac realize that Joe Biden’s tenure as “president” may not last all that long. His Marxist running mate, who I refer to as “Comrade Kamala” is anxiously waiting in the wings to assume the royal presidency when Joe is told he is no longer necessary and is sent back to his basement bunker in Delaware to smell the daisies.

One thorny problem with all this, though, is that Comrade Kamala is not constitutionally eligible to be either president or vice-president. The New American Magazine for September 21st of 2020 carried an article by Joe Wolverton J.D. in which Mr. Wolverton wrote: “Yet Kamala Harris is constitutionally ineligible to be president of the United States because she is not a natural born citizen, as required by Article II (and by reference, the 12rh Amendment) of the U.S. Constitution. While born in the United States–Oakland, California–at the time of her birth, Kamala Harris’ father was a citizen of Jamaica and her mother was a citizen of India. This makes Kamala Harris a native-born American–thus eligible to serve as a U.S. Senator—but she is not a natural-born citizen, the higher standard set for those occupying the office of president.”

In order for her to have been a natural-born citizen her father would have had to be a U.S. citizen, which he was not at the time of her birth. Another concern shared by many is that her father, according to author Trevor Loudon, was “an avowed Marxist professor in the Economics Department at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California…Both of Harris’ parents were active in the Berkeley based Afro-American Association. Fidel Castro and Che Guevara were the heroes of the Afro-American Association…”

Does all this begin to give you some idea of where Comrade Kamala is really coming from? If it doesn’t then don’t bother reading any of the rest of this as you won’t grasp its implication anyway.

Do I think any of this will make any difference to Harris–the fact of her being constitutionally ineligible to be president? Not in the least! That will all be ignored by both her and our compliant media who have been trained to just look the other way when confronted with an inconvenient truth. The fact of her ineligibility to hold the office will never be brought up and to question her ineligibility may get you labeled as an insurrectionist. Or as a man once said “Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” And that is where we are living right now.

So get ready because this coming Wednesday you will be treated to a faux-inauguration.

If It Sounds Too Good To Be True It Probably Is

by Al Benson Jr.

For weeks now i have been hearing about how Biden will not be inaugurated on January 20th and how Trump will turn the tables on the deep state and have all the traitors arrested that day and will still be president for another four years. I have gotten this narrative from multiple sources.

I have checked out videos from some of these sources. Most of them are put out by people I have never heard of and, quite frankly, a couple of them look like people that would not have sense enough to come in out of the rain. So I am asking myself, where do these people all of a sudden come from and where do they come up with this “secret” information? Do they honestly think the deep state apparatus doesn’t know what they have been saying for weeks now and that only hard-core patriots are getting their stuff? You can bet if the deep state knows about this they would be doing something about it and not just waiting for it to magically happen.

It all sounds so great. Trump gets his second term and those selling out the country all get arrested. I would dearly love to see it happen but I doubt that it will. I am about half convinced that this just might be a deep state operation to keep Trump supporters off balance and eventually demoralized when this doesn’t really happen the way they have been told it will. If, by some chance it is accurate and does happen I will be more than happy to admit I was wrong. In fact this is one time I would dearly love to be wrong. I would love to see those selling the country out get what they so richly deserve and what they have deserved for most of my lifetime–real justice! I just don’t think it is going to happen. How many of us have waited for Hillary to get justice after all that she and her philandering husband have pulled over the years? Has that happened? How many leftist scumbags have worked at tearing down this country for fun and profit over the decades? Have they been caught or punished? Yet we are supposed to believe that Trump will handle all the traitors in one day, in one fell swoop? Stop and think about it folks.

There has even been one guest on the Infowars site that has been saying this and he is one among many from different places that has been parroting this stuff. He has been right about some things in the past but I think he is way off base on this one. As I said, I would love to be wrong but I am not pinning any wild hopes on this scenario only to see them dashed on inauguration day if they swear Biden and his Marxist running mate in.

I have had many friends that have bought into this possible scenario. It’s almost like our last, best hope to avoid what amounts to a Marxist takeover of this country, but I am just afraid it ain’t gonna happen the way we could all wish it would. I am afraid, after spending over half of my life opposing Marxism, that we are going to have to learn how to deal with a Marxist Regime in Washington that may be even more of a problem than Obama was for us.

The deep state that really controls both political parties has allowed us to see how many Republicans really hate Trumps guts and couldn’t wait for a chance to turn on him. Once patriotic Republicans realize their own party has willingly thrown them under the bus it is my hope they will desert the party of Lincoln and Lincoln’s Marxists in droves and possibly look toward the formation of a new party, or even toward the possibilities of nullification and secession. Just trying to elect “more conservatives” to Congress doesn’t seem to be getting it and some of those “conservatives” really aren’t–they just lie to us to get elected and then sell out once they get to Washington. We need a different approach and Red State Red County Secession could well be one viable option.

We will have to see what all happens after next Wednesday. Again, I reiterate, I would love to be in error here, but if I am not, don’t say you were not told. Hope for the best but prepare or the worst.

The Great Capitol “Riot” Was A Planned Farce

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

The truth usually comes out, even though it seems that it is a bit late sometimes. Now we are beginning, with bits and pieces, to find out what the “riot” at the Capitol was really all about. And much of it is what I originally said it was–an effort to do away with any discussion of the fraudulent nature of the November 3rd election.

The website https://www.naturalnews.com for January 9th noted: “The propaganda industry, also known as the media, is falling all over itself with feigned ‘shock and horror’ over the spectacle that was broadcast to the world from the Capitol on Wednesday. It was enough for nearly all of Congress to reject any further discussion about election fraud, which appears to have been the goal all along…Truth be told, the whole thing was a staged psy-op designed to further demoralize the public while creating the pearl-clutching necessary to ignore the stolen election.”

The article continued: “It was the perfect false flag attack to divert attention away from election fraud and onto Trump and his supporters, who have now been painted as ‘domestic terrorists’ and a force to be reckoned with if the United States has any chance of ‘healing.”

Writer Michael Snyder wrote: “It is almost as if someone was extremely determined to get those Antifa activists to their location so that they could do their job…Once they got inside the Capitol, the Antifa activists could have done a much better job of disguising themselves”

The Natural News article also observed that: “Perhaps the most obvious ‘protester’ –who is not what the medial portrayed him as–is the Viking horns guy, who was seen at a BLM rally in Arizona back in June. This character was also photographed at a ‘climate activism’ event back in 2019.” If this is accurate then he can hardly be classed as a diehard Trump supporter–yet this is what the “news media” is trying to peddle to what they hope is a gullible public. You have to wonder why the media can’t seem to connect these dots. Truth is–they don’t want to because that would destroy their anti-Trump narrative and the news media is no more about real news than I am the man in the moon!

In an article on https://trendingpolitics.com it was noted that “In what should be front page news, federal law enforcement officials have told CNN that they believe the January 6th storming of the Capitol was planned ahead of time by bad actors instead of a random riot inspired by President Trump’s speech…The entire impeachment witch hunt and de-platforming of the President is based on the lie that Trump ‘incited an angry mob’. As the investigators are beginning to learn, that was not the case at all. In fact, CNN even admits that law enforcement is leaning towards the fact that everything was planned rather than just a riot that ‘spiraled out of control’.

The article contained commentary by a Carmine Sabia to the effect that “Breaking per CNN–Investigators believe riot at Capitol was planned and not inspired by Pres Donald Trump. But Democrats impeached before they had any information from investigators.” Many in Congress were looking for a reason, any reason at all would do, to impeach Trump with the idea of trying to get him out of office and never able to run for any office after this. Believe it or not, they are afraid of Trump because he is beginning to find out where the bodies are buried and, not being a part of the deep state, he might tell the American people what they need to know rather than what the deep state wants them to believe.

Another Natural News article, this one from January 15th, tells us that “Federal law enforcement officials are blowing the lid on the Capitol false flag ‘siege,’ revealing that it was planned long in advance by bad actors who hate President Donald Trump rather than support him.” This shouldn’t surprise us at all. The question remains–who funded these Antifa types and paid for their coming to Washington in order to make Trump look bad and to try to bury the truth about the massive election fraud? Lots of us would like to know, though I doubt we will ever find out and we better not hold our breath waiting for the “news media” to give us any meaningful information. Their job is to hide and/or twist the truth, not to reveal it.

The Ruling Elites Hate Your Guts So Why Not Separate?

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Want to know what the political intelligentsia really thinks of all us deplorables? Want to know what we have to look forward to under a Harris/Biden regime?

Michael Beller, Principle Counsel for the Public Broadcasting Service has told us inadvertently in new undercover footage from Project Veritas which I am sure Mr. Beller would rather had not gotten out there. This sterling individual is a perfect example of what we can expect from a Harris/Biden regime in upcoming months. He is sort of a sneak preview ahead of schedule. Were he a Trump supporter some of what he said would probably have landed him in jail but since he obviously hates Trump’s guts he is perfectly safe.

Before the recent fraudulent elections he advised leftists that, should Trump win, they should “go to the White House and throw Molotov cocktails.” And he told us his views for our future. He said “Even if Biden wins, we go for all the Republican voters and Homeland Security will take their children away–we’ll put them into the re-education camps.” Mr. Beller sounds like a really charming fellow–a prince among hardcore leftists. The epitome of leftist charity. So what does he think of his political adversaries? He says: “They’ll (Trump supporters) be raising a generation of intolerant, horrible people–horrible kids.” He also thought it might be a good thing if COVID were to spike in Republican-led states because it would mean that more Trump supporters would be dying. Can’t you tell from the his restrained commentary that this man positively oozes compassion? And the Democrats are about to impeach Trump yet again because they claim he “incites violence.” Of course Mr. Beller’s comments about Molotov cocktails do not incite violence because we all know that those on the left are incapable of violence–except to those who dare to disagree with them!

Beller also went into a profanity-laced tirade about how dumb the American people are. I would submit, at this point, that the really dumb ones might just be among those who listen to Public Broadcasting.

Boyd Cathey, in an article on https://www.lewrockwell.com for January 11th has noted the intent of these same people when he said: “Not just ‘cancel’ Donald Trump, but all the ‘deplorables’ of any high public profile, anyone who might raise a voice to actually oppose their ploys. Their inflexible censorship and their ability to ‘de-person’ almost anyone, and their control of education and the media are imposing an Iron Curtain over what is left of America, more fearful and more sweeping than anything Joe Stalin ever dreamed of. Indeed ,one can rightly argue that those demonic forces–let us call them what they are: ‘the forces of anti-Western Christian civilization’–have had an upper hand since the defeat of the defenders of America’s old Constitution in 1865. But their steps in this process–their spreading infection–have taken more than a full century to effect success. Now, before our very eyes their victory appears imminent.” Dr. Cathey perfectly dates the main start of our many troubles with the defeat of the Confederacy in 1865.

In his recent book Red State Red County Secession–Creating a Nation of Our Own (Scuppernong Press) Ron Kennedy notes that part of our problem is many of America’s “conservatives.” Ron says “America’s conservatives are “counterfeit conservatives, because during the past one hundred years of the ‘conservative movement’ conservatives have not conserved anything! Conservatives stood by as liberals/progressives slowly destroyed the very fabric of our Constitutionally limited Republic. They offered no effective alternative to the insidious efforts of the left to destroy America’s moral standards. The current, politically correct, neo-Marxist America is damning evidence of one hundred years of conservative failure. At best, conservatives are a mere placeholder for the left, giving the appearance of an opposition party. Do you now begin to wonder why so few “conservatives” have been really willing to help Donald Trump in his battles against the leftists? It is because, in their heart of hearts, they are leftists too. They don’t dare tell us that because it would give the game away.

Our “two party system” really isn’t. A friend of mine has described it as “two wings on the same bird, both flying in the wrong direction.” While some good folks may disagree, what we have to consider is that if we can’t reverse the course we are presently on then secession is a viable option that needs to be considered. Indeed, if the country cannot find a way to address the mountain of cultural and political differences the different areas are now experiencing then secession needs to be studied. We cannot continue as we are indefinitely. The leftists, with their “search and destroy” mentality toward their adversaries will eventually get to where you cannot even think about co-existing with them because they embody a “rule or ruin” worldview as leftists always have. If you cannot overcome them then some form of separation becomes inevitable if your culture is to survive when the left seeks to destroy it. The question of secession needs to be addressed, not ignored.