Folks, We Are The Dirt Under Hillary’s Establishment Feet

by Al Benson Jr.

Us folks who are Hillary’s “deplorables” and “irredeemables” have also now been labeled as “fundamentally UnAmerican” which should show us what this “gracious” woman really thinks of the vast majority of us in this country. As a long-tenured Establishment Elitist, she considers us the dirt under her feet, the off-scourings of the universe.

How anyone could even remotely consider this woman to be “for” any group that is not associated with the Far Left simply beggars the imagination. Anyone who considers her to be anyplace other than in George Soros’ back pocket is simply not paying attention or does not live in the real world.

A small example–According to the book Armageddon by Dick Morris and Eileen McGann, on page 51, Hillary was on record as being against drivers licenses for “undocumented people.” In other words, to be a little less politically correct, illegal aliens shouldn’t get them. That was in 2008 when she ran for president and was told to step aside and make room for Obama. Her turn would come later. But now, after eight years of rule under Comrade Obama, in which he forcefully moved this country much further to the Left, often with the complicity of a Republican-controlled Congress, Hillary senses the time is right to flip-flop on this issue. Now she thinks  “state policies” that let illegal aliens have drivers licenses are just great. No doubt she’d love to have them vote, too (the Establishment is working on that) and so would Obama and about sixty percent of Congress–not all of them Democrats. After all, why let a little thing like lack of citizenship stand in the way? When you are an advocate of doing away with national borders and creating a continent-wide mega state for all and open to all no matter what, the concept of people having to be citizens of the country they vote in is hardly worth the mention, is it?

At any rate, “Mother Hillary” has just taken yet another swipe at her disobedient children according to another WikiLeaks revelation. In an article on written by Kristie McDonald, we are told: “In another WikiLeaks reveal, Hillary Clinton told Goldman Sachs in her October 2013 speech to executives that Americans who want to limit immigration are ‘fundamentally un-American’.” Specifically she said “I don’t care where they’re from. They have to be rejected because they are fundamentally un-American.” So, if you don’t care to have a ton of new Muslim immigrants from the Middle East overwhelm your neighborhood, with possibly some of them raping your daughters, because that’s what they do where they came from,  why you are simply “un-American.” You just don’t appreciate the “diversity” of cultures across the world when you should really be overjoyed to have these people living among you in growing numbers. The raping of your daughters is a small price you should be glad to pay  for the privilege of being able to partake of Hillary’s  (and George Soros’) plan for “diversity and multi-culturalism.”  I mean, how ungrateful can you be for not wanting this???

Hillary said in that speech,: “What I really resent about the obstructionists is they have such a narrow view of America. They see America in a way that is no longer reflective of the reality of who we are.” All I can say is–if we ever become what Hillary envisions for us–then only God can help us, for no one else will be able to.Hillary noted in her Goldman Sachs speech  that being “American is not a national identity, but rather an intellectual invention.” McDonald noted, at the end of her article that “Clinton’s declaration seems to echo a sentiment that has been expressed by mass migration enthusiast Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan” who, in my opinion, should never have been entrusted with the job he now has. Paul Ryan is living proof that socialists in both major parties can eagerly work together to fulfill  Obama’s vision to “fundamentally transform the United States” into a Third World socialist utopia along the lines of what we now see in Zimbabwe. That’s their plan for us in this country. Doesn’t it just make you drool in anticipation?

The Congressmen who voted to make Ryan the House Speaker because they naively thought he was “conservative” hardly deserve our vote of confidence, at the polls or anywhere else. What they do deserve is questions from a ticked off electorate asking these Congressmen  “Why in h— did you do that? Whose side are you on anyway?” But then, if they honestly answered that question, I’m not sure many of us would like the answer.

Have you ever wondered how many Republican congressmen think the same of us as Hillary does? The truth would hardly give you the warm fuzzies! In all honesty, we have a government that is utterly corrupt to the core–in both parties, at all levels. We have “conservative” congress critters that, at heart, are really Hillaryites–and they display that more and more daily. The voters really need to start looking at these people and what they do. If you do, I guarantee that, unless you are some sort of socialist, you won’t like it.

If the Establishment manages to steal this election from Trump, even if he wins it, then in all honesty, I have to ask–do you now begin to understand why the Confederate States seceded in 1860-61? Back then it was just the Southern folks that were the “deplorables” along with some of the Copperheads that realized what the game was.  Now it’s everyone that isn’t a raving Leftist! That fact may give you some small idea of how “reconstruction” in this country after the War of Northern Aggression really worked–and is still working.

Establishment Double Standard–one set of rules for us and another for them

by Al Benson Jr.

It should be overtly obvious by now that the Ruling Political Establishment,  composed of both Republicans and Democrats, is not subject to the same rules and laws they make for the rest of us. We are held to a rigid standard and they are held to no standard except “the end justifies the means.” They are allowed to do whatever they want in their pursuit of the New World Order. They are, truly, above the law unless they tick off someone higher up in the echelons and then they might be prosecuted, not because it fulfills the law,  but rather because it fulfills some vengeful spirit’s spur of the moment anger that his or her edicts were not followed according to their wishes. Welcome to 21st century Amerika! It’s where “good is evil and evil is good.”

I have read more articles of late than I care to mention about what goes on in the country and believe me, it is not an exercise in delight and happiness. People who think I look mad all the time should read some of the stuff I have to read.

I checked my email this morning, to find 600 messages on it, some adds, a handful personal communications and the rest articles or research material about the sad state of the country. I will share just a few so you get the idea.

This from the headline for which was: “Hidden Camera Catches Clinton Campaign Approving Destruction Of GOP Voter Registration Forms.” The article goes on to explain how a hidden camera caught a field organizer for Hillary’s campaign in Florida okaying  the destruction of Republican voter registration forms by someone who posed as a campaign worker.

A reporter for Project Veritas Action pretended to be a campaign worker and told the Clinton field organizer he had ripped up a batch of GOP voter registration forms and he asked the field organizer if he “was okay with that.” He replied “yeah.” When he said he was concerned he might get in trouble for doing that the field director “assured him it was OK and he would not be reporting the incident.  As long as you don’t make it a habit.” The field director was later asked about this incident and denied he’d ever had the conversation, as he took off for his vehicle and left the area. The article continued: “This is not the first time the Clinton campaign has been secretly videoed seemingly condoning questionable voter registration practices.” If this had been a Republican field director doing this it would have been all over the papers and the TV news but because it was Hillary’s people it gets ignored.

And then this article from The Washington Times which appeared on which was headlined: “Clinton campaign mocks Catholics, Southerners, ‘needy Latinos’ in emails.” The article was written by Ben Wolfgang and appeared on October 12, 2016. Some of this material came from the Wikileaks emails. Mr. Wolfgang wrote: “Long before Hillary Clinton called millions of Americans a ‘basket of deplorables,’ her top campaign advisers and liberal allies open mocked Catholics, Southerners and a host of other groups, according to newly released emails that offer a stunning window into the vitriol inside the Clinton world less than a month before election day…The sheer number of insults in the email trove has left the Clinton campaign, along with outside organizations such as the Center for American Progress that were routinely involved in the brutal bad-mouthing, unable or unwilling to respond.” So instead of responding they are trying to blame Russia for the hacks. The old “bait and switch” tactic. So us rubes out here in flyover country really know what Hildebeast thinks of us. Why anyone would want to support this woman, with her record, is beyond me. Her campaign engages in the same schlock stuff they blame the Trump campaign for doing, but because its Hillary and her friends, why that’s okay.

It’s right for Hillary but wrong for Trump! It’s cultural Marxism in living color! And then there was an article on by Kit Daniels, which stated, in part, “The Clinton Campaign worried about Hillary’s lack of ’emotional connection’ to everyday Americans. Democratic strategist  Steve Hildebrand told Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta that Hillary  must “find an emotional connection to regular Americans…Hillary has got to get away from Washington speak and begin immediately to find an emotional connection to regular  Americans. She needs to have a greater understanding of what people and families are going through every day…”

Now come on folks, in all honesty, does anyone really think Hillary gives a tinker’s damn about what ordinary Americans go through every day. Her previous commentary about most of us being deplorables and irredeemables  shows or should show, what she thinks of us. All we are is a bunch of “racist” rednecks to be used, if possible, to further her goal of reaching the White House so our real un-elected rulers can hand her their agenda to force on us. In other words, she’s the middleman, er, excuse me, the “middleperson” between the dictators and the serfs. And, of course, in that position, and before, she can pretty much do what she wants, as the laws that apply to us do not apply to her.

All these alleged sex allegations about Trump are nothing more than  diversion so ordinary folks will not pay too much attention to some of the damning material coming out with the Wikileaks exposures where she is giving speeches in Brazil telling the bankers there she is ready to do away with US borders and just let everyone come in. The fact that she will be destroying this country’s culture is one that has occurred to her just like it has occurred to Comrade Obama–and she couldn’t care less.

If this country is to be saved we will have to repent, turn to the Lord, and ask Him what we need to do–and the Church had better learn how to lead the way.

The Bovine Fertilizer of Hillary’s Second Debate “Win”

by Al Benson Jr.

All the major networks (Ted Turner used to call them “nitworks,” and that’s probably the only thing he and I would agree on) proclaimed  Her Majesty, Hillary the First, as the resounding winner of the second presidential debate. I realize, what with the “news” media being bought and paid for, that this is the only conclusion they would dare to come up with, but I watched the debate.  As far as Queen Hillary being the resounding winner, I would beg to differ. Interesting that all the major nitworks  proclaimed Hillary the winner while just about all the alternative media I checked out felt that Trump trashed Hillary.  I would tend to go along with that assessment.

I felt from the get-go that Clinton would seek to divert the viewing public way away from her email indiscretions, the Clinton Foundation, Benghazi, and all the rest of her political faux pas by majoring on the eleven year old tape of Trump using offensive and lewd language in regard to women. That was going to be the crowning touch in her argument as to why Trump should never be president. I think she really thought she had a cinch hand and could play it any way she wanted to.

She soon discovered that there were going to be parameters on how she played this hand when Trump brought in four of the women that her husband, Slick Willy, had been accused of raping over the years, one of which he had had to pay a huge settlement to to keep the matter out of court. You should have seen Slick Willy’s face when those women came in. You could have knocked him over with a wet noodle. He was less than a happy camper and Trump was telling her, in effect, “if you want to go there then I can play the same game.” He never said the words but the message was there and Hillary had enough political savvy to get it. They both ended up “going there” as the evening wore on, but not to the extent they could have.

Trump showed a lot more fight in the second debate than he did on the first go-round and he got his licks in. Of course that wasn’t always easy, as there were two moderators and Trump noted on more than one occasion that he was, in effect, having to debate three people instead of one. That was an accurate assessment, but then, that’s how these presidential debates usually work out–the socialist candidate plus the “moderator(s)” all ganging up on the conservative or patriotic candidate. That’s standard operating procedure.

Each candidate was supposedly allotted two minutes to answer a question but the moderators, somehow,  usually managed to lose track of the time Hillary had used to ramble on and on while they made dead sure Trump never got to go beyond his time, and he noted that a time or two also. There was a board in the room that kept track of the time, the same type you have a ball games, and when the candidate’s time was up it registered zero. Several times Hillary ran over her time and it registered zero and the moderators just let her keep going, showing no indication whatever to shut her up. I guess it became apparent to someone there that the television audience could see when zeroes showed up on the board because during the last half of the debate you never saw the board again. The cameras must have moved one way or the other to take it out of view.

Trump brought up several controversial topics that needed to be discussed and in each case Hillary sat there with an almost goofy smile on her face and when he got through talking she would get up and utter some inanity to the effect of “that’s not quite accurate” but she never quite got around to just what “accurate” really was. I wondered, watching her facial expressions as they turned from a near frown to sort of a silly smile, if she started smiling when the answer she was supposed to give Trump came through the ear piece she had seemed to wear in the first debate, the one that no one talked about. Other than something like that,  you could almost have thought she was trying to chew on silly putty.

Trump was much sharper in the second debate and he talked about issues while she sort of rambled about them, telling everyone all her grandiose plans if she was elected. At one point she prattled about her 30 years of political experience and Trump asked why, after 30 years, hadn’t she made any of the changes she now seemed so badly to want to make. At one point she said something like “I can only imagine what this country would be like if Donald were president” to which Trump replied “If I were president you’d be in jail.” That one drew applause, much to the chagrin of the “objective” moderators.

Now I may be a bit biased, but in my opinion, Trump, by having those rape cictime out there in front of the audience to sit there and stare at Slick Willy, knew how to pllaly his cards and he did pretty well against a stacked deck–not that the “news” media can afford to admit that.

The Klinton’s October Surprise

by Al Benson Jr.

There is an old Marxist ploy which many of us from the Cold War Era call “Condemn others, elevate yourself.” It’s a simple trick but it usually works because most people have not been taught to think well enough anymore to be able to put situations into perspective. Therefore, if you want to destroy someone’s reputation or credibility or both, you simply accuse him of the same type of thing you have been doing yourself and with the help of a compliant and prostitute media you can usually bring it off and appear to be taking the moral high ground, when actually your “high” ground is usually lower that that of the person you are trying to drag through the mud.

Such is the case with the Trump tape where Trump is heard making lewd and offensive comments about women. Now no moral person condones what he said and I think most normal people realize that, but the whole deal here is to make Trump look horrendous to the public at large right before the next presidential debate, which is tonight, October 9th.  Why they had to hold one of these things on a Sunday is beond me. They couldn’t have waited until Monday? They had to drag this thing into the Lord’s Day?

That the intent of this tape is to portray Trump as the scum of the earth there can be no doubt. And its effect has been demonstrated among the gutless wonders that parade as Republican politicians as they rush to distance themselves from Trump on so-called “moral” grounds. Most of them owe their souls to the Ruling Republican Establishment and so never wanted Trump to begin with, as his candidacy threatened to disrupt the CFR/Trilateralist agenda of their bosses for moving this country toward One World Government.

So let’s attempt to put this into perspective, looking at the situation as it pertains to Trump and the Clintons. For Trump, this is one comment he made eleven years ago. As far as the prostitute press is concerned he might as well have said it ten minutes ago, but he said it eleven years ago.  And he has apologized for it. Not that this makes any difference to the managed media. The comment is touted and the apology ignored.

So you have to ask–is he the same man now he was eleven years ago? Probably not. I know I’m not and I don’t think most folks are. Over the course of a little over a decade people’s views change and, hopefully, mature. I probably understand things now I didn’t have a clue about eleven years ago and many of us probably said things eleven years ago we probably would not say today because we know better. Lord willing, we all grow and learn, at least we should, and Trump is no exception.

So here we have something that Trump said, but it was only talk, lewd locker room talk admittedly, but still talk. Kind of like the talk we hear about Hillary being indicted for her corruption–just talk.

Yet we are now supposed to concentrate totally on Trump’s talk and totally forget all about Hillary’s thoroughgoing corruption over the decades. And we are also supposed to disremember  all things pertaining to her “significant other” and what he did to all those women whose names you all have seen in the news over the years and we are all now supposed to forget how Hillary was basically an enabler for her husband’s activities and how she tried to silence all the women that brought rape allegations against Bill. We are all supposed to forget Monica Lewinsky and the “blue dress” and all that like it never happened. None of that is to be remembered tonight at the debate–only Trump’s eleven year old statement. All Klinton indiscretions are to be forgotten–wiped out of memory as surely as Hillary’s email servers were wiped off and Trump is to be raked over the coals not only by Hillary, but also by the supposedly neutral “moderator” who, in reality, will be the second person on Hillary’s debating team.

If you ever wanted to see and exercise in Marxist doublespeak watch the debate.

And while I surely don’t, in any way, condone Trump’s comments of eleven years ago, I have to remember that they were eleven years ago and not eleven minutes ago.  I hope he fights back–because he is not the most guilty party in this Leftist-engineered scenario. The timing of this Trump tape’s release to the public is no coincidence.

Louisiana Had (and Has) Precious Little to Thank Washington For

by Al Benson Jr.

Have just finished reading Richard Taylor and the Red River Campaign of 1864 by Samuel W. Mitcham Jr. It was a very informative book on the infamous Red River Campaign (and Union cotton-stealing expedition) in Louisiana in the Spring of 1864.

Union General (and presidential aspirant) Nathaniel (Commissary) Banks led a Union army of over 30,000 men, which included several U S Navy boats and Commodore David Dixon Porter in a campaign to capture Shreveport, Louisiana for the glorious Union. The Navy folks and their vessels were supposedly along to aid General Banks in this effort, but most of them were much more interested in “appropriating” as much Louisiana cotton as they could get their hands on. Made no difference whether it was cotton owned by the Confederate government or privately-owned cotton, as the Navy got a cut out of whatever they managed to “confiscate.”

Opposing this Northern redistribution of Southern wealth by Lincoln’s “indestructible” Union was General Richard Taylor and a little over 5,000 men, mostly from Louisiana, Texas and Arizona. Believe it or not, with over 30,000 men and the help of the U S Navy, Banks couldn’t get it done, and Dick Taylor, as they say here in Louisiana, “whupped his ass.”

After he got as far as Mansfield and got solidly beaten there, Banks started his retreat back south. But at first he refused to call it a retreat, rather he labeled it a “retrograde” movement. That’s Yankee/Marxist language for a retreat without coming out and admitting it. However, the Yankee/Marxist soldiers who had been legitimately defeated at Mansfield were going to make sure they got back at the folks in Louisiana because they tried to defend their homes and property. Louisiana folks hadn’t learned that when the Yankee/Marxists come calling then defending your home and property is a no-no. Yankee/Marxists have no use whatever for private property–unless they can steal it, and naturally they always steal it for “the people.”

According to Mr. Mitcham, Confederate Lt. Col. Francis Richard Lubbock wrote: “The demoralized enemy in their retreat left no houses or fences, stock or supplies, behind them.  Everything of any possible value was taken or destroyed.” And Elias P. Pellet of the 114th New York Volunteers was honest enough to agree with Lubbock in his history of the 114th Regiment when he wrote: “Destruction and desolation followed on the trail of the retreating column. At night, the burning buildings mark our pathway. As far as the eye can reach, we see in front new fires breaking out, and in the rear the dying embers tell the tale of war. Hardly a building is left unharmed…The wanton and useless destruction of property has well earned (A. J. Smith’s) command a lasting disgrace…” A. J. (Whiskey) Smith was one of the Yankee/Marxist commanders under Banks and he had that nickname because he was rather too fond of the bottle.

Mr Mitcham also write: “To deprive both Rebels and civilians of food and water, wells were fouled and animals were shot, including cows, calves, hogs, horses, chickens, and mules. Houses, barns, corncribs, smokehouses, chicken coops, and Negro cabins were all burned.” It seems that “Firebug” Sherman in Georgia was not the only Yankee/Marxist arsonist during the War. It was probably a toss-up between Whiskey Smith and Phil Sheridan in Virginia as to who would get second place to Sherman. This commentary regarding Yankee arsonism is on page 250 of Mr. Mitcham’s book. He continues with more of the same on pages 259-60. Not fun reading unless you are a Yankee arsonist. They literally destroyed everything in their path even when it had no military value. You have to understand, they were making war on civilians as well as soldiers, and what’s more, they seemed to enjoy doing it.

On page 306 Mr. Mitcham made a very telling observation, which most folks today would probably not even think about. He wrote: “It took Louisiana almost a century to recover from the war,  and it has yet to recover its previous position. In 1860, it was ranked second in the Union in per capita income, and half of all American millionaires lived along the Natchez-New Orleans axis. Today it ranks forty-first in per capita income…”

The thought occurred to me, as I read this, that, starting with the major cotton theft here in Louisiana and in other places in the South as well, the War of Northern Aggression was one gigantic redistribution of the wealth scheme, not only to destroy our culture but to bleed us dry financially also. Didn’t von Clauswitz say that “war was the pursuit of political goals by ‘other means.'” If the “political goal” is to destroy the South, then for the Yankee/Marxist, war is a legitimate option.

You might say that this was the “Neanderthal version” of cultural Marxism, along with “reconstruction” later that was to deliver the coup d’ etat to the culture, faith, and financial stability of the South.  They weren’t able to take it quite as far as they would have liked to, but give the Yankee/Marxists credit–they did their absolute best to contribute to our destruction and demise as a distinct people–and they are still working on that as I write this.

Our problem is that the majority of our folks don’t realize that “those people” are still fighting their war against us. We quit fighting. They didn’t! All they did was to change their tactics. We are seeing the latest development of their new tactics in our day.

To their way of thinking the War will not be over until they have completely destroyed us, our faith and culture. They want our grandchildrens’ souls in their hip pocket. That’s a truth we have to begin to realize and so far, I don’t think we’ve grasped it yet.

Goodbye Internet–Congress Still Yawning

by Al Benson Jr.

Several days ago I posted an article about how our beloved ruler, in his Marxist omniscience, was planning to give the Internet in this country to some other, outside governing body, which would then “regulate” (control its content) so that Americans would not have it to garner information from and we would be back to depending on the same old hackneyed Establishment “news” media for what we needed to know about how government was stiffing us.

Actually it probably wasn’t our beloved ruler personally that came up with this but rather the Establishment creatures that give him his marching orders and the agenda he is to follow if he wants to remain in office. These are the same people who will do the exact same thing for Hillary when she ascends to the throne in the White House.

The information I received about this gave the numbers of bills in both House and Senate that had been introduced to combat this, but it seems that, in both houses these bills we “in committee” which means that’s probably where they would die a natural death. Very few senators and house members co-sponsored these bills, which means we had (and have) a bad case of congressional apathy. Most of them really didn’t give a hoot, in fact some of them might have actually been happy to see this happen as it might mean, if some foreign body ends up “regulating” the Internet there might be less  negative info available about them to ordinary folks. And they wonder why the approval rate for Congress hovers around 6 percent!

Per the request I received about this I did contact my senators and representative urging them to sign up and co-sponsor the bills that would potentially keep the Internet in US hands and out of UN hands. The response I have received from my elected representatives has, shall we say, been rather underwhelming. I got one, rather tepid letter back from one senator that assured me he’d keep my views in mind on this subject. Nothing more. The other two didn’t bother. If other congress critters around the country have shown as much concern as the congress critters here in North Louisiana  I have to conclude that Congress, as a whole, couldn’t care less about the UN controlling the Internet instead of the US. That bothers me. Because if Congress is too lethargic  to care about the flow of information to US citizens free of UN control, then what else is there out there that concerns us that they just don’t care about?

Actually, I was a bit surprised. Usually my representative and senators are pretty good on the issues I write to them about and I do write to them about what bothers me. I have contacted them so often about Second Amendment issues I am surprised they don’t know me by the first name. They know when some gun control issue comes up they will get a communication from me letting them know what I think they should do. But on this issue, they seem mostly dead in the water–and I wonder why.

What’s going on that everyone shies away from dealing with our handing control of the Internet over to the UN or some other equally reprehensible foreign body? What’s the deal here?

Today is the last supposedly “free” day for the Internet and it’s not that our Congress is apathetic–it’s just that they don’t seem to care very much. I just contacted the one senator that bothered to write me and told him his letter was rather tepid and didn’t really tell me much. It looked like the kind of letter some ribbon clerk up on the 6th floor in an un-air conditioned office wrote and not what I usually get from this man.

I am beginning to wonder if Congress has been told to back off on this issue and just let it happen–all in the “national interest” of course. Figured I’d better post this today while I still had the chance as I don’t know how welcome it will be tomorrow or thereafter.

Trump says he wants to make America great again. If the current Marxist administration has its way it’s not going to leave him very much to work with!

Marxists and Monuments in New Orleans (and elsewhere)

by Al Benson Jr.

Well, today (September 24th) is the day that a far left group called “Take ‘Em Down Nola” which has aligned itself with Black Lives Matter, has decided that the statue of Andrew Jackson in New Orleans has to come down. It’s got to be done today. These worthies claim that the police in New Orleans will just have to step aside and watch while they dismantle the statue of Jackson which is in the French Quarter. This group has made threats against the police and Mayor Mitch Landrieu in the past. Had anyone on the right side of the political spectrum done such it would have been a federal crime of almost international proportions but as long as someone on the left has made the threats they will be ignored. That’s the way “equality under the law” works in this country anymore.  The left goes to jail and immediately gets a free pass out. The rigt just goes to jail for 99 years and the key is thrown away.

This leftist group claims they want to police to step aside so they can do their “civic duty.” You see, in the murky netherworld of the theological and political left, vandalism is redefined  as a civic duty as long as what you are tearing down is part of white culture. I guess we will just have to wait until the end of the day to find out whether these cultural Marxists were allowed by authorities in New Orleans to perform their “civic duty.” Somehow, I can’t imagine the mayor of New Orleans giving them all that much of a hassle. I’m sure if they decided to do their “civic duty” with Confederate monuments (which they yet may) Comrade Landrieu would have a field day!

As for the group they are aligned with, Black Lives Matter, it’s been around since 2013, formed by Alicia Garza who, according to has described herself as a “queer social justice activist who reveres the Marxist revolutionary, former Black Panther, and convicted cop-killer Assata Shakur for her contributions to the Black Liberation Movement.” Garza collaborated with two others of her Marxist ilk to form the Black Lives Matter group.

Discover the Networks also observed that “Though BLM is intended to represent the needs and grievances of all black people, Garza makes it clear that her organization is especially committed to helping ‘Black queer and trans folks’…” These people do let you know what they are all about.

The platform for Black Lives Matter states, in part: “We believe in elevating the experiences and leadership of the most marginalized Black people, including but not limited to those who are women, queer, trans, femmes, gender nonconforming, Muslim, formerly and currently incarcerated…” You can tell this is a Marxist group. They support all the right people.

In an article written for Conservative Daily Post Eric Whittle wrote on September 23rd that: “Regardless, one spokesperson for Take “Em Down Nola said that they would forcefully remove the (Jackson) monument if necessary, adding ‘that’s not a threat, that’s a promise.’ Take ‘Em Down Nola vandalized monuments with the message ‘take ’em down or we will.” How much more will it take to make folks realize their culture and way of life is under assault?

Just out of curiosity, I wonder how many of those that claim to belong to this second cousin to Black Lives Matter are really from New Orleans and how many are imports brought in from somewhere else to help stoke the fires of “civil rights.” That is a common tactic among Marxist groups–bringing in outsiders to help spread the mayhem and claiming they are all discontented local folks when actually many of them are nothing more than professional leftist agitators.

A good case in point is the riots in Charlotte, North Carolina,  by the merest coincidence, taking place at the same time as the current brouhaha in New Orleans.

An article on for September 23rd by Tyler Durden noted the comments of a man from the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Fraternal Order of Police. He said: “This is not Charlotte out here. These are outside entities that are coming in and causing these problems. These are not protesters, these are criminals…if you go back and look at some of the arrests that were made last night.I can about say probably 70% of those had out-of-state IDs. They’re not coming from Charlotte.” And Mr. Durden also observed that “18 months ago, as the riots flared in Ferguson, there was one man pulling the strings of this domestic false flag…George Soros.  George Soros donated $33 million to social justice organizations which helped turn the events in Ferguson  from a local protest into a national flashpoint.” Soros has also funded Black Lives Matter, the second cousin to this group in New Orleans that is working to tear your culture down.

It’s about time, in fact it’s long past time that we in the South woke up and realized that there is a concerted Marxist and One World Government agenda afoot to totally dismantle and do away with our history, faith, culture and heritage–and most of us blithely sit back and watch it happen. Then we complain when our grandchildren grow up to be little Marxists. You better wake up and smell the coffee while there is still some left to smell!