The Religious Faith of the Left

by Al Benson Jr.

Member Board of Directors Confederate Society of America

As we witness the destruction caused by the Leftists in their demonstrations and riots around the country, their vitriol toward Donald Trump, and their seemingly irrational hatred of anything good and decent, we are forced to admit, whether we want to or not, that these people have an underlying theological belief to all that they have done and are doing. Their continuing destruction is but one method of faith and practice that shows us the theological nature of what they do.

Their seemingly senseless (not really) attacks on any system of belief save their own is something that transcends mere political or economic opposition. They are acting out their theology, and not theirs alone, but also the theology of those who finance much of their destruction. They are acting out the theology of their father, the one Saul Alinsky dedicated his book Rules for Radicals to. Some of them probably don’t have a clue about this. Many do.

The acting out of this theology is not a new thing in this country, or in Europe, or anywhere else for that matter. You can trace it back to the Tower of Babel in Genesis 11 in the Holy Scriptures. At that point the Lord showed them what He thought of their feeble effort at One World Government by confusing their languages and having them separate from one another. However, due to their sinful natures, their descendants did not learn and they still haven’t, and so eruptions of this Luciferian theology have continued down through the ages, some more apparent than others.

One manifestation that showed up in Europe in the late 1700s in what we know as the French Revolution. The fomenters of that horrendous event hated the biblical concept of original sin and so to rid themselves of that truth they sought to implement a whole new religious system. They wouldn’t have called it that but that’s what it really was. In their new system they became god, deciding what was good and evil. We all know how that worked out.

Another Luciferian manifestation showed up in several countries in Europe in 1848-49, where attempts were made to overthrow existing legitimate governments and replace them with centralized, collectivist regimes. And please don’t tell me that was all about “peace, freedom and democracy.” I know better. That same year Karl Marx had the Communist Manifesto published. At that point, Marx was little more than a hack writer and all he did with the manifesto was to promote the theology of those who hired him to write it. The thoughts in it were probably not mostly his own. They were the theology and commandments of  group called The League of the Just, which had ties to the Illuminati.  Marx’s name did not even appear on the first edition.

Lots of people that sought to overthrow their governments in Europe at that point, when their revolts failed, ended up coming to this country and they brought their Luciferian theology with them and continued to spread it, not only throughout the 1850s but also after the War of Northern Aggression started. Many of them jointed the Union armies and became generals and high priests of their theology both during the War and after.

Those who think that War was strictly fought over economic issues have not fully grasped what it was really all about. It was a war to destroy the Southern states and their history, heritage and culture–a culture and heritage that, for all its faults, was undeniably Christian in its worldview. A Christian South was something that the practitioners of Leftist theology simply could not put up with.  The Christian worldview of the South, and wherever else it resided in the country had to go. It was an impediment to the spread of Leftist theology. And that theology was best expressed in the ten points Marx wrote about in the manifesto the League of the Just had hired him to write.

If you haven’t done so you should get a copy of the Communist Manifesto sometime and read it. Now Marx was as dull a writer as you’d find. Reading his stuff is somewhat less exciting than sitting and watching paint dry, but, when he came to the ten points previously mentioned, he was quite succinct in outlining them. Check them over and see if you can tell how many of them have already been enacted into law in this country–all the way from the “heavy, progressive graduated income tax” to “free education for all children in public schools.”

The theology that governed Marx and those who followed him is the same theology that governs the Trump-haters in our day. It’s the same theology that allows for millions of unborn children to be aborted (murdered) every year for the sake of “convenience.”  It’s the same theology that allows those on the Left to shoot congressmen because they have introduced legislation to do away with Elite Pedophilia. According to an article on http://www.wnd.com the man who shot Congressman Steve Scalise had a “kill list” of Republicans he wanted to assassinate, mostly members of the Freedom Caucus. You have to understand, in the Leftist religion, political assassinations of your enemies are high sacraments, surpassed only by those sacraments that allow for even more bloodletting, like riots in cities, which some of Lucifer’s disciples willingly finance.

Now I realize that lots of folks, when they see that this article is about religion, will not bother to read it–too weighty a subject for them. It’s even too weighty for many Christians, because many of our churches have managed to dumb down their congregations just like the public schools have dumbed down their students. But, maybe a few courageous souls will make the effort to wade through it. It is for these few that it is written.

 

The “Compassionate” Left Just Shoots its Enemies

by Al Benson Jr.                                                                                                                   Member Board of Directors Confederate Society of America

In recent weeks it has really been displayed as to how truly “compassionate” and really open to “diversity” the political and theological Left really is. When all else fails, why just shoot your adversaries or perceived adversaries and then blame your actions on someone else’s actions or words. Of course the Leftists could just say “the Devil made me do it” and that would be pretty accurate, but preferring anything to honesty, the Leftists blather on about how “Trump made me do it” or “the Second Amendment forced me to take action so we could work at getting rid of it” or whatever other canned response they are supposed to give. To say that the Leftists and those who finance their actions are totally despicable is to state the case too mildly.  What those people really are is just not printable in this article so I will leave it to your imagination.

In recent weeks we have noted their words and actions toward Donald Trump. Had those words and actions been expended against Hitlery or Obama they would have been deemed a hate crime of grossest proportions. But, because those actions were taken against someone on the Right politically, they are not only perfectly acceptable, but the mainstream media simply adores them. This is cultural Marxism in living color, folks. This is one classic example of how it works.

That media “useful idiot” that held up the imitation of Trump’s bloody, decapitated head, even though she lost her job over it, is hailed as a glowing example of Leftist “diversity” and, no doubt, that Bernie Sanders supporter who shot Congressman Scalise  and several others this morning will be held up as yet another icon for the deranged Left to imitate. A comment on LewRockell.com this morning noted that “the cold civil war is turning hot.” When CNN, the epitome of fake news, reported on this morning’s shootings all they could say was “the gun kept shooting.” As though, somehow, the shooting was the fault of the gun rather than the man pulling the trigger!

Then there is that play in New York where President Trump gets assassinated on stage every evening. But that’s okay as long as the president is Trump. What do you think the reaction would be if the president in the play were Obama or Clinton? That would be treated as the hate crime of the century and the producers of the play would probably end up in the slammer, but because Trump is the president getting offed nightly it all gets a pass.

And there have been reports via the media, alternative and otherwise, that there could be a possible assassination attempt on Mr. Trump’s life. It’s a known fact that if the Leftists can’t get what they want any other way they are prone to try to remove obstacles to their agendas via assassination. So for them to make an attempt on Trump would be right up their alley. This is how they treat those who would dare to disagree with their version of how things should be done.

When the Leftists and those who finance them can’t get their way in some big city they stage a “peaceful protest” (read that riot)  and they destroy property and sometimes lives. This is what the Left always does. They are unable to create anything except mayhem and destruction–but that’s really what they are there for–as a tool of destruction to pave the way so that those who pay them for the destruction will then have a clear path to construct the “New World Order.” So the Leftists are bought and paid for–political prostitutes as it were. Now admittedly, they think more of themselves than that, but those who pay them don’t.

The shock troops of the Left may well end up starting a civil war in this country. There was a time when they could get totally away with all this evil, and it IS evil, so let’s don’t sugarcoat it with any of those pleasant-sounding Leftist euphemisms. However, that time has probably passed. The alternative media has done yeoman duty in alerting millions of Americans to much of what is going on, whereas, back when Nixon was forced out of office, there was hardly any alternative media to speak of. Now, thanks be to God, it is all over the place. There are many folks that don’t like InfoWars.com but the fact remains that they get something like 45 million viewers every month.  And then you have Breitbart, the Drudge Report, WorldNetDaily and a whole host of smaller ones that, believe it or not, actually expose what the Left and its financiers are doing. That’s the reason why Obama and his fellow Leftists wanted so badly to regulate the Internet–so they could begin to cut down on all the exposure the Leftists had been getting. They absolutely hate it when they realize you know what they are doing because it makes it that much harder for them to pull off.

One thing the Left hates is exposure (Ephesians 5:11), people learning about and exposing the evil they try to perpetrate daily. This is one way to fight back against them, exposing what they do and the reasons they do it, and, where possible, exposing those people that financially  enable them to do it.

There are some Christians that work at doing this. There needs to be more.

How We Fight Back

by Al Benson Jr.  Member Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Years ago I saw a Western movie about how a big rancher wanted to expand his holdings by driving a smaller rancher off his land and taking it over.  The smaller rancher didn’t boast and bluster about what he would do, he just quietly said “I’d advise you to leave me alone, because you won’t like the way I fight back.” And he didn’t. It eventually cost him his big ranch, lots of lost property, and lots of men.

It seems to me that folks in the Confederate and Southern Patriotic Movement have got to adopt the “you won’t like the way I fight back” mentality; because fight back we must, or our children and grandchildren will have no future worth the name. And when I say that I am not advocating illegal action. You can start looking for lots of legal ways to make our adversaries uncomfortable.

I just read an article that said the removal of the Confederate statues in New Orleans had cost $2.1 million dollars. Who’s going to pay for that? Supposedly, private funds were to be made available for that. Let’s wait and see. I have this sneaky suspicion that, when all is said and done,  the lucky New Orleans taxpayers will end up with most of the tab for this exercise in Cultural Genocide. Compliments of a mayor who wanted to please his black girlfriend!

On June 7th someone sent me an article about Forest Park in St. Louis, Missouri, where they are getting ready to take yet another Confederate monument down. They had barriers up and roads blocked to keep people away, supposedly for “safety.” Maybe they learned something from the protests in New Orleans. And the man that sent me this article wrote one of his own for his email list called More Marxist Socialism in action. That’s a good description. This man realizes what’s going on with this removal of all things Confederate–Marxist socialism! He nailed it! In fact, the more you read about the War and its results, the more you can begin to see that, from a Northern perspective, it was really a grand exercise in Marxist class struggle.

I have just finished recording a 35 minute CD that deals with that and hope to have promotional copies to send out this next week to potential promoters.

This was much more than just a North-South struggle and we must start getting our own folks informed enough so they can get beyond that and take a close look at those involved, especially those Leftist radicals that embraced Lincoln and the Northern cause, as well as the people that financed some of them.

One man who wrote sent a list of suggestions along as to how we should fight back, and some of them were not bad. He noted that we need Confederate flags everywhere and a big one along Highway 70 in St. Louis, NOW.  That’s a good idea. Actually we need Confederate flags along many of our highways in the South–all on private property of some sort; big, beautiful Confederate flags that you can see from a long way off. Several SCV groups have been working on this project in their respective areas and have been successful, as you can tell by the flak they are getting from “progressive” groups like the NAACP and others. The flags go up and suddenly the Leftists want to “dialogue” about it. And we shouldn’t buy into that ploy. Dialogue with those people is the kiss of death for our Movement. Those people have been trying to destroy our culture and heritage for decades now and we are supposed to dialogue with them??? That’s bovine fertilizer, and not even a  very high grade of it! Tel them “thanks, but no thanks. the flags you don’t like stay up, and if we catch you vandalizing them then we will see you in court.”

The same man also wrote (and I agree with him here, too) “We need to expose the rulers of the cities for what they do, and for the results.” If people were really aware of the leftward tilt of some of these city and town council members or some of the mayors of their cities, they might think twice about supporting what some of these people propose in regard to doing away with our heritage. All their chatter about “inclusiveness” and “diversity” is nothing more than a way to shut us out of the process and that’s all it is.  I have read about where some of these people who have wormed their way onto city councils are “community organizers.”  Community organizers are mostly communists who don’t want to go by that name. We just had a president who was a community organizer, remember? I only ever had experience with one other community organizer in my life, and he was what they refer to as “the genuine Communist article.” It’s long time past Southern folks started exposing the Leftist connections of those who want our heritage replaced with their own, and with some form of Leftism that our grandchildren will be forced to swallow.

Some have called for a monument project that celebrates both Western Civilization as well as Confederate heritage, and, while that is not a bad idea, most of us realize that our pockets are not all that deep at this point, but it’s a thought for the future. Right now we need to concentrate on getting more of those Confederate flags up–always on private property, and exposing the real nature and origin of our adversaries, whether we do it in articles, books, billboards, adds, or however, making sure we have solid documentation for what we say about them, and finding ways to get that out to the public at large.

There will be more to come later, but let’s go with this for now–promoting both our flags and the exposure of our Far Left adversaries.

So Where is Mitch Sleeping Tonight?

by Al Benson Jr.

Well, the Confederate monuments are all down in New Orleans and it seems that the political and religious Leftists have gotten their wish. There are some out there that are calling for a boycott of New Orleans and I can’t disagree with them. After what has transpired in that city why should any advocate of Southern heritage and history want to spend a thin dime there? You say “Well, after all, it’s a historical place.” That’s true, but after the cultural Marxists get through with their “social justice” romp throughout the city, how much real history will be left? Not as much as you’d like to think I’m afraid.

One of the main instigators of this historical carnage is the city’s infamous mayor, who pushed to get the Confederate monuments removed because, according to some, it would possibly pave the way for him to a possible presidential slot in 2020. And while that is probably true, or at least a major consideration for him, it seems, if you read between the lines, that there are “other” considerations for him also.

Someone sent me an article from a website called The Hayride,  http://thehayride.com  for May 17th of this year. It was authored by someone called MacAoidh, and I have no idea who that is, but it was an informative article. It dealt in part with the crime going on in New Orleans while the police were occupied watching the Confederate monuments being removed.

The article said, in part: “A city with crime on the level of Chicago should hve its leadership occupied with little else. Instead, New Orleans’ lame-duck mayor, Mitch Landrieu is desperately trying to deface and bowdlerize its cultural patrimony in order to create some sort of legacy he failed to earn through governance.” And that’s correct, but there’s more.

According to the Hayride article: “A Hayride source with knowledge of Landrieu’s private life indicated to us yesterday that the mayor no longer lives at home and has moved in with his mistress, a former communications director for the mayor’s office named Devona Dolliole. and that Ms. Dolliole, who is black, has been a personal influence on Landrieu’s dogged efforts to remove the monuments.” Is anyone surprised? And the former mayor, Moon Landrieu is supposed to be estranged from the current mayor over the campaign to denigrate the Confederate monuments. There is more to the article that I hesitate to get into here because it deals with legal issues regarding Landrieu’s fundraisers.

But at least you can see from this that there was more than one reason that Landrieu was so gung-ho to get those Confederate monuments down. No doubt his present “companion” is pleased  with his efforts, regardless of what those that pay his salary think.

The Elite Meet Today To Decide Our Future

by Al Benson Jr.

The annual meeting of the Bilderbergers for 2017 is being held this year in Chantilly, Virginia from June 1-4. The preliminaries are probably in progress as I write this. There was a time when the Establishment was able to keep these meetings almost totally secret and you couldn’t find out where they were bring held nor who was attending, and those few who did try to find out were hustled off the premises as though they had broken the cardinal law of Elitist Secrecy.

After awhile, though, that ceased to work real well, as some folks in the alternative media always seemed to manage to get in or at least get a list of the attendees and they passed that information out far and wide. And there is nothing wrong with that. When you have semi-secret groups of high mucky mucks meeting to plan the future of the world I think it’s a good thing for the public to be aware of that. The Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group are the three premier groups in this country that are trying to shuffle us all off into some sort of One World Government–and the more vehemently they deny that the more you’d better believe that some sort of World Government is their real agenda.

However, in their almost infinite wisdom, they have finally come to realize they can’t keep it all totally secret from us, the common herd, and so now they publish a list of attendees at their socialist soirees and hope we don’t recognize too many of the names. However, their discussions about our future remain secret even if the people doing the discussing don’t. For anyone interested in finding out who is attending these bashes you can go to http://www.BilderbergMeetings.org on the Internet and get a list of the Elite that plan how they think the rest of us should live in 2017. There is even a Face Book page out there called Bilderberg 2017 exposed. So all is not secret that they wish to be secret.

It is revealing to look at some of the names of those who will be in Chantilly for this confab. Some names jump out at you, like John O. Brennan, the Muslim convert who was the head of Obama’s CIA. Then there is Lindsey Graham, current U.S. Senator. I imagine there are some folks in his home state that would love to know what he is doing at a Bilderberg meeting. And Henry Kissinger is always at these things as one of the prime movers and shakers promoting One World Government. Then there is Terry McAuliffe, the Governor of Virginia. And H. R. McMaster, Mr. Trump’s National Security Adviser, and Peggy Noonan, author and columnist for the Wall Street Journal. Also attending is Wilbur Ross Jr., Mr. Trump’s Secretary of Commerce, as well as Nadia Schadlow, Deputy Assistant to the President, National Security Council, and Peter Thiel, who has been involved with the Trump administration. There is even a You Tube video out there called Will Donald Trump be at the 2017 Bilderberg?  I most assuredly hope he won’t, but it seems that several people in his administration will be. Not good news! These people represent a worldview that is supposedly anathema to that of Mr. Trump, and if that is really the case, then Mr. Trump has a bigger problem than even he realizes. Some in his administration are definitely advocates of One World Government in some form and if he is ever to accomplish what he says he wants to do he is going to have to find some way to remove those people and replace them with people that share his vision. His administration has been infiltrated by advocates of One World Government–and he needs to be aware of that if he isn’t.

Some of the topics that will be under discussion this year will be: The Trump Administration–a progress report; Can Globalisation be slowed down?; The War on Information (I bet that will be a dandy); and Why is Populism growing? Then there will be a discussion on Current Events, which I assume may be some kind of catch-all for everything they failed to cover with the other topics.

Many of those attending this conference display the fact that the Trump administration has lots of “swamp draining” to do if ever they plan on making lasting changes beneficial to the American people, because he has lots of people in his White House right now who have a vested interest in preserving the status quo and not changing anything that will help anyone but them and their leftist friends.

Nobody Wants to Talk Much About Seth Rich

by Al Benson Jr.

After having read several articles on the Internet pertaining to Seth Rich, I am beginning to get the impression that, for whatever reason, this is a murder case almost no one wants to talk about. When I see something of this nature I always wonder–why?

One article I read was on http://www.businessinsider.com written by David Choi on May 25th. It had the usual information in it about how Mr. Rich, a 27 year old DNC staff member, was shot in the back in what was supposed to have been a “botched robbery.” It seems Rich was on the phone at the time, had to hang up, and there seems to have been a scuffle between Rich and his killer.

Since his murder there have been many stories out there on the Internet as to what the reason was for his murder. I couldn’t prove any of them one way or the other, however, Mr. Choi’s story noted: “Rod Wheeler, a private investigator associated with Rich’s family, told a Fox News affiliate in Washington that there was evidence that proved the alleged contact between Rich and WikiLeaks. Wheeler also suggested that the Metropolitan Police Department tried to cover up the nature of Rich’s death on behalf of the DNC, an allegation the police department denied.”

Interestingly enough, Wheeler later retracted this statement, telling people he had gotten this information from a Fox reporter. Now I wonder why, if he had gotten this from a Fox reporter, did he then go on to pass it along to a Fox affiliate in Washington? Wouldn’t a Fox reporter already have done that? It just seems odd that he would pass something along to a Fox affiliate that he’d gotten from a Fox reporter. But then, you never know, and in many cases such as this you are not supposed to know.

Also, a couple weeks after Rich’s death, WikiLeaks dumped lots and lots of internal emails that seem to have come from the DNC and there is speculation that at least some of that might have come from Rich. If so, it makes you wonder why he did it if he did it. Again, we can’t say for sure. Did Rich see some things going on he didn’t approve of?

Commentary on a blog spot I read noted: “Rich was shot and killed last July in Northwest D.C. and police have suggested the killing in the District’s Bloomingdale neighborhood was a botched robbery. Funny, nothing taken and shot in the back. (Sound familiar?)”

On the same blog was another comment: “Yeah, then there’s the 32 year old man due to testify about Clinton the next week, found dead of an apparent ‘heart attack,’ just a couple weeks ago. Something stinks in Denmark…” This commentary was posted May 16th.

Sean Hannity covered some of this on Fox News recently and now, all of a sudden, he’s not covering it anymore and there is talk of him being “fired.” You might take each of these incidents separately and not make too much of any of them. But taken as a whole they at least raise some reasonable questions, not that I expect we will ever get any reasonable answers.

The Deep State folks will just dismiss it all as “conspiracy theories” and after they make that statement no one is supposed to ask anymore questions–ever again. Years ago Hillary made a statement about a “vast right wing conspiracy” that was out to get her husband. I wonder, does that make Hillary a conspiracy theorist?

It’s all kind of like the Warren Commission Report of the Kennedy assassination–which is supposed to be the defining document about John Kennedy’s assassination. In all honesty, does anyone believe the Warren Commission Report? No one I ever talked to believes it. And most folks are not going to believe that Seth Rich was the victim of a “botched robbery” either.

If you look at some of the events perpetrated by the Swamp Creatures in Washington that Trump wants to get rid of, over the years, you begin to see sort of a pattern to many of them. As the blogger I quoted earlier said; “Sound familiar?”

Segregated Integration

by Al Benson Jr.

Over fifty years ago this country was subjected to something called a “civil rights movement” supposedly because schools, restaurants and drinking fountains in the South were segregated. We were all dutifully informed by a compliant media that this was evil and “racist.”  Blacks and whites were not able to go to the same schools or use the same showers or whatever. The “civil rights movement” in our day has progressed to the point where boys calling themselves girls are now permitted in ladies bathrooms around the country. You can see we’ve come a long way–but in which direction? But back in the 1950s and 60s segregation was supposed to be evil and “racist” and so it had to be turned around, resisted, and gotten rid of, so we were told.

Having read a little about the “civil rights movement” over the years,  I was concerned that many of those involved seemed to spring almost unbidden from the far left part of the political spectrum, including many of the most well-known among them. Now, before the steam starts coming out of your ears, I am not saying that everyone in the civil rights movement was a communist (although it had its share). There were a lot of good people that got involved in it because of what they perceived as an injustice and who probably had no clue as to the leftward tilt of some of the leaders of the movement. And these good folks were used as window dressing to cover the activities of the more leftist-oriented in their ranks.

If you want a good expose’ of the civil rights movement, and one of the earliest, I would recommend a book by Alan Stang called It’s Very Simple–The true story of civil rights. Mr. Stang, now deceased, was an investigative reporter par excellence,  and dug into a  lot of stories over the years that most “investigative” reporters felt it was better, for the sake of their careers, to just leave alone. Alan’s book gives you some excellent observations on the civil rights movement and its leading luminaries . I believe it might still be available on Amazon.

Another good source is a book by Kent Steffgen called The Bondage of the Free–An examination of the civil rights movement. It was originally published in 1966 and reprinted in 2009 by The Institute for Southern Historical Review in Dahlonega, Georgia. You might try to see if it’s still available on Amazon. Both of these books give you a perspective on this movement you will never get on your evening newscast.

With the aid of the journalistic and political left the civil rights movement was finally able to get the courts and politicians to do away with segregation and integration became the law of the land, with open displays of black students being escorted to public schools to be integrated there by police, and we were treated to pictures of James Meredith being escorted to the University of Mississippi by the police, and the call was ever and anon for complete integration. Blacks were not supposed to be kept out of anyplace and whites were taught to be inclusive–or else!

So time has passed and we have now had several decades of forced integration where everybody gets thrown in with everybody else by federal edict. And at this point, if you are going to ask me if I have objections about sitting next to a black family in a restaurant, I don’t. I have had black friends over the years and, as Christians, we have often sat together and broke bread. But that has been our choice, not the government’s.

However, now that integration has been achieved, I have noticed a rather disturbing trend among many blacks, especially at the college level. Now that they have been thoroughly integrated into society, they have decided they are not sure that’s what they really want, they don’t seem to feel “safe” there, and so we are starting to see articles in the managed media about various colleges where blacks are demanding “no whites allowed space.” I guess you could call this segregated space away from white students. They wouldn’t use that term; they call it “safe” space, but what it amounts to, really, is segregated space.

An article I read on http://www.thecollegefix.com for January 6, 2016, written by Alec Dent–UNC Chapel Hill (North Carolina) said: “Black college students across the country have demanded that they be segregated from white peers,  calling for ‘safe spaces’ on campuses meant only for so-called students of color.” Some might look at that and consider it anti-white discrimination, but then, whites are the one group you can openly discriminate against and get away with it anymore. In fact it’s open season on them!

Demands for this sort of thing have been proliferating on campuses all across the country, with “local” university groups drawing up demands (many of which sound eerily similar to one another) “Underscoring that, students tend t hang out with similar students automatically…” Heavens to Abigail, some of us could have told them that fifty years ago when they were so busy trying to “integrate” all of us. They’ve finally discovered that amazing truth–and it only took them half a century! Man, that’s real progress! Maybe there’s hope for the “intellectuals” after all (but not much).

The article noted that this is going on at Oberlin College, at Scripps and Pomona colleges, and there have been others. One article I dug up mentioned the same thing at the University of Michigan. Another mentioned the University of Colorado at Boulder, and yet another mentioned American University. An article from http://www.frontpagemag.com for May 17, 2017, by Daniel Greenfield, noted that: “No whites allowed in college cafe due to black student demands.” Mr. Greenfield observed, quite astutely, that “Anti-racism is the new racism. Safe spaces are the new segregation.” He’s right on the money.

And so, the “civil rights movement”  has now “evolved” from integration with whites to reverse racism that excludes whites.

Knowing how these agendas from the left work, one can only wonder how long it will be before some brilliant leftist black professor in some college out on the Left Coast will “discover” that blacks and whites are not associating with one another as he would like and he will claim it’s all the fault of “white privilege” and so it will be time for a whole new “civil rights” crusade to begin.

Do you begin to get the feeling that we have all partaken of the scam before and in the next decade or so, we will be treated to a repeat performance?