Goodbye Internet

By Al Benson Jr.

For several months now I have been seeing tidbits on the Internet about internet regulation, a little something here and a little something there. Some articles have said it’s really bad and others have sought to paint it as the last best hope for man. When anything is supposed to be that “good” for us, I get suspicious. I begin to wonder who it will really be “good” for, us, the unwashed masses, or the One World elitists in Washington who claim they represent us. Usually it ends up being good for them and bad for us and Internet regulation, like Obamacare, is no exception to this rule.

Most of us realize that the Internet is the one remaining source of real information out there that the federal government has not, until now, been able to muzzle. I imagine there are countless thousands like me who get their news off the Internet rather than from the federally-approved and controlled “news” media.

I notice that, on the 26th of this month, the FCC will vote on implementing a new “net neutrality” regulation. That sounds so nice and “neutral” doesn’t it—no sides taken, just a nice neutral approach to all issues and questions, right? Folks, in all honesty, if the feds are running it you have to know it ain’t gonna work out that way. The real aim of this regulation is to neutralize all the information the feds don’t want on the Internet so it will be unavailable to the public.

And that’s not only my opinion. Author Fred Reed, http://www.fredoneverything.net has stated, quite accurately that: “Today the internet is the only free press we have, all that stands against total control of information. Consider how relentlessly the media impose political correctness, how the slightest offense to the protected groups—we all know who they are—or to sacred policies leads to firing of reporters and groveling by politicians. The wars are buried and serious criticism of Washington suppressed. That leaves the net, only the net, without which we would know nothing. Which is why it must and will be censored, sooner if Washington can get away with it and later if not…” Thanks to the Internet, ordinary folks have finally been able to learn how their benevolent government has been stiffing them for generations. Many are not real enchanted with what they have found out, which is one reason there is so much discontent across the country. People are sick and tired of government lies and the feds realize this so they need to devise a way to make sure the truth about their lies will be covered up as it was in the days before the Internet. So, in order to cover up their duplicity, truth will have to be regulated off the Internet—and this will apply to all areas of truth, from theological to historical to economic.

In an article on http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com for February 12th, 2015, Neil Stevens noted: “Critics who don’t want to debate the merits of expanded government like to portray the Net Neutrality debate as activists vs Cable Companies, but this isn’t that at all. This is the people vs. the Obama administration, as it is with EPA, NLRB, and every other overreaching regulator. Don’t take my word for it. (FCC) Commissioner Ajit Pai says ‘The American people are being misled about President Obama’s plan to regulate the Internet.’ He’s seen the plan, folks. He’s in a position to know who’s lying and who isn’t.” And on the same blog spot, for February 12th are comments by Judi McLeod. McLeod stated, quite forthrightly that “With public attention riveted on 50 Shades of Grey and NBC’s ‘lyin Brian’ Williams, the proletariat is about to lose its most reliable form of communication: the Internet…Big Government takeover of the Internet will become a fait accompli by February 26, 2015, with a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) vote. By the time the public becomes aware of it, the Internet will already belong to Obama. Suffering in silence with no means of communication to others is exactly what Obama wants on his mission for his ever-expanding Fundamental Transformation of the Free West…Community organizers running governments always hide their dirty tricks behind innocuous sounding names. ObamaCare was first the Affordable Health Care Act. Hijacking the information highway sounds so much less lethal when it’s introduced to the masses as ‘Net Neutrality’.”

Now, let me bring this a little closer to home for those with an interest in real history and Southern/Confederate history and heritage. “Net Neutrality” probably will mean that you can no longer use the Internet to discuss the real reasons for the War of Northern Aggression or to make the very real case for secession that needs to continue to be made in our day. Oh, you will still be able to talk about the War, who won which battles on which dates or which generals had tea and crumpets with General McClellan on July 5th, 1862, but anything meatier than this will probably be “neutralized” off the Internet and you will be reduced to trying to circulate your information via photocopied newsletters, the way many of us had to do it before the Internet came along. The Net Neutrality Act is truly a step backward—as it is intended to be. Socialist community organizers do, indeed, want to make sure their opposition has no voice on the Internet and their agenda is to silence their opposition almost to the point of non-existence. This is what it’s all about, folks, regardless of the lies you’ve been fed to the contrary. You may not see many more articles like this from me or anyone else once the Internet has been successfully “neutralized.” Maybe something for a little sober reflection.

Advertisements

Republicans (tweedle-dum) and Democrats (tweedle-dee)

by Al Benson Jr.
Back in 1968 when George Wallace ran for president on the American Independent Party ticket he made a statement that was so true it ought to be remembered. In commenting on the two major parties, Wallace said they were “Tweedle-dum and Tweedle-dee and there’s not a dime’s worth of difference between the two.” I have often wondered if Mr. Wallace knew just how right he really was.

There is no real, substantial difference between the two. Whatever differences there seem to be are shallow to say the least. Oh to be sure the rhetoric is different but it seems that no matter which party runs the federal government the agenda always seems to be the same and the results are the same—less liberty and less economic prosperity and the group presently at the helm shouts at us about how much better off we are with them than with the loyal opposition. It all sounds so canned anymore that I think both parties hire the same script writers, and they might as well, because both parties pursue the same agenda—forcing this country eventually to become part of a One World socialist government.

I watch some of this foolishness going on in both the regular “news” media and on the Internet. The polls abound—will Hillary beat Romney; will Rand Paul beat Hillary; will Huckabee do better than both of them? It’s all a charade, folks. It keeps you from doing any really serious thinking about what is happening to us and keeps you focused on the ephemeral stuff, the stuff that really makes no difference in the long run and so you never get to ask any serious questions about what really goes on—questions like “who really controls both political parties” and what is the agenda of those who control both political parties?

For instance, if I mentioned the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group, who among the public has ever even heard of these organizations? When was the last time your newspaper or the six o’clock news broadcast on the tube mentioned these groups and the influence they wield on both political parties? Can’t remember when? Neither can I. The fact is that these groups are our real “shadow government” in this country. These are the people that get to decide who runs for office and how the agenda is presented and what this country does in regard to our foreign affairs—the whole nine yards!

On July 18th of this year Pastor Chuck Baldwin had an article on http://libertycrier.com entitled The CFR Has Controlled Both Major Parties In Washington For Decades. You might think that some up and coming young journalist would love to sink his teeth into doing an article like that, but don’t hold your breath. It will never happen. The media people know all of this and they will never tell. And since so many of them are part and parcel of this, they figure you are better off not knowing about it. “He who knows nothing questions nothing (at least nothing worthwhile).”

Admiral Chester Ward, a former CFR member until he realized what the game was and got out, has written: “The most powerful clique in these elitist groups (such as CFR, Trilateral Commission, et al) have one objective in common—they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United States…The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence and submergence into an all-powerful one world government.”

Pastor Baldwin’s article gave a fair-sized list of some of the prominent CFR and Trilateral Commission members—people you’ve all heard of before but you’ve never been told what they are really all about. Some of the names on the list, and you can check them out for yourself, are: George Herbert Walker Bush, Bill Clinton, Sandra Day O’Connor, Dick Cheney, Colin Powell, Jesse Jackson, Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw, David Brinkley, Diane Sawyer, Barbara Walters, Cyrus Vance, Henry Kissinger, Alan Greenspan, Dianne Feinstein, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Chuck Hagel, John McCain, Jay Rockefeller, Fred Thompson, Richard Nixon, Hubert H. Humphrey, George McGovern, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Al Gore, John Kerry. This isn’t the whole list but it gives you and idea of the influence the CFR/Trilateral Commission cabal exerts on both political parties.

Pastor Baldwin has correctly noted that: “The globalists within the two major parties will do anything to make sure that a non-globalist is not elected President of the United States or given a too-powerful position of congressional leadership. Hence the GOP leadership is pouncing on Rand Paul early to try to kill any momentum he might garner going into the 2016 presidential race. Virtually everything the global elite plan to do hinges on America engaging in perpetual war. Perpetual war is the linchpin that holds the entire globalist agenda intact. Anyone who threatens that linchpin is declared an enemy by the establishment and is slated for political destruction.” This should be obvious. Look at what they did to Ron Paul in 2012 and if his son manages to have even half the perseverance in the direction of peace and truth that his dad did they will do the same to him in 2016, or thereafter if they have to. If he doesn’t realize that by now, it will dawn on him shortly. Any truly honest man need not apply for the position of President because if he does his own CFR-controlled party will make sure whoever runs in the “other party” gets the nod.

Back in 2006, Mordechai Zember did an article for http://www.newswithviews.com the title of which was Council on Foreign Relations Is An Elite Cabal. Should you wonder why you have never heard of these folks, Mr. Zember explains: “Of course, the people know almost nothing about the Council on Foreign Relations because many propagandists, I mean journalists, themselves are members of this elite organization.” And then he went on to list some of the same people that Pastor Baldwin mentioned. And he also said: “In fact the CFR owns and controls the television stations, radio stations, and newspapers such as ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, PBS, New York Times, Washington Post, Time, U.S.News & World Report, and Newsweek. Sadly, some of the Internet newssites ‘remain conspicuously silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their activities’.” He did mention the John Birch Society being one group that has spent considerable effort trying to expose the CFR for what it really is, but many other “conservative” groups just seem to ignore it and what it does. Makes you wonder just how “conservative” some of them really are.

The global elite also has a vested interest in making sure we elect ignorant people to Congress, people that have no real grasp of what they should be doing or what to look out for. I recently talked to a man here in Louisiana that chanced to have lunch with a Congressman from here in Louisiana. He asked the Congressman what he knew about the United Nations Agenda 21 program and its implications for this country. The Congressman had never even heard of Agenda 21 and knew nothing about it. Suffice it to say he should have. Needless to say I will look elsewhere when I cast my vote in November. Seeing that congressmen take an oath to preserve and protect the Constitution then they should be aware of those that are out to subvert the Constitution so they can resist all such efforts. If they are not even aware of our adversaries how can they protect us from anything? But, then, when it comes right down to it I suppose for most, just getting re-elected and staying on the gravy train is what’s really important. What these politicians fail to realize is that if the CFR and the other one world government groups have their way Congress will probably no longer be needed and there may no longer be a gravy train for them unless they are willing to sell their souls to the Devil—but then, maybe a lot of them have already done that.

If you ever get to go to a town meeting it might not hurt to ask your congressman what he knows about the CFR. How he answers that question may well determine if he is worth voting for again or if you should work for some other candidate.

I posted an article on 9/15 on http://thecopperhead.blogspot.com called “C’mon Joe, Wake Up and Smell the Coffee” that could easily have been a companion piece to this article as they both deal with the same situation, and in that article there are several books mentioned that you can read online if you are willing to educate yourself as to what is really going on and has been going on for decades now.

Chemical Weapons and Our Selective “News” Media

By Al Benson Jr.

This whole chemical weapons scenario in Syria is just one more case of our selective “news” media only sharing with the American people “all the news that fits the agenda.”

Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury as well as former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, wrote an article that was posted on http://www.lewrockwell.com on September 10th . In this article he asked, quite pointedly, “Why is the Obama Regime so desperate to commit a war crime despite the warnings delivered to the White House Fool two days ago by the most important countries in the world at the G20 Summit? What powerful interest is pushing the White House Fool to act outside of law, outside the will of the American people, outside the warnings of the world community?”

Mr. Roberts continued: “The Obama Regime has admitted, as UK Prime Minister David Cameron had to admit, that no one has any conclusive evidence that the Assad government in Syria used chemical weapons. Nevertheless, Obama has sent the despicable John Kerry out to convince the public and Congress on the basis of videos that Assad used chemical weapons ‘against his own people.’ What the videos show are dead and suffering people. The videos do not show who did it. The Obama Regime’s case is non-existent. It rests on nothing that indicates responsibility. The Obama Regime’s case is nothing but an unsubstantiated allegation. The world’s two worst liars, Obama and Kerry, say Assad did it, but they admit they cannot prove it…The lie serves their undeclared agenda.”

And Roberts noted that the Russian government “…has given evidence to the UN that conclusively proves that the al-Nusra, al-Qaeda affiliated invaders are responsible for the attack. There is also conclusive proof that the ‘rebels’ have chemical weapons” that were given to them by Saudi Arabia. And Roberts observed: “…who besides the White House Fool is so unbelievably stupid as to believe that Syria is a threat to world security?” And he tells us “Forget about the US media, which are nothing but a propaganda ministry for the Israel Lobby. What the members of Congress and what the American people need to ask Obama is why does the White House only represent the Israel Lobby? No one supports an attack on Syria but the Israel Lobby.” Mr. Roberts has made some pretty strong statements here, and, I believe, with some justification.

For a little background on this I would recommend The Lobby by Edward Tivnan, published by Simon and Schuster back in 1987 and Deliberate Deceptions–facing the facts about the U.S.-Israeli relationship by Paul Findley. These may be available on Amazon.com and they will give you some idea of Mr. Roberts rationale. I’ve got a couple others I could recommend but if you can get these two that will be a good start.

Also, Charleston Voice http://chasvoice.blogspot.com  posted an article on September 10th, which had an original dateline of August 28th. It stated, in part: “U.S. media suppressed 2009 UN report showing Israel using chemical weapons against Palestinians. Obama ignores Israel’s chemical weapons abuse while targeting Syrian government that may not be responsible for recent chemical attacks.” How typical for our “news” media which should just be renamed “the Ministry of Propaganda.” Real news has nothing to do with what they do. The Charleston Voice article continued: “Few major mainstream American news outlets exposed the sordid details of a 2009 United Nations (UN) fact finding report that revealed how Israel’s military illegally aimed chemical missiles at a United Nations Relief and Work Agency (UNRWA) for Palestinian refugees in a twenty-two day invasion of the Gaza Strip in 2008…As the US and world media watch to learn if claims that President Barack Obama will execute a military strike against Syria without a vote of Congress or the support of the UN, the same media outlets are burying that suggests preparations for war could be premature. Little media attention is being paid to claims from a UN commission that Syrian rebels, not government soldiers under President Bashar al-Assad’s control, were responsible for recent chemical weapons attacks that killed over 300 Syrians.”

Well of course the media’s paying no attention. Rebels with chemical weapons is not on the agenda while government troops using chemical weapons IS the agenda. There was also a Reuters report that stated “U.N. has testimony that Syrian rebels used sarin gas:..”

Charleston Voice noted the same thing. It said: “Did you know that the United Nations has had evidence that the Syrian rebels have been using sarin gas against Syrian government forces since May? This was reported by Reuters and other major news organizations around the world, but there has been almost a total blackout of this information by the big corporate news outlets in the United States. Why are they keeping this truth from us?” The article, written by Michael Snyder, noted that Syrian rebels have been caught red-handed with sarin gas in their possession.

So why isn’t the “news” media in this country letting us in on all this. Europeans find out. Americans don’t. I supposed it will be our boys that fight yet another no-win war for the benefit of the New World Order crowd and so we don’t need to know all this stuff ahead of time. Knowing ahead of time might give the anti-war folks a louder complaint and we can’t have that when there’s big bucks to be made, now, can we? And I suppose they will con the American Christians into buying into this by telling them we will fight to defend Israel—no matter what.

I have a novel thought here—let Israel defend herself for a change—especially after incidents like the USS Liberty back in the 1960s. You never heard of that? Get on the Internet and do some homework. Israel today is no different than any other secular humanist nation. Their people need the forgiveness that only Jesus Christ can give just like everyone everyplace else does. Nothing else will solve their problems—or ours either.