Biden Dare Not Antagonize The Chinese Communists (Because they own him!)

by Al Benson Jr.

I notice that the White (Red) House hasshut down the possibility of a cease fire in Ukraine not only once, but twice now. Obviously, the Biden war Machine wants this war to continue. Why is that? Well, there might be a couple reasons. One may be that the Ukraine war helps to keep the public’s mind off some of the Biden family’s shady deals. It gives them something else to occupy their minds.

Another reason might be that this country has not yet given Ukraine enough war material so that we have depleted our own supply of those materials yet. If and when we reach that point, we might then be open to Chinese aggression, so we must continue the war until we reach that point. I realize that may sound far out to some, but when you look at the record of the Biden family’s dealings with China, it’s not all that far out.

Congressional committees have now found eleven more instances of Biden family dealings with Communist China. In fact, China has made the Biden’s wealthy–so how dare the U.S. do anything that hurts China and benefits the U.S.! Biden can’t afford to let such happen lest his good buddies in Beijing get mad at him and cut off the financial faucet.

I noticed on this morning’s Fox News that there had been over a 900% increase in the number of illegal Chinese nationals that have been caught crossing our Southern border recently. What do you suppose these people are coming here for? I’ll wager it’s not to flee Communist oppression. More than likely it’s to promote Communist oppression in some form.

And then there’s all those drugs coming across our Southern border–alot of which come from China. It would be interesting to know of any connections between the Mexican drug cartels and Communist China. There have to be some.

Recently the Governor of South Dakota introduced a bill to curtail foreign (Chinese) purchases of land in that state. Her state legislature overrode her bill. Given the present political climate you have to wonder who in the South Dakota legislature is in favor of Chinese land investment in South Dakota. Obviously someone is. Why?

I’m afraid we have more than we should have in this country who are sellouts to Marxist aggression–or maybe they are people who are in favor of the Deep State and One World Government and they realize supporting Communist China may be the quickest way to get there at this point in history.

In his book Benedict Biden: Water Carrier For The New World Order Arthur R. Thompson observed that: “First of all, the Chinese are anticipating the next war using three new initiatives: cyberwar, outer space, and biological warfare. As to the latter, the Peoples Liberation Army of the Chinese Communist Party controls the lab in Wuhan, whence came the COVID 19 virus. This was well known to those who pay attention to such things, but was revealed only sparingly by a small part of the media and more than a year after the virus had spread. The significance of this future use of biological warfare by the PLA was even more rarely pointed out. Let us make the point again: the Chinese communist military controls the laboratory in Wuhan.”

All things being considered, it is not a real big leap to say we are already at war with Communist China–our leaders just have neglected to mention that to us thus far. And I understand that they are now finding Chinese ammunition on the battlefield in Ukraine, which means that China is already helping out Putin and we are only finding out about it just now. How long has this been going on and we didn’t know it? To say our “news” media has been derelict in its duty could be the understatement of the decade!

Advertisement

Neutralizing Christians!

by Al Benson Jr.

That old saying “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing” is more true today than at anytime in our history. And it seems that in the Christian Church (all denominations) we have more and more good men willing to do absolutely nothing at all to combat what is plainly evil.

Thee Christian Church has been mostly neutralized, starting with the Scofield Bible heresy and continuing on from there. There are a few good Christians here and there that still seek to combat evil, but bye and large, the Church as been put to sleep-and too many good men just don’t want to hear about anything “negative” or evil because if they knew some of what went on they might have to rise up and do something about it and that just takes too much effort that they no longer feel is worth the effort. They have been programmed to try to “snatch a few brands from the burning” and otherwise to let this world go to hell because it ain’t worth saving. Needless to say, I disagree with them, but that’s where many are and they’re not about to budge from that position. After all, the “rapture” is coming to take them out of this mess, so why bother!

I have known Christians that got ticked off at me because I pointed out some of the evil they did not care to be confronted with. I knew one man that, if I pointed out bad things going on he would say “I’m in complete agreement with you, but don’t you believe the Lord is in control?” The Lord being in control was his excuse for not doing anything about the evil .I have never felt the Lord wasn’t in control of it all, but I often feel that the Lord wants to control the evil through the efforts of His people–and too many of His people ain’t having any of that! No letters to the editor of a local paper or to your Congress critters about bad situations. Just not worth the effort!

Another man I knew never wanted to be told about anything “negative!” Everything always had to be “positive.” Sorry folks, but that’s not how the real world works–that’s the way a fairy tale world works! And while positive stuff is nice, you can’t just ignore the evil at work in the world and only focus on the positive.

Now admittedly, in my writing, I usually focus on lots of bad things that I have become aware of over the years. If I ignored the negatives and only accented the positives, I could not live with myself! I feel Scripture requires us to oppose evil that we might point to what the Lord expects us to do. Ignoring evil because we don’t want to have to deal with it doesn’t cut the mustard–anymore than leaving your kids in public school so they can be a “witness” to the system does! It’s a cop out! An excuse for not doing anything when we should be doing something .Not only have we become neutralized, we’ve become lazy! Neutrality (lukewarmness) has turned us into spiritual mugwumps–with our mugs on one side of the fence and our wumps planted firmly on the other side–good fence straddlers!

We should wonder how many of the ills in this country could be slowed down or even reversed if Christians just got off their couches of ease and got involved! How many “positive” things could be accomplished with more Christian input? I have a good friend up north who told me years ago that “Christians will flee responsibility like they would the plague.” I fear, at this point in history, he may be right!

Who Wants A War With Russia? Actually, Some Politicians Do!

by Al Benson Jr.

Who in their right mind wants to go to war with Russia? Most voters, conservative and otherwise, do not want a war with Russia because they realize their sons, fathers, and husbands will be the one who will have to fight that war, not the politicians who prattle about the need for it! I’ve said before that Lindsey Graham never saw a war he didn’t love! That being the case, the army should hand Lindsey an assault weapon and turn him loose on Russia!

According to some of the mainstream media pundits you are a Putin stooge if you do not wildly desire to fight the Russians in hand to hand combat. We’ve spent billions upon Billions on Ukraine’s defense. We are meeting all of Ukraine’s defense needs .What happens if the US needs some defense? It will probably not be there because Ukraine will have it all!

Everyone in Washington is focused on Ukraine while this country falls apart! The “news” media are telling you that you are a traitor if you refuse to endorse World War 3. The Washington insiders, the deep state, are pushing for war with Russia. Again, your sons and husbands will fight that war, not them .Having a few thousand Americans killed off will probably be their contribution to population control.

Maybe if the Biden Regime gets us in a war with Russia that will take people’s minds off the Biden family’s utter corruption. After all, that ploy worked for FDR. When his efforts to halt the depression flopped, he got us into World War 2–and people quit thinking about the depression. I know the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, but FDR knew that was coming and did nothing to stop it because the Japanese code about the attack had already been broken. So they knew–and did nothing to warn the commanders at Pearl Harbor. And FDR had his war!

And that grand fabricator and Biden stooge Mayorkas continues to insist that our Southern border is “secure,” Sure it is–but for who? They’ve just held hearings at the border which the Democrats boycotted. The chif of the Border Patrol said we do not have “operational control” of the border. That means the drug cartels have it.

Our enemies worldwide grow even more bold because they perceive that, not only is Biden totally compromised and corrupt, but he is a weak sister and has no stomach for defending his own country. And why should he? His task upon assuming the presidency was to finish what Obama started–the fundamental transformation of the US into a third world dictatorship. Obama didn’t finish that task–Biden is supposed to–and the deep state is supposed to give him aid and comfort while he does it! We have a batch of people in Washington and New York that make Benedict Arnold look like a choirboy!

“Moderate” Biden Has Always Been A Leftist

by Al Benson Jr.

Back before the 2020 excuse for an election, our excuse for a news media took great pains to Inform” us that, after the evil Trump was gone Biden would step forward as the voice of moderation. The evil Orange Man had committed two unpardonable sins–he had given us energy independence and he had made a valiant attempt to curb the illegal immigrant invasion with his border wall, which seemed to be working. For doing these and other “America first” endeavors he was labeled an instrument of Putin and he had to go.

Our excuse for a news media assured us that Biden would be a new voice of “moderation” and would return this country to a state of normalcy–normalcy being shutting down our oil and gas production and going back to getting all our oil and gas from our enemies and opening our Southern border wide to all comers from any and everywhere. They forgot to tell the public that this was what “normalcy” would be, but we should have been able to see that for ourselves. Thanks to our ability to think rationally having been mostly gutted by our public education system, we were not able to see what “normalcy” really entailed. All we were told is that evil Orange Man had to go, no matter what replaced him!

And what replaced him was a dedicated leftist who had been such at least since his late 20s. Interesting that while evil Trump was in office, we had no wars, but now, with the “sane” Biden in office, we have one in Ukraine, in which we are too heavily involved!

However, the truth of the matter is that Joe Biden is no more a voice of moderation than he is the man in the moon! Biden has always been a dedicated leftist, even way back when he first got into the Senate. Arthur Thompson’s latest book Benedict Biden–Water Carrier For The New World Order goes into great detail about Biden’s loving affinity for the New World Order, going all the way back into the early 1990s. Mr. Thompson, who also authored To The Victor Go The Myths And Monuments which I have quoted from extensively in the past, has noted of Biden that: “What he wanted as a young man he is now accomplishing as president” and he is doing that with the aid of a “news” media that has taken great pains to never expose his weaknesses and, “later on in his life, even protected him and his family from exposure, even when the evidence was before the public, the media and Biden’s opponents covered up the significance of his agenda,” What Mr. Thompson is saying here is that most of his opponents were not really all that opposed to his leftist agenda.

As for little talked about facts about Joe Biden, although he and his second wife were residents of Delaware, Mr. Thompson informs us that: “…they married in New York City, at the United Nations chapel. Then they honeymooned behind the Iron Curtain, in the communist Hungarian Peoples Republic, rather an odd place for a U.S. senator. Keep in mind that this was at the height of the Cold War with the USSR and its sattellites. Not a very ‘American’ thing to do-especially for a senator.”

Biden’s wife was a Presbyterian and he was Catholic. Why would they marry in a chapel that was home to all the world religions and claims they are all equal. I sure wouldn’t, and I doubt most of you all would either. What all this tells us is where the Bidens are really coming from. How many took note of that? All this says much about Biden’s faith and what his policies were as a junior senator.

For those interested in this latest book of Arthur Thompsons, I looked it up on the internet. The price, right now, is only $5.00. You can’t beat that for a book like this. To get it, contact the John Birch Society, 770 N. Westhill Blvd., Appleton, Wisconsin, 54914 http://www.JBS.org

UNESCO As A Tool Of Communism

by Al Benson Jr.

Back when I was 17 years old a group of us who had paper routes were taken on a trip to new York City. One of the stops on our itinerary was a visit to the UN building. We got the usual “Cook’s Tour” but I doubt if any of us thought much about what they told us at the time. I don’t know who planned all the places we went to, but someone had to and I have wondered, in retrospect, why they wanted us to see the UN building and be influenced by what we were told there.

At that point in my life I knew nothing about much of anything, but like most kids my age, thought I knew it all. It was to be another fourteen years before I started to find out what the United Nations was really all about and what I did find out was hardly reassuring.

The United Nations turned out to be nothing but a vehicle to promote the idea of one world government. In essence, it was a major step backward–all the way to the Tower of Babel as talked about in the Book of Genesis in the Bible. The Tower of Babel was man’s attempt to reach Heaven by his own efforts. The UN’s effort is to create, so they tell us, Heaven on earth, although they don’t believe in Heaven or in God, so their effort is man’s effort–and being that, it will ultimately fail, even though it will ultimately make many lives miserable in the process.

The communists have been quick to utilize the efforts of the UN because they see in it a tool they can use to promote one world government with themselves as the head of that government. In his book The Fearful Master G. Edward Griffin explained how UNESCO fit right in to the communist plan to influence education in America. The Communists long ago recognized what they had to do to take over in America. Griffin told us: “And in 1936, speaking before the ninth national convention of the Communist party in the United States, Earl Browder declared: ‘Who wins the youth, wins the future of America’.” And regarding UNESCO, Griffin informed us that: “As former Communist Joseph Z. Kornfeder expressed it: ‘UNESCO corresponds to the agitation and propaganda department in the Communist party. This department handles the strategy and method of getting at the public mind, young and old’…On August 2, 1953, Dr. Luther Evans, who was then the new director of UNESCO, inadvertantly confirmed the new Senate report when he declared that ‘the U.S. drive against Communist infiltration in UN groups was a factor threatening to destroy UNESCO.”

Griffin pointed out that many who supported and worked for UNESCO did so out of good motives, but then he noted: “It has always been the pattern of successful Communist operation to have unsuspecting idealists do most of the work while the Communists stay in the background pulling the strings and issuing the directives.” One of those unsuspecting idealists was a man named John Larson who found out when it came to UNESCO, he really had very little input. Eventually he woke up to the game and revealed: “With respect to UNESCO’s literature, it has very little substance and what it does have, appears overtly or covertly to be slanted away from the spiritual and political beliefs and traditions of the United States of America and toward the sterile conceptions of a nebulous one-world government or a federation which is to be built upon atheistic foundations…I found grave errors of omission and distortions of perspective with respect to historical trends and events and to the growth and development of certain ideas…The foundations of UNESCO are atheistic and materialistic. For it, man is the highest product of nature rather than one created in the image and likeness of God. This view of God and man dictates UNESCO’s methods and can be seen in them…UNESCO preys upon those with whom it comes in contact and is more than glad to assume covertly or overtly all responsibility.”

UNESCO issued a series of books called Toward World Understanding several years back. In Volume 5 it was stated: “The kindergarten or infant school has a significant part to play in the child’s education. Not only can it correct many of the errors of home training, but it can also prepare the child for…membership in the world society.” And Griffin has duly noted that: “Over the past twenty years the concept of education in America has gradually changed until today (and he wrote this in 1964) it is shockingly UNESCO-oriented. And this includes more than attitudes toward patriotism and religion. Increasing emphasis has been placed on such vagaries as ‘human adjustment,’ ‘group consciousness,’ and ‘social cooperation’.”

You should be able to see with all of this that it does not bode well at this late hour for American youth. Their attitudes and affections have been tampered with and this spiritual assault on them has taken place in public school classrooms and in some private schools as well. All the more reason to remove your kids from the public school classroom and either teach them at home or find a Christian school that reflects what you believe rather than what the world believes.

The United Nations Promotes One World Sustainable Religion

by Al Benson Jr.

In his book Freedom On The Alter the late William Norman Grigg went into the theological background of the United Nations. Yes, for those who don’t know, the UN does have a theological background, as do all organizations. Some will admit it, some won’t, but it’s there.

Mr. Grigg gave us some background. He wrote: “Referred to derisively as a “spiritual swap-meet’ by one commentator, the 1993 Parliament of World Religions was in some ways a homage to the first such event, which took place as an adjunct to the Columbian Exposition of 1893. According to The Quest, a quarterly journal published by the Theosophical Society, the 1993 Parliament has facilitated a ‘Theosophical revival’ in part because the event reminded religious scholars that the Theosophical Society had been a major participant in the first Parliament a hundred years before…”

Mr. Grigg told us: “The Theosophical Society was represented at the 1893 event by Annie Besant, who went on to become president of the society in 1905. Both of the Theosophical Society’s objectives–the drive for religious syncretism and the propagation of eastern mysticism–were served by the 1893 parliament. The event signaled the introduction into America of eastern religions such as Hinduism, which was represented by Swami Vivikenanda, a fellow traveler of Madame Blavatsky’s society.” This character promoted religious assimilation as the way to promote “tolerance” and he went on to condemn “fundamentalism” as the fountainhead of all the world’s misery. You can already see where those people were going. Just for the heck of it, look up Madame Blavatsky and Annie Besant on the internet.

Grigg continued: “In the late 1980s a small group of Vivikenanda’s followers in Illinois and Wisconsin began preparations for an event to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the Swami’s address. The leader of this group was a small, bespectacled man named Daniel Gomez-Ibanez, who is a trustee of the Millenium Institute, an Arlington, Virginia group that describes itself as ‘A non-profit organization promoting integrated global thinking.’ On January 25, 1993, Gomez-Ibaniz joined a colorful collection of religious leaders around the ‘Peace Alter’ at the UN’s Temple of Understanding to inaugurate the ‘Year of Inter-Religious Cooperation and Understanding.”

And now, we come to “sustainable development” which is currently “in vogue among globalists and environmentalists. ‘sustainability is measured by an individual’s or an institution’s willingness to submit to a global government.” Gerald Barney, a former director of the national program for the Rockefeller Brothers Fund has told the religious leaders at the Religious Parliament to “make your religious traditions sustainable.”

That raises the question–what happens to religions that refuse to conform to the United Nations sustainability agenda? Mr. Grigg told us that, according to Barney “Christianity is not a sustainable faith ‘as it is understood and practiced now.’ Furthermore, he condemned ‘religious exceptionalism’ which is essentially the monotheistic belief in a universal, omniscient God. What is required of the world’s religious leaders, asserted Barney, is a ‘reinterpretation and even (a) rejection of ancient traditions and assumptions.”

In other words, to be acceptable to the United Nations, Christians must be prepared to jettison their belief in the Holy Scripture and the God of Holy Scripture. That’s what they are asking for. I can’t think of a better reason for this country to get out of the United Nations than this. Christians should not throw away their faith to embrace UN “truth” rather they should reaffirm their faith in the Triune God of Scripture and tell the UN to go back to its father the devil.

What Communism Is And Isn’t

by Al Benson Jr.
Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Too many Christians have swallowed the fantasy that communism is nothing more than one more political philosophy. As such they have been led to believe that it is “of this world” and therefore they need have nothing whatever to do with anything concerning it which includes being in opposition to it. They have been taught that we should be “so heavenly minded that we should be no earthly good.” Unfortunately, most have willingly complied–therefore they are waiting to be taken out of this life so they don’t have to do anything about the mess we currently live in. It’s lots easier that way–no responsibility to try to make things any better or to change the culture around them–just coast along and let the Lord do it all. To their chagrin they will find out it doesn’t work that way, even though that is what the notes in their Scofield Bibles advocate.

In this instance they could take a lesson from Whittaker Chambers, a former Communist who broke with the Communist Party and embraced the Catholic faith. Chambers wrote the monumental book Witness in which he told about his years as a Communist as well as exposing many he knew in the Communist Party, including Alger Hiss, first Secretary-General of the United Nations.

Chambers explained communism in a way many Christians in our day would probably not be able to grasp. He stated: “First, let me try to say what Communism is not. It is not simply a vicious plot hatched by wicked men in a sub-cellar. It is not just the writings of Marx and Lenin, dialectical materialism, the Politburo, the labor theory of value, the theory of the general strike, the Red Army, secret police, labor camps, underground conspiracy, the dictatorship of the proletariat, the technique of the coup d’etat. It is not even those chanting, banered millions that stream periodically, like disorganized armies, through the heart of the world’s capitals…These are the expressions of Communism, but they are not what Communism is about.”

He continued: “Communists are that part of mankind which has recoverd the power to live or die–to beat witness–for its faith…It is not new. It is, in fact, man’s second oldest faith. Its promise was whispered in the first days of the Creation under the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil: ‘Ye shall be as gods.’ It is the great alternative faith of mankind…Other ages have had great visions. They have always been different versions of the same vision: the vision of God and man’s relationship to God. The Communist vision is the vision of Man without God. It is the vision of man’s mind displacing God as the creative intelligence of the world.”

In other words, communism is the religion of man, without God there to get in his way and to prevent him from doing all he wants to do to gain power over the lives of others–all others! Chambers understood the true theological nature of communism, an anti-God, anti-Christ religion that manifests itself in the political realm but is every bit as theological as it is political. Would to God more Christians had the ability to figure this out.

Witness was originally printed in 1952 but it was reprinted in 1985. You might want to check out amazon.com and see if the 1985 version is still available. It was reprinted by Regnery Gateway Inc. It is a big book. Over 700 pages, so it will take you awhile to read it. In going over my notes in the book I noted that I had read most of it twice before, back a few years, but you can always learn more from a good book by the rereading of it.

Chambers names names and gives you a good running history of Communist activity in this country in the 1930s-40s, especially around Washington.

It finally dawned on Chambers that communism was both wrong and evil. He broke with it because he became convinced it was the right thing to do. Interestingly, when he broke with communism he felt he was leaving the winning side and going over to the losing side–but he still felt it was right, no matter the personal results to him.

I can remember, years ago, I talked to a man in the church we attended at that time, in Indiana. I explained to him my reasons for opposing communism. To which he replied “You are going to lose. You know that don’t you?” I thought that was a surprising comment for a Christian to make, but, in light of where much of the Church is at in our day, I don’t suppose it was atypical. I can remember replying to him that “In the final analysis it isn’t important who wins and who loses. Doing the right thing is what counts.” With a little more wisdom now, I can certify that, in the long run, the communist will not win. He may prevail in the short term, but the Lord will have the final say. He may use His people to have that say–and to do that He may even use some of them in the political realm. Maybe that is an idea more Christians should start getting used to, even though, at this point they shrink from that thought.

If the Lord’s people refuse to confront that which is evil, He may end up finding others who will be more willing to tackle what is evil and to expose it.

Marxist Religion And Its Infiltration Into Our Institutions

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Herbert A. Philbrick, in his penetrating book I Led Three Lives made a number of astute observations that it would behoove us to give some consideration to in our day.

He told us, for instance, by asking a question, when he said: “What was it that instilled such devotion into these Communists, to labor so hard for such a distorted cause. What was it that got into them? Was it sincere belief in the prattle of communism? Was it disillusionment and frustration that led them into these paths?” Actually what had gotten into them was a religious faith, though most of them would not have labeled it as that. It was a theological premise that Karl Marx was some sort of secular deity, possessed of the wisdom to right all the wrongs in the world.

Philbrick also told us, of public schools, that “The subject of Communism was seldom discussed, much less studied, in public school…I could not recall having seen a single textbook on the subject of communism. (Even today, very few public schools provide either courses or textbooks on communism.” The few books I had come across in the public library appeared to be mostly by apologists for communism; Walter Duranty (of the New York Times), Corliss Lamont; millionaire son of the multi-millionaire Thomas Lamont; or Rev. Hewlett Johnson, a clergyman high in the Church of England.” Lots of information in these few comments. Public schools of that era taught nothing about communism (not entirely an accident). I can remember, when I was in the sixth grade in public school, there were several books in the school library that gave glowing reports about the United Nations, which was fairly new at that time. It was presented as the last, best hope for mankind–something that has turned out to be a hollow shibboleth.

Public schools in our day seem to have reversed the non-teaching about Marxism or communism. We are now graduating students from them that prattle about how wonderful some sort of communism would be for our country and how “racist” and capitalist this country is and capitalism is listed as the cause of racism, so the two are intertwined with each other.

Note his comments about public libraries. No books in them except for those that apologized for communism. Makes you wonder who was running the libraries doesn’t it. It’s a little bit better in some instances today but you still have to be discerning about what you pull off the shelves to read on the subject of communism.

And after the kiddies get through their latest exercises on the class struggle in high school there is college. Philbrick mentioned a particular person in this regard and I will quote him. He said: “The young woman with the red hair was Dr. Hulda McGarvey. I had previously encountered Hulda in connection with the Sam Adams School for Social Studies, and regarded her as one of many misguided liberals enticed into teaching posts in the Communist-front training school. But I was shocked to see her here in the inner circle of the Communist party. A graduate of Smith College and Columbia University, a former instructor at Mount Holyoke College, and an assistant professor of psychology at Smith, she was a highly regarded academician, unknown for any intimate Communist party connections.” How many other professors in our day are like this woman? Although nowadays professors mostly don’t trouble to hide their Marxist proclivities.

I can remember, a few years after my high school years, a man in the church we attended at that time did not want his son to be taught by one of the English teachers I had had in high school. He was in the Air Force Reserve and had somewhere gotten the info that this teacher was a Communist and refused to have her teach his son. I can’t verify his concerns. This was all over 50 years ago now, but I recall he was quite vehement about this situation, and let’s just say it wouldn’t surprise me. Philbrick mentioned, on page 224 of his book “…a teachers’ (Communist) cell in the public schools,…”

Believe it or not, even the Unitarians came in for “honorable” mention in Philbrick’s book. He mentioned, on pages 71, 132, and 239 various Unitarians that were more than willing to aid the Communists in their endeavors.

Philbrick also mentioned, on page 155, Louis Budenz, who had been the managing director of the Communist Daily Worker newspaper. In 1945 Budenz broke with the Communists and returned to his Catholic faith, somewhat of a shock for the comrades at the time. Years later, I got to know a man who had talked with Budenz after he broke with the Communists and apparently Budenz gave him quite a bit of information as to how the Communists operated at that time.

But, to close this out, one more observation regarding Marxist theology–in regard to the indoctrination given to potential Marxists, Philbrick told us that: “Marxism teaches them to resign themselves to the collective future, to give up the shaping of their own personal destinies, and to accept the alleged inflexible laws of class warfare and ultimate victory for the proletariat. They can simply let themselves go and be carried along to a goal they think they cannot escape.” You can see where such a mindset can become a theological belief. And it is no different today. The belief in violent communist revolution in our day is still a theology. Maybe one of the questions we need to address today is–who is the devil using to direct this theology and how much are they spending to promote it?

“William Tecumseh” Brennan And the Current Civil War

via “William Tecumseh” Brennan And the Current Civil War

Free Muslim Immigration into Europe–the Barcelona Declaration of 1995

by Al Benson Jr

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Maybe I am just dense, but until I got an email from a friend up in Missouri, I had never even heard of this, or if I did it was so long ago I had totally forgotten it. It just goes to show you that the Internationalists, the One World Government crowd, is always at work 24/7 to force their agenda on people who just want to be left alone. However, unpleasant as it is for us. we have got to wake up and realize that the One World Government crowd is never going to let us or anyone else alone.

They have a Luciferian agenda to remake the entire world over into the image of their deity.  The fact that Genesis 3 tells them this will never happen matters not at all to them as their apostles continue to “prowl about as roaring lions seeking whom they may devour.” And one way they seek to devour is through ethnic and cultural genocide.

I came across a site called http://balder.org/euromed-en and the article I found was titled: Free Muslim Immigration to Europe 2. It wasn’t long but it had to do with “secretive European Union-agreements with 10 European and North African countries” and it said “The Euro Mediterranean Declaration was agreed upon by the EU, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey and Israel and comprises:  Comprehensive political partnership, among other things about:: establishing a free trade area and economic integration to begin in the year 2010,…Cultural partnership. The EU offers the populations of 9 Muslim Countries  free movement of goods, services, capital and people into the EU.”

The “Cultural Policy” in all this “must avoid the  popular distinction between ‘them’ and ‘us’…The Danish Foreign Ministry is educating us from our ‘stereotypes and prejudices’ towards Islamic culture.’ Naturally UNESCO is one of the groups involved in this propaganda campaign.

A brief comments about this turned up on http://www.abovetopsecret,com  that said “It seemingly explains the influx of Muslim immigrants into Europe, once again without mandate, it enforces multiculturalism in Europe…with financial reward to participating nations. There are many links on the subject, many citing it as a massive failure.”

Another one I came across is https://www.liveleak.com/  No date on this one but it has  posted two videos. I tried the first one and it was not available so I went to the second one and was able to pull it up. The title was The Barcelona Declaration/ Why Multiculturalism Has Failed in the EU. The man had somewhat of an accent, which doesn’t help with my hearing problem, but he gave a pretty fair explanation of much of what has happened in Europe.

My friend in Missouri gave a rather penetrating analysis of this and he connected some dots that many would not have noticed. I think he is right on the money! He said, in part, “The time of the Barcelona Declaration (1995) roughly corresponds with the beginning of the more widespread attacks on the Confederate Flag. At the time several of us were pointing out that the Flag attack was part of a larger plan that had to do with state and regional sovereignty. A resurgent South was just not part of the globalist plan. Little did I know that the Barcelona Dec was the blueprint for that plan. The Barcelona Declaration began implementation in 2010 of the beginning of  the ‘migrant’ crisis…It is similar to the ‘Open Borders’ policy promoted in the US. It started in Europe but is now in the US and the heart of the globalist plan.”

His insightful comments prove that the last place you go to for “news” is the news media because what they fail to tell you is usually  more important than the bovine fertilizer they spread in front of you as “breaking news.”