FBI Now Has “Grave Concerns” Over Memo

by Al Benson Jr.

When I read this brief article on http://www.newser.com my first reaction was “What a surprise!”

Of course they have “grave concerns” about it. It will expose many in leadership positions in the FBI as willing participants in Hillary’s “Keep Trump from being president campaign” and they are not especially enthralled about the public being aware of this.

FBI Director Wray and his henchman, Rod Rosenstein, really don’t want this stuff getting out to the public at large because it will expose how thoroughly politicized the FBI and the “JustUs Department” have really become under Comrade Obama and we “deplorables” just don’t need to know this. Supposedly Wray as shocked when he first read the memo and it led to his asking Assistant Director Andrew McCabe to step down and resign early. I wonder if poor Andy will get his full pension, seeing he didn’t make it all the way to the end of March. Judge Janeanne on Fox News commented on this and said she felt Wray really knew about all this a lot earlier and just sat on it until it got to where he couldn’t do that any longer. I would tend to agree with her.

Wray and Rod Rosenstein, his anti-Trump henchman, don’t want this released, possibly because Rosenstein is mentioned in it in an unfavorable light and as he is the one that picked Mueller to investigate Trump’s fake Russian collusion he ain’t looking too great right about now. Further exposure would not enhance his reputation and so we have here what I believe is one last, grand attempt to keep the public from really finding out what some of these political scumbags in Washington have been trying to do to Trump and, by extention, doing to the rest of us.

The Demoncrats say this memo “cherry picks” the information and it will cast doubt on Mueller’s “investigation.” I have news for them. Mueller’s “investigation” (witch hunt would be a better description) has already become so blatantly obvious to most folks that it doesn’t need this memo to make it look bad. It reeks on its own, memo or no memo!

As is usual a few people commented on this article, down at the bottom, underneath it. The first comment was “What’s the FBI trying to hide from the public?” I answered that one myself. My thought was “Everything they can!”

Judas Bannon, Hillary’s House Fire, and Deep State Deception

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Well, we have rocketed into the new year, with weather cold enough to freeze the ears off a brass monkey and growing paranoia amongst the ranks of the Swamp Dwellers in Sodom on the Potomac.

The news today is that the Justice Department may be reopening the case of Hillary’s missing emails (maybe all 33,000 of them). The denizens of the Deep State don’t necessarily want that kind of information floating around out there–unless they are planning on throwing Hillary under the bus, which case might be determined by how much dirt she has on some of them. And let’s face it, over the years the Clintons have amassed a pretty hefty body count!

So, how to distract the general public, us “deplorables, from exercising  too much curiosity in this area. Well, how about the latest Judas, Steve Bannon, all of a sudden deciding that Trump’s son, Donald Jr., committed treason when he met with that female Russian lawyer for a whole ten minutes back in the summer?  That should do it, right? Bannon’s comments were made in a book whose author has been known to stretch the truth somewhat in some instances. Yet you have to wonder, in this case, because Bannon has yet to deny what this guy wrote. If it were inaccurate all Bannon would have to do is say as much–and he hasn’t. So you have to wonder. Bannon’s protestations about how much he loves the president somehow are not quite enough in this instance. However, Bannon’s treachery here gives the deplorables something to drool over instead of Hillary’s missing emails or the Clinton Foundation

Then there is the situation of the “fire” at the Clintons New York home, and some enquiring minds might be tempted to ask just what was destroyed in that fire. Chris Menahan wrote an article that appeared on The Hill which asked the question “Did Hillary Clinton’s Chappaqua house catch fire because she was burning evidence” or something to that effect? We’ll never know, of course,  but it’s interesting that is happened just now, with all of Hillary’s other problems.

An article on http://www.infowars.com for January 4th noted: “Republicans on key congressional committees  say they have uncovered new irregularities and contradictions inside the FBI’s probe of Hillary Clinton’s emails.” Remember, this was the FBI under that paragon of virtue, James Comey, who, it turns out had already written Hillary’s exoneration letter in this shoddy matter before he even interviewed her. I wonder, do you call that prescience or what? The article continued: “For the first time, investigators say they have secured written evidence that some laws were broken when the former Secretary of State and her top aides transmitted classified information through her insecure private email server, lawmakers and investigators told The Hill.”

And, just for good measure, the Deep State denizens are out probably in the dark of night, floating that old canard about how Mr. Trump is reacting to questions about his mental fitness. If you follow this stuff, you will remember that they started pushing this stuff back in March of last year, but it didn’t seem to be going anywhere, and so they sort of laid it aside for possible future use. Well, “back to the future.”

Trump’s White House secretary,  who seems to be a pretty level-headed lady, said of all this: “It’s disgraceful and laughable. If he was unfit, he probably wouldn’t be sitting there, wouldn’t  have defeated the most qualified group of candidates the Republican Party has even seen.” And she went on to note Trump’s accomplishments (which are notable) in his first year in office.

But, you see, don’t you, that we have to have this cacophony of supposed Trump failures thrown in our faces at this time because  all this is supposed to detract from any “news” coverage the prostitute press is forced to put out there dealing with the reopening of the Hillary email case.

In regard to Judas Bannon in this situation, I think someone made him and offer he couldn’t refuse–and he jumped!

Trump Gone By Christmas?

by Al Benson Jr.

Back in July the Democrats (with subtle Republican help) pushed a bill to remove Trump from office by use of the 25th Amendment. It didn’t float back then, but the Deep State is nothing if not persistent when it comes to carrying out its agenda to Make America Last. So they are considering another go at it. Recently we had a Democratic (socialist?) congressman introduce a bill to impeach Trump. Naturally at this point it failed, and I think he realized it would, but the plan was to get the idea out there in front of people so when it came up again, (as it will) people would have been conditioned to the idea.

Now there is all manner of stuff on the internet this evening about how the Deep State has planned to make sure Trump is out of office by Christmas. These people are cultural Marxists. They don’t quit until their objective is obtained–something those on our side have not even begun to grasp yet.

Lots of people think, with the Republicans in the majority in Congress, this would never happen. Don’t be too sure. Just because someone wears the label of “Republican” doesn’t mean for a New York minute that he is not part of the Deep State or a raving liberal, or worse yet, a quiet, subtle liberal who hates what Trump has been doing and wants desperately to put it all back to where it would have been if Hillary had been elected.

The real name of the game is to get Trump out of office any way they have to so they can begin to dismantle all he has done and give back to us the socialist garbage Obama left us with. To them that would be Nirvana.

One of those who wants Trump gone noted, awhile back, that “This is a president who seems increasingly at odds with everyone and everything around him.” The reason for that might just be that Trump is beginning to realize that those he has surrounded himself with do not have his best interests at heart, nor do they have the best interests of the country and its people at heart.

You only have a week now until Christmas. So keep your eye on what happens in Washington in that week.

The Deep State is working on a coup that will remove your president and his agenda and will put you back into the hands of Hillary and her handlers.

For all his faults, Trump has a vision that will help ordinary Americans to build better lives for themselves and their families. The Deep State does not want you to have that!  They want you under their thumb–or their jackboot, whichever they can reach you with first!

Ultimately, their war is not with Trump–it is with you (and me).

“Sovereign” States or Federal Satrapies?

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

There was an article on the Zero Hedge website back on last June 27th, written by Michael Snyder, which had originally appeared on the Economic Collapse blog. It was about how much land the federal government “owns” in our Western states. From the looks of the map that appeared with the article they “own” almost half ot it. The article noted that: “Today, the feds control approximately  640 million acres of land, and after decades of very poor management, many are calling on the states to take a larger role. This is particularly true in the 11 western states where the federal government collectively  owns 47 percent of all the land.”

Yep, you read that figure right–47 percent of it all. For instance, in Nevada, the feds “own” 84% of all the land in the state.  That leaves 16% of the state for ordinary folks. The feds “own” 64% of Utah, 61% of both Idaho and Alaska and 52% of Oregon. By the time you get to Wyoming the feds only “own” a measly 48% of the state. What a comedown from Nevada that must be for them!

I have to ask the question–does the public, ordinary folks, only owning 16% of the state they live in really constitute it being a “sovereign” state, or is it still really a federal territory that has been labeled a state for the sake of convenience (and electoral votes)?

Another pertinent question might be, which is more important–who “owns” it or who controls it? If the general public “owns” it  but can’t do much with it, then the federal government that controls  it is the actual de facto owner, isn’t it? It’s somewhat akin to the situation with the property tax that I have written about before on several occasions. You “own” your house and possess a deed with your name on it saying you own it. Yet, if you fail to pay the yearly governmental rent then some unit of government can come and take “your” property and do what they will with it. So, in the long run, who is the real owner–the man with his name on the deed–or the governmental agency that can take it away from him if he doesn’t pay their yearly “rent?” Mostly, we don’t want to think about this kind of thing. We should.

There was an article in the New York Times for August 25th of this year about Trump’a new Secretary of the Interior proposing shrinking of four national monuments in the West–so designated by King Barack the First (and hopefully the last). One of these was the Bears Ears, over west of Blanding, Utah. You can find it on your road atlas. Obama created a national monument there that was 1.35 million acres in size–land locked up so the public could do nothing with it.  Mr. Zinke, Trump’s Secretary of the Interior wants to reduce the Bears Ears monument to 160,000 acres. I hope he makes it, but even 160,000 acres is a lot for a monument with the Bears Ears as its centerpiece.  It’s pretty country there. We’ve been through some of it several times over the years, but it doesn’t rate another 160,000 closed-down acres for a national monument. Cutting it in half and designating half of it for a monument at the Bears Ears would be plenty, but then that wouldn’t give the feds control over all the 1.35 million acres–and control is what they really want. Control in the name of creating new “public’ monuments and “recreation areas” where you can only go if you follow their rules.

The owner of Land & Livestock international (look it up on the internet) has observed that “Transferring these lands to the States would be a great improvement, but would not necessarily be the best ultimate end…These lands need to be returned to their rightful owners (and/or their heirs and assigns)–the families who have 4 or 5 generations of sweat equity in the lands (or those who have rightfully purchased those property rights through  voluntary exchange). I am hopeful but I doubt seriously that we will ever see it happen.”

In the case of some of that “public” land near the Bundy Ranch in Nevada, one might be led to question just how much of this “public” land has been of use to Harry Reid and his son, or to Hillary with her Uranium One deal. Lots of big bucks being made there off some of that land that, we the public, supposedly own.

Well, Did He Or Didn’t He?

by Al Benson Jr.

Last evening I read an article on InfoWars.com that stated that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had recused himself from having anything to do with Hillary’s Uranium One scandal or the investigation of it. Needless to say, such information was distressing. And it made me wonder where Mr. Sessions was really at. Seemed like he was sitting out just about every issue that would help Donald Trump and expose Hillary.

Not having a naturally suspicious mind, I did not conclude that he had been bought off, or that his family had been threatened, or that Hillary had something on him he was afraid would come out. None of these scenarios  occurred to me primarily and I only list them here to let my readers know I did not consider any of these possibilities.

But, as of last evening, the info was that Sessions was backing out of the line of Democratic fire.

So, today I did a little scratching around. I found that Sean Hannity, on Fox News stated that Mr. Sessions had not recused himself from investigating the Uranium One scandal. Several other sources said the same thing, but then, some other sources also said that he had done this, so it was a mixed bag. And interviews that Sessions has given in the past few weeks have been evasive at best. The best you can get for the “will he or won’t he” question seems to be a qualified ‘maybe.” To those of us concerned about this issue that doesn’t seem to be an awful lot of help.

Now if he is planning on appointing a special counsel (which he should) to look into this, then I can understand his tendency to be vague about it in public. If he’s not going to do anything, (and up to this point he hasn’t done much) than I can also see him not wanting to admit to one of the three non-possibilities that I mentioned reluctantly above.

So it’s a big question mark–will he or won’t he? If he won’t then might I suggest that his days as attorney general ought to be numbered? And Mr. Trump ought to get someone in there that will do the job. The people harassing Trump over the Russian Collusion Delusion have all been associated with Hillary’s Uranium one deal with Putin, so them even being involved with that is a definite conflict of interest with what they are now doing. They are deflecting any real concern over what Hillary and Company did with Uranium One off onto the phony rabbit trail of Trump’s Russian collusion. And please don’t think this isn’t on purpose. If they focus all the attention on Trump and what he is supposed to have done, they deflect any information about Hillary and Company off onto the sidelines, and hopefully, into obscurity. And the prostitute press is more than happy to help them with that.

The Deep State, partly comprised of Hillary and her friends, may just be on the verge of being exposed–something they are trying to fend off as they would the plague. So stay tuned. The next few weeks could be interesting. They will either prove that Jeff Sessions will stand up and do what he should or they will prove that, for whatever reason, he is “just another one of the boys.”

Hillary–The Consummate Cultural Marxist

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

One of the hallmarks of the cultural Marxist mentality is that they continually point the accusatory finger at others and vilify them for doing the exact same things the cultural Marxists do. While this might seem contradictory to some who fail to grasp the cultural Marxist mindset, it really isn’t. You see, the cultural Marxist feels that it is perfectly okay for him, or her, to lie, cheat, steal and do all manner of things normal people would consider wrong because the cultural Marxist is doing all the wrong things for the right reasons. Hence, for them, there is no wrong in doing these misdeeds. Such reprehensible activity is only wrong when the rest of us do it. However, for the cultural Marxist to do such things to further his agenda is perfectly permissible. Doesn’t this explain Hillary and her husband, Bill, to a tee?

Following the news this week, we have finally seen, as I wrote in my most recent article, that “the worm has turned.” Congress is finally getting around to asking questions about Hillary, Podesta, the Russian uranium deal and all that is involved with it. It took them long enough, but I guess we have to be satisfied with “better late than never.” Waiting for Jeff Sessions to do some of this would have been akin to waiting for hell to freeze over–and that would only happen if the Clintons stood to make money out of the event.

Just yesterday morning I read an article by Tyler Durden on Zero Hedge that detailed some of Hillary’s reaction to the truth finally starting to come out about her and her sleazy friends and their “business” dealings and the “charitable” Clinton Foundation. If you want to read a really good book about this get hold of Peter Schweizer’s book Clinton Cash published by HarperCollins. Mr. Schweizer tells you where all the skeletons are hidden in the Clinton closet. Mr. Durden noted that “As demands intensify for the DOJ to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate whether the Clintons were involved in a quid-pro-quo surrounding the controversial Uranium One Deal–where the former Secretary of State voted to approve a deal that ceded 20% of American uranium reserves to a Russian company–Hillary Clinton is finding that she can no longer ignore the burgeoning scandal.” So what’s her response to the truth?

Why she says it’s all a pack of lies, that it was all debunked long, long ago. She claims “It’s the same baloney they’ve been peddling for years, and there’s no credible evidence by anyone.” Sorry Hillary, but that ain’t quite true and, truthfully, you realize that. And more Americans are now coming to realize it, too. People are beginning to wake up to the fact that the Clintons actually lie to them. What a shock! So to fight back against the truth, Hillary now claims that the Trump administration “…are experts at distraction and diversion.” Actually, it’s Hillary and company that are the experts at distraction. She’s been doing it for decades–the Trump people are just now learning. Some of the most damning evidence comes from articles recently posted on The Hill, hardly a publication noted for its right-wing proclivities.

An article on newsmax for October 19th observed that President Trump “blasted” the “news” media for failing to cover the Hillary/Russian uranium deal. In fact, Mr. Trump tweeted that “Uranium deal to Russia, with Clinton help and Obama Administration knowledge, is the biggest story that Fake Media doesn’t want to follow!” He’s right on the money there. He is starting to realize that the “news” media gets paid to cover up the real news, not to report it.

Newsmax also stated that the FBI had an “eyewitness account” of Russians having sent millions of dollars to “help” President Bill Clinton’s “charitable” foundation–and all this dinero supposedly arrived at just the same time that Ms. Clinton was on the government panel that approved the sale of our uranium to Moscow. Heavens, what a coincidence! Yet Hillary claims all this has been debunked. She and her husband have such a record of subterfuge how can you believe anything they say? Yet, as cultural Marxists, none of this really matters to them. If they lied, why they did it for the “right” reasons and so that exonerates them. So what you and I would go to jail for they feel they should be granted a free pass for. Ain’t double standards wonderful–for the Deep State folks?

And does anyone remember that fake dossier about Trump and the prostitutes that was so famously circulated around awhile back? According to http://dailycaller.com writer Chuck Ross “The Hillary Cliton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid opposition research firm Fusion GPS to investigate Donald Trump as part of a project that led to the infamous dossier compiled by a former British spy.” (which turned out to be a big fake). And the person who originally floated this fake trial balloon to Clinton and the DNC was “A Republican donor who was vehemently opposed to Trump’s candidacy…The surprise revelation that the Clinton campaign and DNC were directly connected to the dossier is sure to provide fodder for Republicans in Congress.” Well, for some Republicans, anyway.

So, do you wonder why the Great Swamp needs to be drained? With creatures like “Hill and Bill” swimming around in its murky depths, it’s just not safe for normal human beings.

And then you have to wonder (and this thought has been voiced) if the truth gets so potent that it can no longer be hidden, will those that currently finance “Hill and Bill” and Obama begin to feel that their overall agenda would be better served if they ended up throwing this unholy trinity under the bus to save their own skins? That’s a thought that “Hill, Bill” and Obama really ought to consider.

Open Letter to President Donald Trump

Dear Mr. Trump,

You may well be already aware of what I am going to say here, but I felt the need to say it anyway. Lest it come across to you in the wrong manner, let me state that my wife and I both voted for you, and we pray for you, that what you are trying to do will be successful. There are people in your own administration that cannot honestly say that much.

Regarding this entire “Russian collusion” narrative you have asked several good questions which I need to comment briefly on. It should be obvious to you that Mr. Mueller, in some vain attempt to tie you to something illegal or treasonous, will investigate you, your family, your friends, including all the family pets (to see if you ever owned a Russian wolfhound) back for at least three generations, and no matter how tenuous whatever they manage to dig up is, it will be parroted by the mainstream media as a world crime of gigantic proportions. I think we both realize that.

You asked a good question in one of your tweets–“What about all the Clinton ties to Russia, including Podesta Company, Uranium deal, Russian Reset, big dollar speeches” (given by William Jefferson Clinton?) In any honest investigation of Russian connections all of this would be included in the investigation along with whatever you are accused of. But I think we both realize that what you have aptly termed a “witch hunt” is not an honest investigation. It is exactly what you said it was–a witch hunt!

That being the case, any questions about Hillary’s ties to Putin, or what Podesta did, or the Clinton uranium deal with the Russians, or Bill’s big dollar speech in Moscow are simply not on the agenda and never will be on the agenda. Indeed, if anything, the current fuss over your “Russian collusion” is little more than an excuse to cover up whatever has occurred  between Hillary, Bill, Podesta, and the Russians, because all those connections are most definitely not to be dealt with. So if you are looking for an answer to your very legitimate questions in their area, you may get one by the twelfth of never, but not before!

The entire “investigative” agenda here is to get rid of you and render your administration helpless to change the direction the Deep State (Swamp) and its Fake News appendages have been going in for decades. That’s what all of this is really all about.

Your administration has to be destabilized because you are tearing down what these people have spent decades constructing–a globalist, one world government, with themselves as the god/rulers of that government. In order for them to complete their task, you have to go, and the legitimate wishes and desires of the American people have to go too. After all, we are just a batch of “deplorables.” Ask Hillary!

Might I be so bold to suggest that, if your America First agenda is to have any chance of success–these people who get their jollies out of tormenting you and your family–all have to go. And you have to work at legally dispensing with them.

Many evangelical pastors have come and prayed with you. That’s good. You will need God’s wisdom to know how He would have you do what I think we both realize you need to do.

I won’t take up anymore of your time. Thank you for reading this, and may God bless your efforts to do what is right for America.

Sincerely,

Al Benson Jr.

https://revisedhistory.wordpress.com