Multiple Shooters And A Cover-up In Vegas

by Al Benson Jr.

Member Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

You ignorant, racist, hate-filled “deplorables,” what has gone down in Vegas is supposed to show you what you get for not having the good sense to vote for Hillary in the last election. This is partial payback for your denying Hillary the office she was so plainly entitled to and would have had if you all hadn’t messed it all up for her by voting for that horrible Trump!  And to get back at you, Hillary, with the willing aid of Paul Ryan and the “usual suspects” in the Republican Party, will be coming for your guns–one new regulation at a time!

Trump may be pro-Second Amendment, but with all the battles he is being forced to fight on all fronts, from the Russian “collusion delusion” on down, his Second Amendment stand will be superfluous.  Las Vegas, at one level (there are other levels) is a sneak preview of what “those people” in Washington and other places would dearly love to do to you, and will, if given enough time.

Yesterday, October 4th, on Zero Hedge, there was an article by Michael Snyder from The Economic Collapse Blog. Mr. Snyder asked 16 questions about the Vegas shooting that the prostitute press aka the Mainstream Media would rather not see dealt with. I can’t go into all of them here, but some were really good so I will touch on them. I would urge you to check out The Economic Collapse Blog.

Question 2 of the 16:  Were their additional shooters? Yes, there were, it seems, more than one and there was also shooting at another hotel about a mile away, the Bellagio Hotel. So the shooters were not all at the Mandalay Bay. From what I heard, the shooting at the Bellagio was stopped rather quickly. It seems the security folks or whoever there were on the job and they squelched the shooting in about a minute and a half.

Question 5 of 16: How in the world did Paddock get 42 guns and several thousand rounds of ammunition into his hotel room, supposedly without anyone noticing? That’s one I asked myself, given the amount of video coverage that hotels and casinos usually have, especially in a place like Vegas. Almost makes you wonder, with all those guns, if he wasn’t carrying on some sort of gun running business. And who would all those guns have been for–Islamic terrorist groups possibly? It’s known that Paddock had a ton of Antifa stuff in his room. Even the Sheriff’s Department there has had to admit that.

Question 6 of 16: “How did someone with ‘no military background’ and that wasn’t a ‘gun guy at all’ operate such advanced weapons?” An article from Natural News made this point–“…these are not systems any Joe off the street can just pick up and use to effortlessly mow down 500 people. Running these systems requires extensive training, experience and stamina.” And the answer to that is that he didn’t do it all. He had help, and not all even in the hotel he was in.

Question 7 of 16:  Why was there a woman out in the audience at the music festival telling people they were going to die in 45 minutes? Actually it has been reported on InfoWars.com that there were both a man and a woman doing the same thing. What did they know? Obviously more than the audience!

Question 8 of 16: “Why did it take law enforcement authorities 72 minutes to get into Stephen Paddock’s hotel room?”

Question 15 of 16: “Why were nearly all the exits out of the concert venue completely blocked?”

And Question 16 of 16: Why was a country music festival chosen as the target?  Was the goal to kill as many Trump supporters and other conservatives as possible?…” That was part of it, that and to prepare the rubes in flyover country for another all out assault on their Second Amendment rights. They were supposed to feel “guilty” over being white and being gun owners and be made ready to, again, sit on “stools of everlasting repentance” just like the Establishment Radicals did to Southerners at the end of the War of Northern Aggression.

Gary North, as usual, asks a few penetrating questions about this that should be addressed. On GaryNorth.com for October 5th, he asks “Do the rounds that killed and wounded all those people match the weapons in the shooter’s motel room. Are there any rounds that do not match, indicating more than one shooter?” If some of these guns were to be passed along to someone else then he wouldn’t need to know how to use them all, would he? All he’d need to know how to use would be the few he might do some shooting with.

Several people have asked questions that I checked out today. Why didn’t alarms sound when the shooter(s) broke the hotel windows? Seeing those windows broken out should have given some indication as to where the shooter(s) were. And where have all the bullet casings from all that shooting gone? Has anyone picked them up to see what caliber the weapons are?

Another item from InfoWars. com was an article noting that Paddock had a guest in his room at least one day when he ordered breakfast. They had a picture of the receipt for breakfast for two, which listed “occupant and guest” on it. So who was the “guest?”  Lots of inquiring minds would really like to know. So why do I get the feeling that, unless these facts become so glaring that they can’t be swept under the rug, no one is going to deal with any of this?

It has been noted that heavy gambling is one way of “laundering” crooked money and getting it out into the system. Is that what Paddock was engaged in with all the gambling he was doing? Do any of these big hotels and casinos have Islamic or Leftist connections?

News broadcaster David Knight noted today on his newscast that we will now be getting “death by a thousand cuts” in regard to gun control. They will now start trying to dismantle the Second Amendment, one little regulation at a time until they have accomplished what Obama was trying to do while he was in office and couldn’t quite bring it off?  Hillary was then supposed to complete the job. How ironic now that, if this happens, it may be during a Republican administration. If Trump is going to stop this he will have to start vetoing any of this legislation that comes down the pike–and rest assured it will come!  Because if the truth were known, many so-called Republicans want it every bit as much as the socialist Democrats do. The only difference between most of these socialists is the party label. So there is a lot going on with Vegas and, as usual, the Leftists plan on getting two or three things done with one action.

Advertisements

Lots Of Questions About Las Vegas

by Al Benson Jr.

It seems as if there are more questions about the horrible terrorist attack in Las Vegas than there are answers. The Leftist politicians and media have again raised the howl for more gun control, as though that would have prevented this situation. It wouldn’t. Stop and do a little checking about some of the recent false flag events that have taken place in this country and see how many of the people that supposedly did the shooting (most of them dead now) obtained the weapons the supposedly used legally. The majority got them legally or someone else got them legally for them.

So the Leftist hue and cry for more gun control is nothing more than the usual Leftist attempt to gut the Second Amendment in any way they can and they are politicizing this event to promote their agenda. They should be thoroughly disgusted with themselves, but being cultural Marxists, they are not. The end justifies whatever means they use. I hope the president stands firm on the Second Amendment and does not emotionally cave in to their Leftist hysterics because, for them, it’s all an act, a sham, to promote taking down the Second Amendment. They all have bodyguards, with guns, but they don’t want ordinary, honest folks to have guns because they might actually shoot, in self defense, some of the Left’s Antifa or Black Lives Matter buddies and that would really be a tragedy, wouldn’t it? For them it is a tragedy if ordinary folks have the means to defend themselves. That’s a no no!

Lots of questions about this supposed shooter. Supposedly they found Antifa literature in his hotel room, along with an arsenal of firearms. You have to wonder how this man got all those guns up to his room on the 32nd floor. It must have been quite a chore–and no one saw him toting all this in. And we are talking about long guns here, not pistols that you might carry in a suitcase or a shoulder holster.

It is said he had cameras set up to film him shooting down at all those people and even had cameras set up in the hallway of the hotel so he could see if the cops were going to interrupt him. Did he have the expertise to set up all this equipment and make sure it worked? Or did he have help?

The shooter and his girlfriend seem to have Islamic connections and ISIS has claimed responsibility for the attack. Of course you have to realize this is not Islamic terrorism. It reality it’s, well, it’s Islamic terrorism. Sort of like “when is an investigation not an investigation, but only a ‘matter’?” You know what I mean.

Here, if you follow all that is going on, you have a case of Muslim terrorists uniting with the Left in this country and elsewhere, and in this country, a main part of that agenda is the destruction of the Second Amendment. Please keep that in mind, because that is what a lot of this is all about. It’s a replay, on steroids, of many of the false flags that happened during the days of the Obama Regime where, after almost every shooting somewhere the scripted call for more and more gun control always seemed to emerge out of the chaos.

I watched an interesting video tonight (10/3) in which the action seemed to show that the shooting did not come from way up on the 32nd floor, where you could see no gun flashes coming from, but rather way down at almost ground level, where you could see gun flashes coming from and hear the weapons going off every time you saw the flashes. From the video, it looked like that might indicate more than one shooter. But, we are not supposed to talk about that, or even think about it–thought-crime, you know! Just forget I mentioned it.

Antifa has threatened civil war by November 4th this year. And considering this month is the 100th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution they may try to celebrate that in this country with a 21st century version of Red October.

Just a little something to reflect on in your more serious moments.

“Cump” Sherman–A Yankee/Marxist Prototype of the cultural Marxist

by Al Benson Jr.

Anyone who has read any amount of the material I have written, either in my newsletter The Copperhead Chronicle or in articles on the Internet,  knows that I have employed the term Yankee/Marxist on more than one occasion. One of my readers, one time, asked me if using the term Yankee/Marxist wasn’t redundant. He had a point. However, my use of the term, redundant though it may be, is to amplify in people’s minds the truth that the Yankee, for the most part, has a Marxist worldview. He mostly has no use for the God of the Bible, whose Son and Holy Spirit he would vociferously deny, and he has no use for the concept of private property (except his own) and his agenda during the War of Northern Aggression was always “steal all you can carry off and destroy the rest. I suppose it needs to be stated here that by the term “Yankee” I am not referring to all Northerners, of which, though I have a Confederate ancestor, I am one.

The Yankee/Marxist’s was to “free the slaves” was a noble-sounding rationale and cover for his rape and pillage of the South, on several different levels, and his main effort was to make sure that his “god” in Washington (the federal government)  was forever worshiped and bowed down to. His cultural Marxist progeny today will even admit this if you pay strict attention to what they say.  One of the more well-known among them, Newt Gingrich, recently made a statement on television in which he said: “We fought a civil war to establish one sovereignty, the U.S. government.” Well, so much for “freeing the slaves” right? That was a good cover story, but Mr. Gingrich slipped up when he told the truth here–and tell the truth he did!

The Yankee/Marxist simply could not abide freedom and liberty for anyone. Everyone needed to be totally regulated and constantly supervised–for his own good naturally. He had an overriding compulsion to control people’s lives and make them do what he felt was the right thing–even if they did not feel like doing what he thought was right and proper, why then, he’d work to pass a law that made people do what he wanted. After all, he knew best. His cultural Marxist children still do the same thing today. Obama Care is a prime example and firearms registration (and eventual confiscation) is yet another.

That William Tecumseh Sherman shared this worldview can be seen from many of his comments over the years. In his book Citizen Sherman Michael Fellman has duly noted Sherman’s propensity toward military dictatorship on pages 80, 87, 131, 147, and 184.

Presently, I am in the midst of reading an interesting book by Winston Groom called Vicksburg 1863 in which Mr. Groom details all that went on in the Yankee attempt(s) to capture Vicksburg during the War. It was quite an extensive operation that lasted over a year  and went into several attempts by various methods, to take the city (all of which failed) until the final siege of the city ended it all. Sherman figured prominently in some of these efforts.

In discussing Southerners and their resistance to Northern “benevolence” Sherman said: “This is a larger class than most men supposed and they are the most dangerous set of men this war has turned loose upon the world. They are splendid riders, first-rate shots, and utterly reckless. These men must all be killed or (imprisoned) by use before we can hope for peace.” A quote from page 34. You will note that Sherman’s “final solution” to dealing with anyone that did not conform to his will was extermination. He took the same tack with the Indians in the West after the War was over (if they don’t do what we want then kill ’em all). Ol’ Cump Sherman was a real humanitarian–in the same mode as Joseph Stalin–who may have learned some lessons from Sherman.

It bothered Sherman that, when the Yankees took Memphis, most folks there were not real happy at his arrival in their fair city. If they expressed that in any tangible way, he retaliated,  gentle soul that he was. Mr. Groom noted: “First he threatened to close any church–and this included virtually all of them–whose minister or priest refused to offer a Sunday prayer to the president of the United States, whom they reviled. Next he began expelling from their homes the wives and families of rebel soldiers and sympathizers in reprisal for Confederates shooting at Union gunboats operating on the Mississippi…On September 24th he ordered the town of Randolph, Tennessee burned to the ground in retaliation for people firing on U.S. vessels and also, for the same reason, commanded the immolation of all homes, farms and outbuildings for fifteen miles down the Arkansas side of the river opposite Memphis.” And Mr. Groom noted, in this context, “These seem to be the earliest of Sherman’s pyromaniacal  urges in connection with Southern civilians and their property, but by a long shot they were not his last.” This quote from page 182. It almost seems like an understatement!

After reading some of the other things Sherman did during the War, I seriously wonder if he wasn’t a closet pyromaniac and the War gave him an opportunity to flaunt his aberrant behavior that he had not had previously–and after all, it was only Southern private property, along with war material, that he destroyed, and only Southerners that he turned out to starve and freeze when his bummers burned everything they couldn’t carry away. No problem there, right?  Naturally the authors of what passes for our “history” books don’t feel anyone really needs to know all this, so they just leave most of it out, except for a vague reference here or there, the same way they leave out all the information about all the Marxists in Lincoln’s armies, and in the Republican Party. Nothing to see here folks, just move along, and don’t look too close!

So Sherman may not have been, technically speaking, a cultural Marxist.Most of those we refer to as cultural Marxists did not enter the picture until the early 1900s with the advent of the Frankfurt School, as we have noted in other articles, but Sherman was most definitely a Yankee/Marxist and they can rationally be considered as the 19th century prototype for the cultural Marxists that were to follow them.

The aim of the cultural Marxists is to water down and ultimately destroy Christianity and to rid the world of that horrible curse known as Western Civilization, which has its base in Christianity. This is one reason the cultural Marxists never quit. Their agenda calls for the destruction of the Christian faith and its Triune God and replacing the Trinity with their own “god,” a collectivist, centralized tyranny that they call the “revolution of the proletariat.”  And lest you think this is a new struggle within the past 100 years or so, or even back as far as the French Revolution, this struggle goes all the way back to Genesis 3 in the Holy Bible.

Reprinted from The Copperhead Chronicle,  fourth quarter, 2016

Was the Malheur Wildlife Refuge Incident a Federal Sting Operation?

by Al Benson Jr.

For a change this has been a good week. Given our culturally Marxist regime in Washington and the wannabees in most of our state capitals, us ordinary folks don’t experience many good weeks anymore. So we should be thankful to the Lord when He gives us one.

To start off, in a typically culturally Marxist move in Fredericksburg, Virginia, the usual culture destroyers were at it again (they never stop). A local college sociology professor and some of his students wanted to get the City Council of Fredericksburg to rename Jefferson Davis Highway there because, after all, Davis was a slaveowner. They got one  city councilman to propose a motion on that, but the effort rather fell apart when they couldn’t even get a second for the motion from anyone else on the City Council. And so, Jeff Davis Highway in Fredericksburg remains Jeff Davis Highway–at least until the next attempt to change it comes along, or until after the election.

And in the same vein, for whatever reason, the FBI has decided to reopen the Hillary email case they had blandly smoothed over last July when the recommended no indictment for Hillary.  That was expected. This wasn’t. Something happened, somehow, to make the FBI think they had to revisit this, with only 12 days until the election. Who knows what indigestion rumbles around in the bowels of the Establishment, but something happened to force them to reopen this can of political worms. Was it Wikileaks? Proof that the Lord does answer prayer. We will see what He will allow to happen in this situation.

But the one that really caught my attention, probably because I have spent time in the West and followed the Sagebrush Rebellion over the years, was the result of the trial of the folks in Portland, Oregon known as “the Malheur 7.” Two of these seven were Ammon and Ryan Bundy, whose family I wrote about in several articles on this blog back in April of 2014 during the Bundy Ranch standoff. Check my articles on this blog for April of 2014. There are ten of them, all about the Bundy Ranch situation in Nevada.

The Malheur 7 have been on trial in Portland, Oregon for their occupation of the Malheur Wildlife Refuge near Burns, Oregon. This was the tragic situation that resulted in the FBI gunning down Lavoy Finnicum at a roadblock while he was on his way to a peaceful meeting. They claimed he pulled a gun–so they shot him nine times. See the article on this blog for January 31, 2016. Personally, from what I have read about Mr. Finnicum and seen in the videos he has made, you will pardon me if I find the FBI’s account of this rather dubious. These are the same people who shot Randy Weaver’s wife in the head while she stood holding a child in her arms at Ruby Ridge in Idaho. Anyone remember Ruby Ridge? It really must have taken a brave man to shoot a woman holding a child. I understand he got a medal for that–so you will understand why I have some reservations as to their sterling qualities.

The court trial in Portland in which the Bundys were tried, along with five others,was, in my opinion, payback for the Bundy Ranch situation over two years ago.

Almost no one who followed this trial, from what I have read, expected anything other than a guilty verdict. As I have read about the occupation of the wildlife refuge on and off over the months, I was convinced that this was one situation the Bundys and their friends should have passed up. The adverse publicity they got from this was designed to portray them as the devil incarnate, given what the “news” media does to those who stand on patriotic principles.

The “Just Us” Department alleged some things during the trial they presented no evidence for, and their contention that the Bundys and the others were terrorizing the people who worked there seemed to have no basis in fact, but with the Feds, such is no surprise.

An article on http://www.lewrockwell.com for October 28th, by Roger I. Roots, noted the following: “The U S Justice Department alleged in Count 1 that the seven defendants (and many others) had engaged in an ‘armed standoff’ at the federal wildlife refuge with the intent of scaring away the various government employees who normally work there. Every defendant was utterly innocent of this allegation…In fact, Ammon Bundy and the other defendants took a monumental (and quite daring) stand for the plain text of the Constitution when they occupied the Malheur Refuge in January of this year. They pointed to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the U S Constitution which seems to plainly forbid the federal government from owning land inside the states unless the states agree to sell such real estate to the federal government.  Needless to say, the present reality in the American west is in sharp contrast to this piece of the constitutional text. The feds claim to own and control millions of acres of land in the western states–most of which (such as the Malheur Refuge area) was never purchased from state legislatures or anyone else.” So where do the feds get the authority to do all this? Why they just assume it–because no one else has the power to refuse their “requests.” So whatever you think of the Constitution (and many of us are not totally enthralled with it) the Bundys felt they had a clear and consistent understanding of what it said and that’s what they operated on.

However, the thing that made me wonder if this whole thing was, indeed, a federal sting operation, was what Mr. Roots said toward the end of his article. He stated that: “Most startling of all were the undercover government informants that were revealed in the trial. After weeks of wrangling and arguing with defense lawyers, the Justice Department finally stipulated that at least nine undercover informants were planted among the Refuge occupiers. Thus, informants outnumbered the defendants on trial. One informant was even a bodyguard for Ammon Bundy and drove him to his arrest. Another informant admitted he trained occupiers in shooting and combat skills.” In my opinion when you have more informants than defendants, something doesn’t smell right. And when you have one of the informants training the occupiers in shooting skills and combat techniques it definitely doesn’t smell right–in fact it stinks outright! At what point did these informants become involved? Were they there at the beginning? Did they have a part in the planning of this operation?

I don’t know all the facts in this case, but I wonder who got the Bundys involved in it to begin with–and were the people that got them into it among the informants? If so, then this constitutes what we call a sting operation–getting someone to take part in something “illegal” they ordinarily wouldn’t have done unless you conned them into it and then you busted them for doing what you had conned them into.

It appears, though, that the jury in this case saw through all the federal chicanery because it acquitted all seven defendants, much to the pleasant surprise of many of us and to the chagrin of those in the Federal Establishment, who, I am sure, will now seek to find some other way to punish these folks for daring to defend their rights.

If Hillary Wins the Ethnic Cleansing WILL Continue (and “Reconstruction” WILL be ongoing)

by Al Benson Jr.

As we draw closer to the cooler weather of Autumn in the year of our Lord 2016, many think, especially in the South, that they and their heritage have survived yet another “long hot Summer” and now that it’s over they can go back to sleep for the Winter. This is a serious delusion for them to labor under–because it is as false as Hillary’s campaign rhetoric about her deep respect for the Second Amendment.

The ethnic cleansing campaign of the cultural Marxist Leftists has not abated, nor with the current “election” (selection) coming up, will it. If (some folks say “when”) Hillary “wins” the election, by hook or by crook (probably mostly by crook)  you will see another strong thrust in the “reconstruction” agenda, probably one of the strongest you have seen since Obama’s first year, back when he promised to “fundamentally transform” the United States. Has it ever occurred to anyone that what Obama was talking about was yet another phase of “reconstruction?” And because he and Hillary, in spite of all the huggy-kissy  stuff the “news” media spins out there for you on TV, really hate each others guts, she will try to outdo what he did so she can claim she had to finish what he started. You see, even though many on the Left loathe each other,  they are willing to work together to cut our throats, culturally and otherwise, while we on the Right prefer to fight with one another over jots and tittles rather than engaging those who would purge our culture from the face of the earth. As perverse as they are, the Leftists know how to work together when it is necessary. We have not begun to figure that out yet, much less attempt it. And in the mix we have many “Republicans,” so called, who, in spite of their conservative rhetoric, work to make sure we never do figure it out.

There was an article on http://www.wnd.com on the 20th of last May, written by Curtis Ellis, called The Radical Left’s Ethnic Cleansing Of America.  Mr. Ellis informed us that Hillary and Obama try to make us believe the disappearing jobs in this country are something that is inevitable in “the new global economy.” Donald Trump doesn’t buy that pile of cow chips and neither do I.

Mr. Ellis observed, and quite accurately I believe, that, “…the radical left planned the liquidation of white, blue collar working families…in order to ‘fundamentally transform’ America. The decimation of America’s middle class and industrial strength is a case of murder, not accidental death. It was done with premeditation, malice and forethought. The latest evidence comes from Thomas Frank, a man of the left and former Wall Street Journal columnist. His new book, Listen Liberal, exposes how the radical left, the Clinton family and Wall Street deliberately liquidated the white working class of America.”

One of the first ways they did this was to infiltrate the labor unions, purging men who actually worked for a living from influential positions and replacing them with “upper middle class activists…” They did the same thing in the Democratic Party until it represented only the far left.

And, of course, to make this really successful, you had to do it in the South, and the South already had a mostly Christian foundation that those people hated with a purple passion. A few psy-ops operations down here using “useful idiots” waving Confederate flags worked wonders when the media spun it the right way. The situation in Charleston, South Carolina in June of 2015 was a prime example.

Wesley Pruden wrote an article for http://www.washingtontimes.com back on June 25th, 2015 in which he noted: “This fit of ethnic cleansing was inevitable, given the popularity of getting ourselves politically correct, which has grown from a cottage industry, employing mostly family and intimate friends, to a great industry embracing the likes of Amazon, Wal-Mart and eBay…What started with palpitations and occasional fainting spells at the sight of a Confederate flag, has become a nationwide search for something, anything, to bring on a cleansing fit of hysterics.” When Rush Limbaugh said, at that point, that what had happened to the Confederate flag would eventually happen to the US flag everyone snickered. Now I don’t always agree with Rush Limbaugh, but in this instance, he was right on the money. Since his comments we have seen the cultural Marxists go after the US flag, the Gadsden flag, even the original Betsy Ross flag– all because they were all “racist” or “non-inclusive” or for whatever lame-brained reason they could conjure up at the time. But, for whatever reason, they all have to go. And Western culture and civilization also has to go. White culture must go–to be replaced with black culture, brown culture, purple culture with green spots, or whatever “culture” is deemed the best qualified to replace white culture–immediately if not sooner!

In the course of all this, Mr. Pruden brought up an interesting point. He observed that, as long as “racist” flags and monuments have to go–what about the Lincoln Memorial? He noted that “Honest” Abe “described himself as a white supremacist in language a Klansman could admire.” And if you think that statement is untrue, then you need to read The Lincoln/Douglas Debates. I assure you that Mr. Pruden knows whereof he speaks.

If you are naive enough to think the cultural Marxists have forgotten about you or don’t care what you do or say, then read an article by Kristinn Taylor on http://www.thegatewaypundit.com for July 7th of 2015, where she quotes an article from Politico Magazine by contributing editor Michael Lind.  Lind’s article describes the South as “Jesusland” and it states that the South “keeps the US down by its faith in God…” That should show you where the mindset of this publication is at. Politico whines about the fact that “conservative, religious white Southerners” are stopping the US  from “being more like Britain, Canada, and other liberal, English speaking democracies.” And Taylor observes: “The article concludes with the hope that the South will be ethnically and culturally cleansed by immigrants from other countries and liberals relocating from other parts of the US.” From that one statement alone do you begin to understand the Obama/Clinton/One World Government agenda for first your Southland and then for the rest of the country. While you sit bemused with your reality shows the Leftists are working at ways to do you  and your grandchildren in. Is that getting through to you yet??? They couldn’t say it any plainer!

So if (when) Hillary ascends to the regal throne in Washington, you can bet that “reconstruction” that never really ended, will be ongoing, because all of us nasty white Christian Southerners have to be expunged from this part of the country, and eventually from the rest as well–but first the South, then the West, and all the rest will fall into line after that.

One final thought occurs to me. If you want to work to forestall or prevent this, find yourself a good conservative Christian Church–one that advocates families having lots and lots of kids. The culture you save with lots of offspring, Christian-educated offspring, just may be your own.

How About a Little Damage Control?

by Al Benson Jr.

Last week the Democratic Party  was supposedly in a shambles. The web site http://thehornnews.com had an article posted for August 2nd that said, in part, “The Democratic Party is in the middle of a leadership purge that could affect the landscape of the 2016 election. Three more top Democratic Party officials have resigned today in the wake of an embarrassing email hack.”

Ahh, but that was then and this is now.

The Democrats looked pathetically bad, with party officials being thrown under the bus with amazing regularity.

On the same say all this was happening there was also an article on http://www.1776coalition.com by Gabrielle Levy which had Trump saying “I’m afraid the election’s going to be rigged, I have to be honest,…” In light of the Clintons’ reputation I didn’t think that was an outlandish statement, but apparently the Republican Establishment did because on the Horn News for August 3rd appeared an article which was headlined “Traitors! RNC pushing Trump to quit.” This article said, again in part, “The report, from an anonymous GOP source, stated that senior party insiders are so upset and baffled by Trump’s erratic behavior that they are preparing a back-up plan for replacing him on the ballot before the November general election.” Almost sounds like something they’ve had in play for awhile.

So, in two days, we have gone from a Democratic Party in shambles over all of Hillary’s leaded emails to the Republican Establishment planning to replace Trump because of “erratic” behavior. At least this is what the “news” media is telling up. Of course how much actual truth you ever get from them is always up for grabs, but looking at this entire scenario and taking it from Democratic ruin on Monday to Trump’s possible mental condition on Wednesday, it begins to smell to me like good old fashioned damage control for Hillary. They needed something to take the spotlight off of her and to focus it somewhere else so people would, in a few days, forget all about her email indiscretions and have something else to chatter about. And in typical Marxist fashion, if they can pull this off, they will kill two birds with one stone–bury Hillary’s email problems and cut Trump’s political throat all in one fell swoop! And the prostitute press are more than willing accomplices.

Unfortunately, so is the Republican National Committee–but then, if the truth be known, they always have been. Trump was not supposed to win the nomination. One of the other 16 political shills running against him was, and the Republicans weren’t too fussy which one, although they’d rather have had a Bush or a Romney than a Rand Paul, but they’d have lived with a Rand Paul if necessary. No way can they co-exist with Trump and they have been looking for some way, any way, to deep six him since long before the Republican convention. All you have to do to realize this is to have followed their actions and comments and you could have told that the real agenda has always been “anyone but Trump.”

Just because he won the nomination didn’t change their Marxist mindsets–and please, don’t try to tell me all the Republicans are conservatives. Some are, but not many. When you talk like a conservative but vote like a Marxist, then you’re a Marxist, possibly different from the Democratic Marxists only in degree and false rhetoric.

It’s like I have said so many times before–the same leftist Council on Foreign Relations/Trilateral Commission clique in Washington and New York controls both parties at the leadership levels.  The only question we might ask, in light of recent articles  I’ve done, is who controls the CFR and the Trilateralists?  As high up as they are, they ain’t at the top of the totem pole.

So watch what goes on in the next few days. Hillary’s email problems will probably be ancient history and the Republican Establishment will attempt to find a way to replace Trump with yet another political stooge who will make sure it’s business as usual–and that Hillary wins. That’s the real name of the game.

So what will all the folks that voted for and supported Trump end up doing when they find they have no real voice at all as all this goes down?  Probably not as much as we could hope for.

“Civil Rights” Morphs Into Anti-White Discrimination And “Transgender” Rights–Part Two

by Al Benson Jr.

As previously stated the “Civil Rights Movement” was mostly not the noble crusade it has been painted as by a compliant “news” media. If anything it was an exercise in class struggle and a vehicle to feather certain political nests over on the far left. In his book It’s Very Simple–The True Story of Civil Rights author and investigative reporter Alan Stang noted, on page 97, that: “…There are in the United States two kinds of ‘Negro Leaders’: the violents and the ”. non-violents. The violents want to destroy the United States and set up their own nation on part of it. All the non-violents want is integration. Americans of all colors are going to get one or the other, they are told,  so they’d better take the integration. If they don’t, they’ll get the self-determination, and that’s bound to be unpleasant. In other words, if the violents make a riot, and the non-violent Rev. Galamison doesn’t get what he wants,  the violents will probably make a bigger riot. If you wanted to define it in one word you’d pick the word ‘entortion’.” That’s what a lot of the “Civil Rights” Movement was built on. This is not new. The same principle was used in the labor union movement. So most people, in an attempt to do the right and peaceful thing, picked integration. Has that choice solved the race problem?  Hardly! It wasn’t intended to. So we got the integration and the riots right along with it–and now blatant anti-white discrimination and the perverted “transgender” movement have become new “civil rights.”

So exactly what are the “civil rights” of the white majority? Why they have the “civil right” to put up with all this, and to pay for all the cleanup from all the riots they got along with the “peaceful” integration!

Opportunistic liberal (socialist) white politicians played the “Civil Rights” game for all it was worth, and now black “Civil Rights” pimps are playing the same game. Roger Stone, in his book The Man Who Killed Kennedy–the Case Against LBJ  noted, on page 8 that: “The Kennedy civil rights record is also a myth. JFK mined for black votes in 1960. His bold call to Dr. King’s wife when King was jailed in Selma…brought the important endorsement of Dr. Martin Luther King Sr. and a major swing of black voters against Nixon…Yet JFK would drag his feet on civil rights…The open housing and voting rights acts promised by JFK were late in coming and stalled in Congress when he was killed.” And LBJ was not averse to playing the “Civil Rights” game for his own advantage.  On page 33 of Mr. Stone’s book he observes: “Kessler shared some of LBJ’s jaw-dropping racial slurs in a book called Inside the White House.  An Air Force One crew member stated that the President had his own opinions about the Civil Rights Movement ones that were the complete opposite of his public actions to make America a ‘Great Society,’ and he blatantly shared them with anyone within earshot…In a meeting aboard Air Force One, shortly after signing the Civil Rights Act, he was pleased to promise two governors: ‘I’ll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years’.” So it seems that black leaders were willing to use white liberal (socialist) politicians to get what they wanted and the white liberals were doing the same thing to them to further their own ends. Everybody used everybody. When you stop and think about it, this kind of reduces the “nobility” of the “Civil Rights” Movement to something slightly less than altruistic.

Now however people in the 1960s used the Civil Rights Movement for class struggle and for their own advantages, you have to admit that this movement, as it is interpreted in our day, has come a long long way, baby. Now it’s being used as the   reason to promote all manner of sexual perversion from sodomy to “transgender” rights.

When the State of North Carolina passed a common sense statute to keep “transgender” men out of women’s public restrooms it received a stinging rebuke from our current Marxist-in-Chief and his :”Just Us Department” as presently administered by Comrade Holder’s successor, Commissar Lynch. A World Net Daily  article for 5/5/16 stated: “In North Carolina, lawmakers adopted a law in March requiring people to use gender-designated public facilities that correspond to the gender listed on their driver’s license. The aim was to protect women from being confronted by a naked man. But the U.S. Department of Justice this week threatened the state with financial penalties, claiming the law violates the 1964 Civil Rights Act. That argument presumes Congress, in 1964, wanted men to be allowed to use womens’ restrooms and locker rooms and vice versa, which is ridiculous, contends Kellie Fiedorek, a legal counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, which specializes in civil and religious rights.” But all that doesn’t matter. Our current ruler is absolutely fixated on making sure “transgender” men get to use women’s bathrooms and the only thing that seems to concern him more is that he has not yet been able to find a way to disarm honest citizens and gut the Second Amendment. But don’t worry, he’s working on that one, too. In case you might, in your wildest fantasy, be tempted to ask about the “civil rights” of honest gun owners, please don’t bother. Their “civil rights” in the area of the Second Amendment will be abridged as soon as he can manage to find some way to do  it that sounds even quasi-legal.

And his co-dependent that heads up the :”Just Us Department” is working overtime to push whatever he says and to threaten those that do not agree. You have to understand that those who disagree with the edicts of the federal government, legal or not, their “civil rights” are automatically suspect, and if Commissar Lynch can find a way to suspend them she will. The one “civil right” you have is to comply with everything the federal government expects of you. Anything beyond that is “open to negotiation” depending on how compliant you are willing to be.

So just stay tuned, folks.  You will be surprised what the 1964 Civil Rights Act allows before you are done. And while those that rammed it through would probably be surprised at where it has gone and how it is now being used, I’m sure most of them would not disagree. They would probably, from their seats in the hottest of all possible places in hell, say, “Why didn’t we think of that?”