The “Compassionate” Left Just Shoots its Enemies

by Al Benson Jr.                                                                                                                   Member Board of Directors Confederate Society of America

In recent weeks it has really been displayed as to how truly “compassionate” and really open to “diversity” the political and theological Left really is. When all else fails, why just shoot your adversaries or perceived adversaries and then blame your actions on someone else’s actions or words. Of course the Leftists could just say “the Devil made me do it” and that would be pretty accurate, but preferring anything to honesty, the Leftists blather on about how “Trump made me do it” or “the Second Amendment forced me to take action so we could work at getting rid of it” or whatever other canned response they are supposed to give. To say that the Leftists and those who finance their actions are totally despicable is to state the case too mildly.  What those people really are is just not printable in this article so I will leave it to your imagination.

In recent weeks we have noted their words and actions toward Donald Trump. Had those words and actions been expended against Hitlery or Obama they would have been deemed a hate crime of grossest proportions. But, because those actions were taken against someone on the Right politically, they are not only perfectly acceptable, but the mainstream media simply adores them. This is cultural Marxism in living color, folks. This is one classic example of how it works.

That media “useful idiot” that held up the imitation of Trump’s bloody, decapitated head, even though she lost her job over it, is hailed as a glowing example of Leftist “diversity” and, no doubt, that Bernie Sanders supporter who shot Congressman Scalise  and several others this morning will be held up as yet another icon for the deranged Left to imitate. A comment on LewRockell.com this morning noted that “the cold civil war is turning hot.” When CNN, the epitome of fake news, reported on this morning’s shootings all they could say was “the gun kept shooting.” As though, somehow, the shooting was the fault of the gun rather than the man pulling the trigger!

Then there is that play in New York where President Trump gets assassinated on stage every evening. But that’s okay as long as the president is Trump. What do you think the reaction would be if the president in the play were Obama or Clinton? That would be treated as the hate crime of the century and the producers of the play would probably end up in the slammer, but because Trump is the president getting offed nightly it all gets a pass.

And there have been reports via the media, alternative and otherwise, that there could be a possible assassination attempt on Mr. Trump’s life. It’s a known fact that if the Leftists can’t get what they want any other way they are prone to try to remove obstacles to their agendas via assassination. So for them to make an attempt on Trump would be right up their alley. This is how they treat those who would dare to disagree with their version of how things should be done.

When the Leftists and those who finance them can’t get their way in some big city they stage a “peaceful protest” (read that riot)  and they destroy property and sometimes lives. This is what the Left always does. They are unable to create anything except mayhem and destruction–but that’s really what they are there for–as a tool of destruction to pave the way so that those who pay them for the destruction will then have a clear path to construct the “New World Order.” So the Leftists are bought and paid for–political prostitutes as it were. Now admittedly, they think more of themselves than that, but those who pay them don’t.

The shock troops of the Left may well end up starting a civil war in this country. There was a time when they could get totally away with all this evil, and it IS evil, so let’s don’t sugarcoat it with any of those pleasant-sounding Leftist euphemisms. However, that time has probably passed. The alternative media has done yeoman duty in alerting millions of Americans to much of what is going on, whereas, back when Nixon was forced out of office, there was hardly any alternative media to speak of. Now, thanks be to God, it is all over the place. There are many folks that don’t like InfoWars.com but the fact remains that they get something like 45 million viewers every month.  And then you have Breitbart, the Drudge Report, WorldNetDaily and a whole host of smaller ones that, believe it or not, actually expose what the Left and its financiers are doing. That’s the reason why Obama and his fellow Leftists wanted so badly to regulate the Internet–so they could begin to cut down on all the exposure the Leftists had been getting. They absolutely hate it when they realize you know what they are doing because it makes it that much harder for them to pull off.

One thing the Left hates is exposure (Ephesians 5:11), people learning about and exposing the evil they try to perpetrate daily. This is one way to fight back against them, exposing what they do and the reasons they do it, and, where possible, exposing those people that financially  enable them to do it.

There are some Christians that work at doing this. There needs to be more.

Nobody Wants to Talk Much About Seth Rich

by Al Benson Jr.

After having read several articles on the Internet pertaining to Seth Rich, I am beginning to get the impression that, for whatever reason, this is a murder case almost no one wants to talk about. When I see something of this nature I always wonder–why?

One article I read was on http://www.businessinsider.com written by David Choi on May 25th. It had the usual information in it about how Mr. Rich, a 27 year old DNC staff member, was shot in the back in what was supposed to have been a “botched robbery.” It seems Rich was on the phone at the time, had to hang up, and there seems to have been a scuffle between Rich and his killer.

Since his murder there have been many stories out there on the Internet as to what the reason was for his murder. I couldn’t prove any of them one way or the other, however, Mr. Choi’s story noted: “Rod Wheeler, a private investigator associated with Rich’s family, told a Fox News affiliate in Washington that there was evidence that proved the alleged contact between Rich and WikiLeaks. Wheeler also suggested that the Metropolitan Police Department tried to cover up the nature of Rich’s death on behalf of the DNC, an allegation the police department denied.”

Interestingly enough, Wheeler later retracted this statement, telling people he had gotten this information from a Fox reporter. Now I wonder why, if he had gotten this from a Fox reporter, did he then go on to pass it along to a Fox affiliate in Washington? Wouldn’t a Fox reporter already have done that? It just seems odd that he would pass something along to a Fox affiliate that he’d gotten from a Fox reporter. But then, you never know, and in many cases such as this you are not supposed to know.

Also, a couple weeks after Rich’s death, WikiLeaks dumped lots and lots of internal emails that seem to have come from the DNC and there is speculation that at least some of that might have come from Rich. If so, it makes you wonder why he did it if he did it. Again, we can’t say for sure. Did Rich see some things going on he didn’t approve of?

Commentary on a blog spot I read noted: “Rich was shot and killed last July in Northwest D.C. and police have suggested the killing in the District’s Bloomingdale neighborhood was a botched robbery. Funny, nothing taken and shot in the back. (Sound familiar?)”

On the same blog was another comment: “Yeah, then there’s the 32 year old man due to testify about Clinton the next week, found dead of an apparent ‘heart attack,’ just a couple weeks ago. Something stinks in Denmark…” This commentary was posted May 16th.

Sean Hannity covered some of this on Fox News recently and now, all of a sudden, he’s not covering it anymore and there is talk of him being “fired.” You might take each of these incidents separately and not make too much of any of them. But taken as a whole they at least raise some reasonable questions, not that I expect we will ever get any reasonable answers.

The Deep State folks will just dismiss it all as “conspiracy theories” and after they make that statement no one is supposed to ask anymore questions–ever again. Years ago Hillary made a statement about a “vast right wing conspiracy” that was out to get her husband. I wonder, does that make Hillary a conspiracy theorist?

It’s all kind of like the Warren Commission Report of the Kennedy assassination–which is supposed to be the defining document about John Kennedy’s assassination. In all honesty, does anyone believe the Warren Commission Report? No one I ever talked to believes it. And most folks are not going to believe that Seth Rich was the victim of a “botched robbery” either.

If you look at some of the events perpetrated by the Swamp Creatures in Washington that Trump wants to get rid of, over the years, you begin to see sort of a pattern to many of them. As the blogger I quoted earlier said; “Sound familiar?”

American Taliban’s False Religion Displayed in New Orleans

by Al Benson Jr.

Just came across an article on http://www.wwl.com that noted the cultural Marxist excuse for a mayor in New Orleans is asking the public for support in his quest to practice his cultural genocide agenda by removing Confederate monuments in his fair city.

The article noted: “New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu is trying to recruit supporters to show they are behind the effort to remove Confederate statues in New Orleans. Through his political action committee Landrieu sent out emails asking for support…The mayor calls on readers to sign on to show they are with him in this effort.” This article was posted on April 27th–five days ago.

Had you been naive enough to believe what was reported in the prostitute press, you would have concluded that Landrieu had almost total unqualified support for his purge of Confederate monuments.  That was the impression given. Now, according to this article, written by Jeff Cohen, we begin to discern that maybe the facade of support for Landrieu’s agenda regarding all things Confederate was just that–a facade. And maybe all the implied support for his purge ain’t really there. So now he’s out trying to fire up the troops so it won’t look like he’s out there all by his lonesome on the anti-Confederate front line.

He’s still spouting his rehearsed line about “diversity, inclusion, and tolerance.” However it would seem that his version of “diversity” does not extend to white folks who want to celebrate their culture and heritage like others want to celebrate theirs. After all, Confederate heritage doesn’t deserve to be there. It’s not “equal” with all those other “diversities”–like sodomy, transgenderism and socialism. Do you think if there were a statue of Harvey Milk in New Orleans Landrieu would be trying to take it down? Not on your life, baby. He’d be laying a wreath at the base of the statue to commemorate “diversity.”

For the cultural Marxist (of which the American Taliban is one small part) “diversity” is part of his religious faith–but it must always be his diversity and never anyone else’s.

I have a good friend in Illinois who follows the theological trends of various anti-Christian groups, the cultural Marxists among them, and he offered this comment just today, which I thought was particularly relevant and accurate. He said: “These people (cultural Marxists and their ilk) believe that reality is relative. Therefore, they believe that destroying the cultural symbols that are here, they can replace them with their version of reality and thereby take control. This is why they refuse to believe in God. God means that reality is absolute. So by refusing to recognize His existence, they think they can eliminate His absolute reality and replace it with their own relative reality, thus establishing their ‘reality’ as the new ‘absolute’.  The only problem with that is that God’s reality remains in place, immovable, and their reality against His crashes and burns. In other words they believe in and are trying to impose an illusion.” That is a pretty fair country definition of where anti-Christ religion is really at–smoke and mirrors.

Ultimately, all these issues humanity has to deal with are religious issues. Many have political or economic manifestations, but at root, they are religious–and we are not being taught to grasp this truth anymore, have not been taught to grasp it for generations. Our “educations”–so called, have conditioned us to not even think in these terms.

This mindset is straight out of the French Revolution, where the revolutionaries hated the biblical concept of original sin, and so they had to replace that truth with something that make them more comfortable. So they did–and we got the guillotine and other manifestations of their religious faith. During the Bolshevik Revolution we were treated to manifestations of Lenin’s religious faith.

So, at its base, the destruction of Confederate history, culture, and heritage is a not-too-well-concealed attempt to replace the mostly Christian culture of the Old South with a vapor, a spiritual illusion that the cultural Marxist feels more at home with. Racism, bigotry, intolerance, and all these other handy catch phrases they parrot are nothing more than a cover for their true agenda–the suppression of Christian truth and the replacing of that ultimate Truth (John 14:6) with the illusion of their “truth” along with their desire to destroy what they hate. It is the “hath God said” of the 21st century (Genesis 3:1).

Leave people with no cultural history or roots and no cultural future–and you get to decide what their future will be! That’s the real name of this theological shell game. And there is only one way you deal with it–exposure and resistance! 

Compassionate Communism For the Kiddies

by Al Benson Jr.

Years ago I read an article by William Lind in which he labeled many of America’s colleges as “little ivy-covered North Koreas.” Having had some experience with colleges, I have to say honestly, that Mr. Lind’s description is not all that far off. He knew whereof he spoke.

I recall a college on the East Coast (and some of my readers will know about this) that, back in 1970, invited a “community organizer” (that title ring any bells?)  to come in during a special session they had for students in early January of that year, supposedly to help students “solve their problems.” It turned out, thanks to a good bit of exposure by a pastor who had a local radio program there that the public was able to find out that this “community organizer” was, in fact, a well-known  and identified Communist Party member who was there, basically, to indoctrinate the students. Naturally the parents of the students were not informed of this man’s Leftist connections and when the pastor exposed them on his radio broadcast, every day for about a week, it was truly a revelation to most folks. Then, someone who had access to the school’s mailing list sent a letter to several of the parents detailing this man’s Communist connections. And this wasn’t “fake news”–the pastor had the goods on this turkey. Unfortunately this sort of thing, to one degree or another, is very typical of American colleges and universities.  Parents need to be really careful about where they enroll their kids in college. All that seems to glitter ain’t necessarily gold!

It’s generally pretty well agreed to by most of us that have looked at what public schools try to do to our kids (unless we educate them privately) that the public education system is already (and always has been) slanted precariously toward the left, so you already have that to deal with going in. There is probably a handful of good, faithful teachers that keep the system from sliding totally over the Left Bank, but they seem to be getting numerically less with each passing year.

And now it seems that one college in the East may be getting impatient and may want to aid the public school system in a speedier communizing of  your kids.

According to http://freebeacon.com  for April 10th: “MIT Press Publishes ‘Communism for Kids’ Book.”  The subheading for this article is “Lovable little revolutionaries teach children communism is ‘not that hard’.” The MIT Press is run by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. So here we have a major college in this country publishing a book, written by a German writer that specializes in political theory and queer politics. Now is that a magic combination or what? If you don’t think these two subjects have common aspects to one another, then you haven’t been paying attention.

This is a children’s book, published by MIT Press in March of 2017, and it sells for only $12.95–a convenient price for impoverished revolutionaries  who don’t have lots of bread to spend. This is a book that will help them radicalize their kids on the cheap.

The author of this book, Bini Adamczak, is German, and so MIT Press had to translate this book into English to get it into publication here Seems like a lot of fuss for a book teaching kids to be communists–unless someone involved in the whole process wanted this revolutionary work to be available for parents and kids in this country that would be prone to use it. And what does that tell you about MIT?

The Free Beacon article notes: “The book is full of cartoon drawings of ‘lovable little revolutionaries’ that help navigate the kids through the ‘evils’ of capitalism.” Wonder who will be around to navigate them through the evils of communism, which are much worse. A main thesis of this kiddie’s tome is that communism really isn’t all that bad, but it just seems that way because it hasn’t been “done right.” I’ve seen this kind of thing done before in books for adults, and permit me to say that this kind of specious reasoning amounts to little more than a gigantic pile of Texas cow chips that you don’t want to stick the toe of your boot into on a hot day. And you especially don’t want your kids anywhere near it!

This kind of thing, published by a college or not, is pure propaganda and any parent allowing this kind of thing for their kids is guilty of dereliction of duty as a parent. I have, over the years, talked to people who have lived under communism. Back in the late 1970s I interviewed a lady from Ukraine, who had lived there during World War 2,  for a magazine article I wrote. What she could tell you about communism would curl your hair–but then, I guess that was because they just didn’t “do it right.” Her family ended up in a German labor camp, where she said they were treated better than they had been being “free” in Ukraine. But I digress.

If you have to send your kids to college and you don’t have lots of choices, then you need to keep an eye on the books they use for course material and you need to, as much as possible, ascertain what their professors are giving them for lecture materials in class. Otherwise they may, at some point, when they graduate and get married, rear up a bunch of “lovable little revolutionaries” for you as grandchildren.

What About Hillary’s Security Clearance?

by Al Benson Jr.

Just read an interesting article on http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com for April 5th that stated: “A stunning report from Fox News indicates that the Obama administration granted former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton  and six of her top aides access to top secret and classified information–even after she left the State Department in 2013, even after she announced a run for the White House in April of 2015, and even after FBI Director James Comey declared that Clinton and her staff had been ‘extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information’.” Seeing that Hillary and associates are above the law I realize none of this will make any difference, but it bugs me enough that I have to write about it anyway.

Knowing the Marxist proclivities of the Obama administration this should come as no surprise. With classified information in the hands of the Obama administration, the country’s enemies already had control of it, so if Hillary, accidentally or otherwise, spread some of it around–why who cared?

Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa noted this and he said: “I have repeatedly asked the State Department whether Secretary Clinton and her associates had their clearances suspended or revoked to which the Obama administration refused to respond.”  No surprise here either. Obama continually “stonewalled” Grassley’s requests for this information. That tell you anything?  Grassley took note of this and passed this information on to the new Secretary of State under Trump, Rex Tillerson. He also observed to Tillerson that Clinton had asked for access to classified information because she was in the process of writing her memoirs (again).

How many times has this woman testified before some congressional committee or other that  she could barely remember her own name and that of her infamous husband, but any details over and above these seemed to totally escape her? Yet when it comes to writing yet another book (for which she will get millions) all of a sudden all the memories and details thereof come flooding back (at least those she wants us to know about).

Just a couple brief questions here: Why did she need access to classified information to write her memoirs? Was she planning on passing along some of that information to her readers? Fox News also asked some of these same questions so I am not alone. The Political Insider article noted: “Fox News reported, ‘The State Department has not yet responded to an inquiry from Fox News as to whether Clinton, or her staff…still have access to the classified and top-secret archives and systems’.”

Believe it or not, almost three months into a Trump administration, this question is still pending. Grassley is still wanting to know if the current Secretary of State agrees with the FBI determination that Hillary was “extremely careless” in dealing with classified information. He also wants to know–and this is the sixty-four dollar question–Has the State Department started to review the security clearances of Hillary or her aides?

Grassley asked that question, as noted in an article on The Hill on March 31st of this year. So it’s a legitimate question at this point. One can almost hear someone in the State Department shouting in reply: We have already cancelled Hillary’s security clearance tomorrow!  So, has Hillary’s security clearance and those of her aides been revoked at this point–and if not, why not??? That’s the other brief question.

The State Department has been a thorn in the sides of genuine patriots all the way back to the days of Alger Hiss. Maybe none of you all are old enough to remember him. If the name doesn’t ring any bells look him up on the Internet.

So we need to ask, in all honesty–even with a Trump administration–do we still have the same problems with the State Department that we have had in the past? What about Hillary’s security clearance??? Has it been revoked, or do we need to start asking our senators why it hasn’t been? Rand Paul might be a good one to ask about that. I’m sure he’d have a more genuine concern than many of the others, and he’d want answers too.

“Racist” Cows?

by Al Benson Jr.

We have been duly informed by the politically correct, the cultural Marxists among us, that anyone politically to the right of Ho Chi Minh or Fidel Castro is a “deplorable” racist. Evidence  for this accusation?  Well, who needs evidence? Just say it long enough and loud enough and people will believe it. The Social Justice warriors way over on the Far Left fringe have decreed it. Ain’t that enough? After all, who would even think of questioning “social justice” or its  provocateurs?

However, in recent days the social justice campaign seems to have reached new and more glorious  heights. According to the website Intellihub the animal rights group PETA has continued to add to its list of “unusual” claims, and this time they have put out a video that literally claims that drinking milk just might mean you are a closet racist. Intellihub recently said: “The group posted the video on Friday in a Tweet that reads, ‘Did you know that milk has long been a symbol used by white supremacists?”

Wow, I didn’t know that did you? Well, they say you learn something new every day (even if it is slightly off the wall). So now we have had the ultimate tool of the Far Right white supremacy crowd exposed for what it really is–Milk, white milk! Well, if it’s white it must be “racist” right?  I mean, everything white is racist isn’t it? Makes you wonder about snow doesn’t it?

So I thought, in view of this startling revelation that we ought to take this whole racist scenario one step further and expose yet another layer of deep-rooted racism–Cows!

I mean, after all, the brown cow eats green grass but she gives white milk, so it stands to reason, at least among the progressive Left, that the cow is racist too. Doesn’t it? What other logical conclusion could a devout cultural Marxist come up with? If she wasn’t racist couldn’t we, at least once in awhile, depend on chocolate milk from her? The fact that she continually provides only white milk must indicate that the cow, knowingly or not, has deep racist tendencies.  And what about her owner? He has to be a flaming racist too. Do we dare ask how many cows he has that only give white milk? Is there a right-wing conspiracy here among the agricultural set to flood the country with white milk? If so, this needs to be exposed. The Communist News Network should send out some hot-shot reporter, have him sneak around the dairy farm and get some samples of that white milk. Then he could have them tested for the amount of inherent racism they might contain. Anything over 50 grams per udderful would be enough to seal his journalistic career forever.

We must realize that this is a serious problem!  Racist milk from racist cows is flooding the country. Valiant anti-racists just can’t obtain brown, yellow, red, or black milk–all these miserable bovines today provide for us is this insipid, racist white stuff. Why it’s enough to gag a maggot!

The social justice folks need to start scratching around under the rocks and barrels to see if they can find a friend somewhere in Congress, one who might be ready to expose all this. Once they produce such a specimen he could introduce mandatory legislation nationwide that would force all daily farmers to inoculate their cows with something approved by the FDA that would turn the color of the milk given by cows into something besides white. I imagine, to the Flakes over on the leftist fringe, that would seem to be a reasonable solution to this horrible problem.

Seem to me I have seen an article or two in the local LameStream Media outlets that discussed in depth the traumatic experiences undergone by those that were forced to drink white milk. Having to drink white milk was more traumatic for them than someone having tipped over their little red wagons when they were three years old.

I know you can get chocolate and strawberry milk flavorings at the local super market, but even if you buy and use them, somehow it just isn’t the same when you realize the milk was white to begin with.

So there has to be some solution that could be introduced that would call for more federal regulation and at least one more layer of bureaucracy to ease the unemployment problems that Obama’s stimulus packages didn’t quite take care of.

I can see it now–pre-planned spontaneous street demonstrations all across the country, with people marching and carrying signs that say “White is Right; Strawberry is Red; and Chocolate is—whatever!” And you thought Trump’s Russian scenario was something!  Brother, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet!

Ryan Pushed “Obamacare Lite” and it Flopped!

by Al Benson Jr.

After John Boehner left as Speaker of the House the Republicans were, supposedly, going to replace him with a real “conservative” who would be truly concerned with the will of the people. After lots of backroom dealing, we got Paul Ryan instead. He was touted as a “conservative” but that was a pile of West Texas cow chips, as he turned out to be little more than a water carrier for Comrade Obama.

Comrade Ryan, oh, pardon me, I meant Speaker Ryan, has long been a part of the Ruling Establishment, concerned with preserving the status quo (stiffing the public), which is one reason he never supported Donald Trump in his presidential bid. Trump just wasn’t one of the “good old boys” and if, by some fluke, he won, Ryan was going to do nothing whatever to help him along because he took his orders from the Ruling Establishment of which he is a part. And their plan has long been to derail Trump by whatever means possible, be it by far-out Russian conspiracy theories about Trump cavorting around with every Russian despot back to the Czar, or whatever. And I have to be honest, it’s the “whatever” that bothers me.

Trump had promised before the election that he would repeal and replace Obamacare, and up to this point, it seems as though Trump has been trying to fulfill the promises he made to the American people–something I have never seen any candidate  do in my lifetime. But when it came to replacing Obamacare,  Trump seemed to lean on Paul Ryan to handle this and it seems that Ryan already had a plan that he said would do the trick. Well, guess what? It didn’t. I have not read any of the ins and outs of Ryan’s “replacement” bill, but from comments I have seen from others who did, it seemed like he was replacing as little of Obamacare as possible and retaining, in some form, as much of it as he could. This would have been so typical for the “conservative” Ryan that anyone who has watched him should have expected it. A major part of Ryan’s chore as Speaker of the House has been to preserve as much of the status quo as possible while giving the appearance of helping to dismantle it. A thorny chore, but so far he’s been up to it.

However, he health care “replacement” bill did not fool too many people. Of course the Democrats were expected to vote against anything that might even minimally weaken the health care diktat of their cherished Barack. But then, the Democrats today are, to all intents and purposes, further to the Left now than the Communist Party dared to be forty years ago, so what else is new?

However, there were some Republicans, some of them in what they call “the Freedom Caucus” that could see through this Obamacare remake and they were not going to vote for it–thank heaven! As much as I want to see Obamacare repealed, and as much as Mr. Trump seems to want to see it repealed and replaced, this bill of Paul Ryan’s was not the vehicle that would have done that. It preserved more than it replaced–and I’m sure that was the intent.

There have been calls now for Ryan to step down as Speaker of the House, and, given his conservatively insipid performance since he’s been up there, I think that’s a capital idea. Only if he does, this time the Republicans need to do a lot better than just picking another RINO like they did the last time!

If Mr. Trump is really serious about “draining the swamp” he is going to find out that many of the major contributors to the perpetuation of the swamp are in his own party and they are trying to deep six his efforts every bit as much as Hillary, Soros, and the rest of the Lefties are, because, in the final analysis, they all work for the same people, and the party labels are superfluous.  We should pray for wisdom and  discernment for the President. He will need all he can get, lest the Judas goats overwhelm him!