The House Agenda—Fund Obamacare—but make it look like you didn’t want to

By Al Benson Jr.

The whole House of Representatives fuss over funding Obamacare is one more charade the federal government is putting over on the public—just like public schools and elections. I’m not saying there is no one in the House that wants to defund this socialist monstrosity—there are many, but the House leadership wants Obamacare just as much as Obama and his agenda-setters want it. However, they must give the illusion of opposition, just like Romney did in the last election.

In an article on for October 2nd, Christopher Collins stated: “When the House passed legislation to defund Obamacare but would keep the government running through mid-December, the Senate, led by Senate Majority Leader, Senator Harry Reid stated that they would not budge on Obamacare and the legislation was defeated. On Monday, Dr. Harold Pease, an expert on the United States Constitution, stated that the authority in dealing with Obamacare funding belongs in the U.S. House, not the U.S. Senate and that the House is doing this all wrong.”

Knowing the way the political hucksters in Washington operate can anyone honestly believe this is by accident? Folks, in spite of all their conservative rhetoric about defunding Obamacare the House leadership is just as much in favor of forcing it down our throats as the Democratic socialists are. The only difference is the House leadership doesn’t want us to know this and so they give us this facade of opposition.

Pease went on to note: “All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills. To fund anything, in this case Obamacare, first approval is required by the House of Representatives. If that does not happen taxpayer money cannot be spent…”

The article said: “When the House attached Obamacare to the legislation in funding the government, it made a mistake in doing so and the funding of Obamacare should have been separate, thereby giving the Senate no power in denying the Houses’ request to defund Obamacare.”

Pease observed that: “House opposition to funding Obamacare would have been far more powerful if made a ‘stand alone’ bill not attached to general funding, but it is not. ‘Stand alone’ having no other parts, would have left the Senate no wiggle or compromise room once it went to them, nor would there be for the Joint Conference Committee thereafter that reconciles any differences between the two houses. There would be nothing to reconcile. Obamacare is merely defunded.”

And the article concludes “If Obamacare is removed from the government budget, presented and voted on as a separate bill, Obamacare can be defunded by the House. If that is the case, then the Senate and the President has no constitutional authority to override the Houses’ decision.”

Will the House leadership allow such a move? Don’t hold your breath, baby! It ain’t gonna happen. The House leadership works for the same Council on Foreign Relations elitist leadership in Washington and New York that the Democratic leadership works for. They all have the same agenda. Party labels and differences are little more than a subterfuge. They all want Obamacare because it is, as one man I know who writes, has labeled it,  RED Medicine.

If you want an interesting exercise try writing your Congressperson and asking them to introduce a bill in the House dealing with defunding Obamacare as a “stand alone” bill as it should have been done in the first place. See what kind of response you get. You might find a handful of Congressmen that would be willing to do this, but I’d be willing to bet that 90-% of the replies you get back, if they even bother, will be to explain to you in lofty political jargon why “we can’t do that.”

Folks, the “fix” has been in for a long time and you’re supposed to get Obamacare no matter what. If 95% of the populace hates it, makes no difference at all. Obamacare is part of the Marxist agenda folks, no matter which “party” is in office.

3 thoughts on “The House Agenda—Fund Obamacare—but make it look like you didn’t want to

  1. Pingback: The House Agenda—Fund Obamacare—but make it look like you didn’t want to | Christian Liberty News



    Two-thirds of the poor blacks and single mothers in the United States, and more half of the low-wage workers without health insurance, will be DENIED any support for their health care under Obama’s “Affordable Care Act,” even while the cost of the coverage available to them increases drastically. A New York Times analysis of census data shows that the 26 states which chose not to expand Medicaid (a choice left to the states under Obamacare), comprise half the nation’s population but 68% of the poor, uninsured blacks and single mothers, who will not be eligible for coverage under the killer scheme.
    The study estimates that eight million Americans are “impoverished, uninsured, and ineligible for help.”
    The study did not even count the huge undocumented immigrant population.
    It is no surprise that the winners in the Obamacare game are from Wall Street’s big insurers. This is inherent in the fascist (corporatist) nature of the plan, which unites the health insurance cartels with the government, in a drive to cut back health care for the “useless eaters” in the population.
    Robert Lenzner of Forbes reported Oct. 1 that the “value of the S&P health insurance index gained 43%” this year alone. CIGNA is up 63%; Wellpoint 47%; and United Healthcare 28%. Since the passage of Obamacare in 2010, the stock values of these big firms have risen 200-300%!
    United Healthcare, the largest insurer, with about 70 million insured, reported last summer that they had a particularly strong past year, with net income of $5.1 billion, up by 11% from the previous year; similarly for the others — even before the bonanza to result from the corporatist plan to force every American to buy their inflated products, beginning on October 1.
    United Healthcare, it should be recalled, has as a top executive Simon Stevens, who was Tony Blair’s health policy advisor and the architect of NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) in 1999, the “reform” of the British National Health Service which imposed triage and genocide on the British people through selective denial of cancer drugs, surgeries, kidney dialysis, and other treatments. This was the model for the IPAB (Independent Payment Advisory Board), which is now the law of the land under Obamacare. Genocide can be profitable. ”
    ( Obamacare Genocide in Action: What is Already Underway )

    “UnitedHealth Group Incorporated is a diversified managed health care company headquartered in Minnetonka, Minnesota, U.S. It is No. 17 on Fortune magazines top 500 companies in the United States.[5] UnitedHealth Group offers a spectrum of products and services through two operating businesses: UnitedHealthcare and Optum. Through its family of subsidiaries and divisions, UnitedHealth Group serves approximately 70 million individuals nationwide. ”
    ” Abigail Pierrepont (Abby) Johnson[4] (born December 19, 1961) is an American businesswoman. Johnson is President of Fidelity Investments Personal and Workplace Investing. Fidelity was founded by her grandfather Edward C. Johnson II and her father Edward C. (Ned) Johnson III is its current CEO. As of March 2013 The Johnson family owns a 49% stake in the company.[3]
    She had a brief stint as a consultant at Booz Allen & Hamilton from 1985–86, completed an MBA at Harvard, and joined Fidelity Investments ”
    Arthur Johnson, an Independent Trustee of Fidelity, is also a director of Booz Allen & Hamilton.
    “In 2008 Carlyle Group bought a majority stake in Booz Allen for $2.54 billion.”
    ” Carlyle is the 11th largest defense contractor in the US. It is 20%-owned by Mellon Bank ( and is controlled by the powerful Blackstone Group (seeOverthrow of the American Republic), which dined cheaply on the carcasses of looted S&L’s at auctions held by Bush Sr.’s Resolution Trust Corporation. ”
    ” Henry Kissinger’s good friend Lord JACOB ROTHSCHILD sat on Bioport owner Blackstone’s International Advisory Board. (See Corexit Linked to the Blackstone Group and Lord Jacob Rothschild) ”
    ” Blackstone was founded in 1985 as a mergers and acquisitions boutique by Peter G. Peterson and Stephen A. Schwarzman, who had previously worked together at Lehman Brothers, Kuhn, Loeb Inc. ”
    Peter G. Peterson ” is founding Chairman of the Peterson Institute for International Economics ”
    Lynn Forester de Rothschild, the wife of EVELYN DE ROTHSCHILD, is a director of the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    Blackstone is also related with the LCF EDMOND DE ROTHSCHILD, for example, through the person of Daniel Costa Lindo that is a M&A Analyst at Blackstone and was Private Equity Analyst at LCF Edmond de Rothschild.
    ( )

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s