By Al Benson Jr.
Never did I consider myself a dyed-in-the-wool “birther” regarding the birth certificate supposedly presented to the public by our current Marxist-in-Chief in the Red House, but I must admit I would have liked to have seen a genuine birth certificate from him. We have so little information about him in other areas, with virtually no information about him available anywhere. It’s all sealed. It would seem that Marxist “transparency” rules in Washington. For this administration that means handing the public a blank sheet of paper with nothing on either side—but if you hold it up to the light you can see through it.
A “genuine” birth certificate was supposedly presented to the public back in April of 2011 and that was supposed to silence the queries of the “great unwashed.” Within a day computer experts demonstrated how this document had been created and many of the problems with it. These problems remain today, having never been resolved.
On July 19th an article by Jeffrey Kuhner appeared in The Washington Times dealing with the investigation as to the authenticity of Obama’s birth certificate conducted by Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona and the team of specialists he brought in to check the authenticity of the birth certificate . The conclusion of their investigation is that the birth certificate presented to the public is a forgery. They do not attempt to lay blame for the forgery but they do believe it is forged.
According to Kuhner’s article: “His (the Sheriff’s) chief investigator, Mike Zullo, says that the document is full of errors and omissions. In particular, Mr. Zullo claims that the numeric sections are not filled out that otherwise would have been in birth certificates from Hawaii during that time. But other sections, such as those dealing with Mr. Obama’s race and his father’s work and field of study, are completed. Hence Sheriff Arpaio’s investigative posse definitely believes the birth certificate is not authentic, but was manufactured to provide Mr. Obama with a veneer of constitutional legitimacy.”
Kuhner then observes: “ Sheriff Arpaio’s findings threaten to plunge America into an unprecedented crisis. For if—and again, I emphasize if—he is correct, then Mr. Obama has perpetrated the most elaborate hoax in U.S. history. A fraudulent birth certificate would mean that Mr. Obama is ineligible to serve as commander-in-chief. His presidency would therefore be legally and constitutionally illegitimate.” What that would mean is that everything he has done while in office, Obamacare, the Stimulus packages, all the executive orders and all the political appointments would all be null and void. This would make Watergate look like a Sunday school picnic!
Kuhner notes that “the ruling elites—the establishment media, the Hollywood left, the federal bureaucracy, the myriad regulatory agencies, the public sector unions, big banks and the financial sector—have refused to seriously examine Mr. Obama’s background. In fact they have repeatedly propped him up.” Somewhere along the line some of these people know the real story, and part of their agenda is to try to make those digging up this information look stupid or seem like “conspiracy nuts.” They have a vested interest in making sure this information is suppressed.
I watched the video interview the Sheriff and Mr. Zullo gave regarding the “genuine’ birth certificate. They were very thorough in the evidence they presented and took care to make sure it was all presented in the proper context. After the interview was over the “news” media got to ask their questions. They couldn’t have cared less about the evidence presented. They were not there to gather news—they were there to try to put the right spin on it. Most of their questions were about things having nothing to do with the “genuine” birth certificate. They hardly wanted to discuss that. It didn’t fit their agenda.
Not only is the origin of the “genuine” birth certificate in doubt in this country, but in Europe as well. On 6/27/12 a report on http://www.wnd.com noted that: “…a former aide to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher warns his hereditary peers in the U.K. the Obama presidency is in danger of failing because of evidence he considers conclusive that Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery. ‘Mr. Obama’s legitimacy is now in doubt’ Lord Christopher Monckton concludes” in a 20-page report published by World Net Daily.
World Net Daily also published a report in January of 2011 where they interviewed a former Hawaiian elections clerk, Tim Adams, According to World Net Daily, Mr. Adams “…has now signed an affidavit swearing he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi’olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities” So if that’s the case, then where did this “genuine” birth certificate posted on the Internet for the gullible public come from? Some backroom ribbon clerk in Washington that was told to put it together? It’s like everything else about this president—we know nothing! All the information about him is sealed away–all in the name of “transparency and openness.”
The secret about his “genuine” birth certificate has got to be the most poorly kept secret in the country. It’s like everyone knows it but no one will admit to knowing it. They just ignore it. All we have is this “genuine” birth certificate that was never really there.
Watergate got lots of press coverage because some of the useful idiots in the “news” media actually thought Nixon was a conservative and so they honed in for the attack. Obama is a Marxist. He will get a free pass from the media no matter how blatant his falsehoods are they will be treated as revealed “truth” from on high—the “wisdom of the ages.” The possibility that he is something other than what he appears to be will be swept under Washington’s political rug to fester with the rest of the vermin there.
My first thought is that the American public ought to stand up and demand answers from the politbureau in Washington and Congress should look into this, but who is to say we would get any straight answers from them? We probably wouldn’t, but we need to fuss at them anyway. They need to know that we know and that they ain’t fooling anybody.
My second thought is—if this guy is a fraud (we already know he’s a Marxist) then why must preachers and pastors in church every Lord’s Day pray for him that he will govern the country wisely? I can see them praying for his soul, and then they should call on him to repent. Unfortunately, many evangelical pastors today seem to have a particular tolerance for leftist politicians they would hardly display for anyone on the right.
Maybe that’s part of our problem.
As an addendum to this article check out http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/48202 if possible. I did not have that info when I posted this article but think it is worth people looking at if they can.