Want to lose your private property? If so support Agenda 21

By Al Benson Jr.

I have had major problems with the United Nations for decades now. It is an organization that has had the support of Communists and socialists all over the world, including many in this country. Does anyone remember Alger Hiss? Many younger folks will not, but just for the heck of it do a Google search on Mr. Hiss and see what you find—a major connection between him, the State Department, the United Nations, and communism. Also do a Google search on a book by G. Edward Griffin called The Fearful Master. If you can still purchase this book, do so.

Given its deep pink background, why should we be surprised that the United Nations should come up with something like Agenda 21. It’s right down their collectivist alley. Never heard of it, you say. Not surprising. What passes for news media in this country is not about to let you know about Agenda 21 until the current Marxist administration can find some way to sidestep the Constitution and ram it down our throats.

According to http://green-agenda.com “Agenda 21 was the main outcome of the United Nations Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. Agenda 21 outlines, in detail, the UN’s vision for a centrally managed global society. The contract binds governments around the world to the United Nations plan for controlling the way we live, eat, learn, move and communicate—all under the noble banner of saving the earth. If fully implemented, Agenda 21 would have the government involved in every aspect of life of every human on earth.”

The article continues: “Agenda 21 spreads its tentacles from Governments, to federal and local authorities, and right down to community groups.” These people have a concept of One World Government that will embrace everyone everywhere. No one gets to sneak under the collectivist radar.

Maurice Strong, first Secretary General of the United Nations Environmental Programme has stated: “The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation. It is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation states, however powerful. The global community must be assured of environmental security…Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class—involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, air-conditioning, and suburban housing—are not sustainable. A shift is necessary which will require a vast strengthening of the multilateral system, including the United Nations.”

Stop and look at what this man is saying. The United Nations has determined that your life style is no longer to be allowed. If they have their way they will control what you eat, where you live, whether you get to drive your car, even whether you will be allowed air conditioning. It all makes you wonder if these One World planners are going to subject themselves to the conditions they are planning for the rest of us. Somehow, with my suspicious mind, I rather doubt that. Part of their price for reducing the rest of us to serfs will be the ability to enjoy a life style that they wish to deny to the rest of us. Sound familiar?

The site http://patriotupdate.com has listed many of those things that Agenda 21 will eliminate in order that the world may be more “environmentally sustainable.” In an article by Ralph Barker, written in September, 2011 Mr. Barker points out many of these “unsustainable” things we will have to forego:
All private property—(naturally, in accordance with the Communist Manifesto)
Livestock production and most meat consumption,
Privately owned vehicles and personal travel,
Use of fossil fuels for power generation or mechanized travel,
Single family homes,
Human population must be reduced to fewer than 1 billion people. How do you suppose they will manage this last one? The same way the Communists did in the Ukraine in the 1930s?

You may think this sounds far out and it’s something you might want to think about in twenty years or so, maybe, but the fact is that 179 countries have already signed on to Agenda 21 and “nearly 12,000 local and federal authorities have legally committed themselves to the Agenda. If your town or country signs onto this thing it means you don’t even sneeze without UN permission.

Some towns across the country are waking up to this draconian measure and are taking a stand against it. A locality in Texas recently voted against this, as did the town of Colton, California. If this UN measure ever comes before your town council they need to be on record as voting against it.

Ask yourselves just one question—if you live in the Deep South in the United States, how will any relatives you have with respiratory conditions survive the summers there without air conditioning? They won’t—but then that is probably part of the United Nations plan isn’t it?

10 thoughts on “Want to lose your private property? If so support Agenda 21

  1. Pingback: Al: Have you read about Agenda 21 in your “news” papers lately? It’s one of those little tidbits the managed media thinks you are better off not knowing about, that way you can’t fuss too much about it. Read this latest on http://r


  3. Pingback: U.S. Sheriffs Block New World Order: Absconding American Citizen’s Property By Colluding With Obama’s Unconstitutional Executive Order For U.N. Agenda 21. « Political Vel Craft

  4. Mr. Benson,

    “Agenda 21” also goes by the name “Sustainable Development” and involves the procurement of property using eminent domain laws.

    The UN helped the modern nation of Israel get established with the help of the Rothschilds, wealthy Jewish families, and the World Zionist Federation among others. Could it have been an act of God like many believe? Of course, He can use nefarious men to carry out His plan as well as those trying to live righteously. But, things have consequences. Look at the trouble we’ve got today with these wars we’re fighting for Israel and the ones we’re about to engage in, Syria and Iran. Jesus warned us of all this didn’t He?… wars and rumors of wars, Jerusalem being a “cup of trembling”. But He also told us to not let it trouble our hearts and that these things must pass.

    Today we’ve got settlers taking land from Palestinian families that lived in the region of the Gaza strip for hundreds of years. As a Bible-believing Christian that doesn’t wish to divide the land as commanded by our Lord, I remain neutral on the subject other than my thoughts in pondering what really is going on there. I see a similar eminent domain thing happening with the UN’s blessing, using Zionist support from the Old Testament, faulty support, but that’s my opinion. What credentials do you need to walk up to a Palestinian family and tell them you’re taking their home because you are a descendant of Abraham? Maybe they are too. After thousands of years, there’s a lot of mixed blood going around. For proof of ownership, do you get out your pocket DNA tester and show them? Is that claim even vital?

    As a descendant of the Cherokees, I don’t plan on knocking on my neighbor’s door anytime soon and telling him that my family owned his property centuries ago and it’s rightfully mine now. Nor, is my black friend down the road demanding that I reimburse him for damages his family encountered in the “War of Northern Aggression”. If he does, I’m going to ask for the money back in the name of my ancestors who fought to free his folks (if he wants to play the game) as I had family on both sides. Second thought, if I can prove I’m a descendant of a “tribe”, I’ve got my own share of entitlements coming from US Government care packages. Race and blood quantum are not factors in Cherokee Nation tribal citizenship eligibility. To be considered a citizen, an individual needs a direct Indian ancestor listed on the Dawes Rolls.

    As long as everyone is fat and happy, life is wonderful isn’t it? The character in the film “Network” who portrayed the “prophet of the airwaves”, Howard Beales, made the point in his rant about us being content by having our microwave ovens and steel-belted radials. Pacify the masses with toys, entertainment, etc… that way they don’t see what’s actually going on in the world.
    Everybody should read Edward Bernays’ 1928 book, “Propaganda”. It’s only 159 pages.

    Click to access bernays.pdf

    You no doubt already know about the “League Of Nations”. The UN’s predecessor. The program was on their minds for quite awhile. Probably going back into the 1800s or even before. Satan needs globalism to carry out his plan.

    I’ve got more, but I’m going to be a good boy and save it for another time. I’ve rustled enough feathers lately. Praise the Lord and have a nice day.

    • David,

      I don’t disagree with your comments here. I have no doubt we will end up fighting a war with Iran, Syria, or both because in the Middle East we usually end up pulling Israel’s chestnuts out of the fire. Better for them if American boys die for their interests than for Israeli boys to have to. While I have no problem with Jewish people, I have no use for political Zionism, which statement may also ruffle a few feathers.

      I am not so sure you can take Genesis 12:3 and apply it to most Jews today, seeing that many of them would have a hard time proving any biological connection to Abraham due to their Eastern European ancestors. Besides, the promise looked forward to Christ for it was through Him that all families of the earth would be blessed.

      I once had someone tell me that we are obligated as Christians to condone whatever the Jews do, no matter how bad or evil, just because they are Jews and are, therefore, the “chosen people.” I disagree. If you ever get a chance, try to find a little book by Charles Provan called “The Church is Israel Now.”

      • Mr. Benson…

        Yes sir, you’re going to be called a “replacement theologian” now. By the way, don’t you just love labels? (I hear those feathers ruffling, time to go).

  5. Pingback: Senate Joins House in Condemning UN’s ‘Agenda 21’ (TN) « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  6. P.S. Will check that out. If you mean the “Israel of God”, I agree. Whether you like it or not, no one is getting into the Kingdom without Jesus Christ no matter how “chosen” you are.
    I found this. Possibly not a complete work but good enough for now. Thanks for the suggestion.

    Click to access church-is-now-isreal.pdf

  7. David,
    What settled this question about who is the chosen people was settled for me years ago when I read Galatians 3, particularly vs. 29. All who are in Christ are Abraham’s seed, Jews or Gentiles. Paul also notes in one of the epistles, I can’t find the reference right now, where he mentions the Jew, the Gentile, and the Israel of God, which is the Christians. Today we are the Israel of God, not that political entity in the Middle East. Due in large measure to the notes in the Scofield Bible, many Christians are looking at going “back to Israel (Egypt) when they should be looking at going ahead with Christ.

  8. Pingback: BREAKING => State Governors Must Stop Obama’s Executive Order: Allowing United Nation Control Of America’s Agriculture. | Political Vel Craft

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s