By Al Benson Jr.
I have had major problems with the United Nations for decades now. It is an organization that has had the support of Communists and socialists all over the world, including many in this country. Does anyone remember Alger Hiss? Many younger folks will not, but just for the heck of it do a Google search on Mr. Hiss and see what you find—a major connection between him, the State Department, the United Nations, and communism. Also do a Google search on a book by G. Edward Griffin called The Fearful Master. If you can still purchase this book, do so.
Given its deep pink background, why should we be surprised that the United Nations should come up with something like Agenda 21. It’s right down their collectivist alley. Never heard of it, you say. Not surprising. What passes for news media in this country is not about to let you know about Agenda 21 until the current Marxist administration can find some way to sidestep the Constitution and ram it down our throats.
According to http://green-agenda.com “Agenda 21 was the main outcome of the United Nations Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. Agenda 21 outlines, in detail, the UN’s vision for a centrally managed global society. The contract binds governments around the world to the United Nations plan for controlling the way we live, eat, learn, move and communicate—all under the noble banner of saving the earth. If fully implemented, Agenda 21 would have the government involved in every aspect of life of every human on earth.”
The article continues: “Agenda 21 spreads its tentacles from Governments, to federal and local authorities, and right down to community groups.” These people have a concept of One World Government that will embrace everyone everywhere. No one gets to sneak under the collectivist radar.
Maurice Strong, first Secretary General of the United Nations Environmental Programme has stated: “The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation. It is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation states, however powerful. The global community must be assured of environmental security…Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class—involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, air-conditioning, and suburban housing—are not sustainable. A shift is necessary which will require a vast strengthening of the multilateral system, including the United Nations.”
Stop and look at what this man is saying. The United Nations has determined that your life style is no longer to be allowed. If they have their way they will control what you eat, where you live, whether you get to drive your car, even whether you will be allowed air conditioning. It all makes you wonder if these One World planners are going to subject themselves to the conditions they are planning for the rest of us. Somehow, with my suspicious mind, I rather doubt that. Part of their price for reducing the rest of us to serfs will be the ability to enjoy a life style that they wish to deny to the rest of us. Sound familiar?
The site http://patriotupdate.com has listed many of those things that Agenda 21 will eliminate in order that the world may be more “environmentally sustainable.” In an article by Ralph Barker, written in September, 2011 Mr. Barker points out many of these “unsustainable” things we will have to forego:
All private property—(naturally, in accordance with the Communist Manifesto)
Livestock production and most meat consumption,
Privately owned vehicles and personal travel,
Use of fossil fuels for power generation or mechanized travel,
Single family homes,
Human population must be reduced to fewer than 1 billion people. How do you suppose they will manage this last one? The same way the Communists did in the Ukraine in the 1930s?
You may think this sounds far out and it’s something you might want to think about in twenty years or so, maybe, but the fact is that 179 countries have already signed on to Agenda 21 and “nearly 12,000 local and federal authorities have legally committed themselves to the Agenda. If your town or country signs onto this thing it means you don’t even sneeze without UN permission.
Some towns across the country are waking up to this draconian measure and are taking a stand against it. A locality in Texas recently voted against this, as did the town of Colton, California. If this UN measure ever comes before your town council they need to be on record as voting against it.
Ask yourselves just one question—if you live in the Deep South in the United States, how will any relatives you have with respiratory conditions survive the summers there without air conditioning? They won’t—but then that is probably part of the United Nations plan isn’t it?